betfair single customer view trial started

News, chat and debate about the Betfair betting exchange.
zippus
Posts: 181
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2019 3:19 pm

Sounds like Big Brother to me. The premise that someone that has self-excluded and can't stop gambling - so needs to be protected - is admirable. However, these new rules would simply empower the gambling industry to forceably exclude those people they deem to be a problem. This is open to abuse and would represent a huge infringement on our civil liberties. It's quite worrying to see how much the Big State wants to control every aspect of our lives.

I have a real problem with someone telling me how to spend my (taxed) income. Quite where this will end if it stands, who knows. Digital currency, social credits etc etc...
User avatar
xtrader16
Posts: 411
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2017 1:00 pm

I was under the impression that they are trying to stop people killing themselves by stopping people betting themselves into a depressive state and ending it all (plenty of other reason you will end up like this in today's society are you going to ban them all) . Probably less than 10 people per year do this.

So what they should be assessing is individuals metal state and not the profit/loss on somebody's account. How can they assess the mental state of somebody by looking at their P/L sheet. They need to pay for a psychological assessment of individuals before closing accounts.
User avatar
ilovepizza82
Posts: 493
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2017 3:41 pm
Location: Sewers
Contact:

xtrader16 wrote:
Sat Feb 25, 2023 4:04 pm
I was under the impression that they are trying to stop people killing themselves by stopping people betting themselves into a depressive state and ending it all (plenty of other reason you will end up like this in today's society are you going to ban them all) . Probably less than 10 people per year do this.

So what they should be assessing is individuals metal state and not the profit/loss on somebody's account. How can they assess the mental state of somebody by looking at their P/L sheet. They need to pay for a psychological assessment of individuals before closing accounts.
THey just assume everyone is immature and mentaly sick these days :)
zippus
Posts: 181
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2019 3:19 pm

I have a real issue with this. I’ll happily share my story and why this approach doesn’t work for me.

I’m a fairly successful businessman with decent assets and cash in the bank. I’m looking to trade full time and have invested significant monies post covid in learning the trading game. I made lots of mistakes early on and took some losses, some of which were heavy. Nevertheless, all historical losses were fully affordable and I was never risking my way of life or mental health. I’ve finally managed to turn things round and am now making decent long-term profits. Now the rug may be pulled from under me because I’m in a net-loss situation plus previously refused to provide sensitive data to an exchange and they closed my account. (This was fine with me because the exchange lacked the liquidity of Betfair and I was happy to withdraw the money). Very frustrating and I’m not happy to say the least!
WisdomOfCrowds
Posts: 48
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2021 2:55 pm

All of this is beyond belief. At the very least, there must be some means of appeal against having an account closed. This appeal must be done by an independent body, not the bookmakers, who now seem to be judge, jury and executioner.

In no other walk of life do we have to justify how we spend our money. This infringes on our civil liberties and simply shouldn't be allowed.

The white paper still hasn't yet reached parliament. Hopefully, the sane amongst the MPs (and Lords) will do something to help us as I feel as though we're being completely ignored and under-represented in this process.

The bookmakers have done a great deal to create 'problem gamblers' but now seem to be charged with policing it.
andy28
Posts: 369
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2021 12:06 am
Location: NZ

“Whilst many companies put forward proposals for this system, it was clear that GAMSTOP stood out from the rest. They are uniquely placed as they currently operate the online gambling self-exclusion scheme which has helped more than two hundred and fifty thousand people over the last five years

What do they consider as helped?

I would like to know if there is ever a follow up say a year later asking family/friends if there is still a problem, because without proper help or strong will power not to go down the same rabbit hole I would be willing to bet most will still be gambling, most likely illegally
User avatar
Derek27
Posts: 23632
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2017 11:44 am
Location: UK

andy28 wrote:
Sun Feb 26, 2023 2:47 am
I would like to know if there is ever a follow up say a year later asking family/friends if there is still a problem,
I would like to think that would be illegal, a breach of confidentiality. ;)
andy28
Posts: 369
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2021 12:06 am
Location: NZ

Derek27 wrote:
Sun Feb 26, 2023 3:39 am
andy28 wrote:
Sun Feb 26, 2023 2:47 am
I would like to know if there is ever a follow up say a year later asking family/friends if there is still a problem,
I would like to think that would be illegal, a breach of confidentiality. ;)
You are probably right. In which case they can't say they have helped anyone as they would have no way of knowing
User avatar
Derek27
Posts: 23632
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2017 11:44 am
Location: UK

andy28 wrote:
Sun Feb 26, 2023 5:04 am
Derek27 wrote:
Sun Feb 26, 2023 3:39 am
andy28 wrote:
Sun Feb 26, 2023 2:47 am
I would like to know if there is ever a follow up say a year later asking family/friends if there is still a problem,
I would like to think that would be illegal, a breach of confidentiality. ;)
You are probably right. In which case they can't say they have helped anyone as they would have no way of knowing
Simply making contact can count as help. The Jehovah Witnesses help a million people a day!
User avatar
Naffman
Posts: 5638
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2013 5:46 am

I had my BF account locked and told I wouldn’t even get my funds back just a year ago, it was only that I went higher up that I managed to rectify this. There is absolutely no chance once a decision is made that they will reverse it, betting in this country will be on its knees soon.
User avatar
Sonny
Posts: 8
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2021 11:34 am
Location: East of England

Single customer view, affordability checks - Orwellian.... :shock:

This is just affecting UK-based customers, right?

Anybody got an idea of the state of the matter for people residing in e.g. Ireland or Malta?
User avatar
Kai
Posts: 6193
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2015 12:21 pm

Sonny wrote:
Sun Feb 26, 2023 4:23 pm
This is just affecting UK-based customers, right?

Anybody got an idea of the state of the matter for people residing in e.g. Ireland or Malta?
I think it's only UK-based, not heard otherwise yet so hopefully that's the case?

I've not asked directly but the only few questions about it that I got from my account manager were a relatively basic check which is probably standard stuff, about staying within your own limits and being familiar with player protection tools etc, and a question about profession where a vague description of the field is enough
User avatar
cmuddle
Posts: 160
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2017 7:12 pm

xtrader16 wrote:
Sat Feb 25, 2023 12:09 pm
Derek27 wrote:
Sat Feb 25, 2023 11:55 am
Putin launching an all-out nuclear attack on Western Europe is now just a trivial concern on this forum. :)
Why bother worrying about a Nuclear attack on the UK - we know how it ends so why even worry about it. Somethings are far more important.

I've just read through this thread and it seems ANYBODY who has been banned from one Bookmaker for one reason or another is going to be banned by every Bookie who is registered to the scheme. I was banned by Ladbrokes for using my wife's account (it doesn't matter how they found out) does this mean I will be banned from ever putting a bet on again, even on Betfair once they find out.

This is proper Orwellian sh!t this, crazy. I've spend years trying to make trading work and just as about I am about to go into constant profit they think they can pull the plug on EVERY account. This is insane.

Just because a few people kill themselves after going to far. Sorry if it sounds heartless but these people probably would have died of something at some point anyway. 20,000 people die of Alcohol poising every year and I don't see that getting banned. The worst thing is THEY INTRODUCED the Casio style games that the odd few people get sucked into - they created this problem. Once they start to share information and act on it they will have to close 10,s of thousands of accounts overnight. It is none of their business where I spend my money.
I totally agree, all those stupid casino games are dangerous and this is where most lose their money.
User avatar
ShaunWhite
Posts: 9731
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 3:42 am

cmuddle wrote:
Mon Mar 06, 2023 2:03 am
[. 20,000 people die of Alcohol poising every year and I don't see that getting banned.
But they do restrict advertising, ditto for perfectly legal tobacco. It's ridiculous they can ram gambling adverts down people's throats 247 and then try to tell people they can't do it. F1, darts, etc all survived when tobacco and booze money was banned so its about time football and commercial TV stations did the decent thing and stopped sucking at the teat of the gambling industry.
Post Reply

Return to “Betfair exchange”