I understand the looking for a gap between the best back and lay price.
But how does one go about looking for gaps either on the backing side (between best back price and second best back price) or the lay side (between best lay price and second best lay price)?
Can this be done?
Neil.
Gap finding bot.
-
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2017 10:25 am
Cheers Euler.
I've studied that thread previously.
How do I get the bot to identity gaps on back or lay side only?
Gaps between best and second best price specifically.
Neil.
- ShaunWhite
- Posts: 9731
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 3:42 am
I can't help much but it must be frustrating that everytime you ask about gaps you're pointed to things about spreads.8ballprowler wrote: ↑Sun May 09, 2021 1:53 pmCheers Euler.
I've studied that thread previously.
How do I get the bot to identity gaps on back or lay side only?
Gaps between best and second best price specifically.
Neil.
Is there a way for BA to return the number of ticks between 2 prices? Eg Best 2 - Best 1 as ticks rather then just a number? I'd guess it can otherwise the spread finder bot wouldn't work. Then maybe if best 2 - best 1 > 1tick you could bet at best 2 + 1 tick? Something like that anyway.
Yes Shaun - It is a bit of a hassle and not ideal, but here is an example of how it can be done
Store these values:
Back Price
Back Price -1
Back Price -2
Back Price -3
Next rule, conditions:
Back Price Money Waiting greater than 10
Back Price -1 Money Waiting equal to 0
Back Price -2 Money Waiting equal to 0
Back Price -3 Money Waiting greater than 10
This to identify there is a 2 tick gap between Best Back Price and 2nd Best Back Price (Back Price -3)
There is not a simpler way in Guardian that I know of to identify the distance/return the number of ticks between Best Back and 2nd Best Back, which would be better imo
as Shaun describes a condition where it can be stated that the Best Back Price is 2 ticks greater than the 2nd Best Back Price would be nice and simple
IIRC it was suggested more than once, hoping next update has it
Store these values:
Back Price
Back Price -1
Back Price -2
Back Price -3
Next rule, conditions:
Back Price Money Waiting greater than 10
Back Price -1 Money Waiting equal to 0
Back Price -2 Money Waiting equal to 0
Back Price -3 Money Waiting greater than 10
This to identify there is a 2 tick gap between Best Back Price and 2nd Best Back Price (Back Price -3)
There is not a simpler way in Guardian that I know of to identify the distance/return the number of ticks between Best Back and 2nd Best Back, which would be better imo
as Shaun describes a condition where it can be stated that the Best Back Price is 2 ticks greater than the 2nd Best Back Price would be nice and simple
IIRC it was suggested more than once, hoping next update has it
-
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2017 10:25 am
And on the lay side it would be +1 etc?Vovsen wrote: ↑Sun May 09, 2021 5:31 pmYes Shaun - It is a bit of a hassle and not ideal, but here is an example of how it can be done
Store these values:
Back Price
Back Price -1
Back Price -2
Back Price -3
Next rule, conditions:
Back Price Money Waiting greater than 10
Back Price -1 Money Waiting equal to 0
Back Price -2 Money Waiting equal to 0
Back Price -3 Money Waiting greater than 10
This to identify there is a 2 tick gap between Best Back Price and 2nd Best Back Price (Back Price -3)
There is not a simpler way in Guardian that I know of to identify the distance/return the number of ticks between Best Back and 2nd Best Back, which would be better imo
as Shaun describes a condition where it can be stated that the Best Back Price is 2 ticks greater than the 2nd Best Back Price would be nice and simple
IIRC it was suggested more than once, hoping next update has it
- firlandsfarm
- Posts: 2722
- Joined: Sat May 03, 2014 8:20 am
This would be easy to do with Excel. Have a table in the workbook containing all ticks and a sequential tick ID number (see attached). Then by using "vlookup" find the quoted odds (Col A) in the table and read the TickID No for each (Col B). Then subtract the two TickID No's. to get the gap. Alternatively, get the first TickID value and then add/subtract for the required gap and then perform "vlookup" again this time from TickID (Col B) and read the target odds from Col C.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Last edited by firlandsfarm on Tue May 11, 2021 8:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
Yeah8ballprowler wrote: ↑Mon May 10, 2021 10:52 amAnd on the lay side it would be +1 etc?Vovsen wrote: ↑Sun May 09, 2021 5:31 pmYes Shaun - It is a bit of a hassle and not ideal, but here is an example of how it can be done
Store these values:
Back Price
Back Price -1
Back Price -2
Back Price -3
Next rule, conditions:
Back Price Money Waiting greater than 10
Back Price -1 Money Waiting equal to 0
Back Price -2 Money Waiting equal to 0
Back Price -3 Money Waiting greater than 10
This to identify there is a 2 tick gap between Best Back Price and 2nd Best Back Price (Back Price -3)
There is not a simpler way in Guardian that I know of to identify the distance/return the number of ticks between Best Back and 2nd Best Back, which would be better imo
as Shaun describes a condition where it can be stated that the Best Back Price is 2 ticks greater than the 2nd Best Back Price would be nice and simple
IIRC it was suggested more than once, hoping next update has it
Lay side:
Stored Value condition, that the Money Waiting to Lay at a price held in another Stored Valued: Lay Price, Lay +1 Lay+2 Etc
Back side
Stored Value condition, that the Money Waiting to Back at a price held in another Stored Valued: Back Price, Back +1 Back+2 Etc
But for this kinda stuff I would go with Excel as suggested, unless you have spotted a very simple, specific scenario you want to identify as the example above, and it happens frequently and/or is worth trading as it becomes a lot of conditions and tiresome to edit if you want flexibility
- firlandsfarm
- Posts: 2722
- Joined: Sat May 03, 2014 8:20 am
OK, here's a baf file that is a set of rules that calculates the TickIDNo for the price it is pointed at so you need to change the rules for the target as follows ...
General tab: Set "Applies to selection" as required
Conditions tab: The values should not be changed but you can change the "Back Price" label to any of the other prices.
Stored Values tab: Change "the Back Price of a selection" as required. Also, assuming you will use this to target 2 prices to ascertain a gap you should change the Tick01.sv to a meaningful name, maybe "Back01_Tick01.sv" (note: I always suffix my SV's with ".sv" for clarity from Signals but it's not necessary for you to do so). Likewise change the names of "Tick02.sv" and "TickID.sv" and the inter-references between these SV rules.. It is TickID.sv that contains the Tick Number from the xlsx file I posted earlier. So maybe that is now "Back01_TickID.sv" Note: you need to do this for every individual rule in the ruleset.
Now copy all the rules within the same ruleset and repeat the process but this time choosing a different rename for Tick01.sv, maybe Back02_Tick01.sv and again do likewise for Tick02.sv and TickID.sv. Again it is (maybe) Back02_TickID.sv that contains the Tick Number for the second price.
The Gap in ticks is the subtraction of one TickID Number from the other. When using this think about which way round you want the Gap to numerate ... as a positive or a negative!
Hope this is of help. It's something I've been meaning to do for a while and never got around to it.
General tab: Set "Applies to selection" as required
Conditions tab: The values should not be changed but you can change the "Back Price" label to any of the other prices.
Stored Values tab: Change "the Back Price of a selection" as required. Also, assuming you will use this to target 2 prices to ascertain a gap you should change the Tick01.sv to a meaningful name, maybe "Back01_Tick01.sv" (note: I always suffix my SV's with ".sv" for clarity from Signals but it's not necessary for you to do so). Likewise change the names of "Tick02.sv" and "TickID.sv" and the inter-references between these SV rules.. It is TickID.sv that contains the Tick Number from the xlsx file I posted earlier. So maybe that is now "Back01_TickID.sv" Note: you need to do this for every individual rule in the ruleset.
Now copy all the rules within the same ruleset and repeat the process but this time choosing a different rename for Tick01.sv, maybe Back02_Tick01.sv and again do likewise for Tick02.sv and TickID.sv. Again it is (maybe) Back02_TickID.sv that contains the Tick Number for the second price.
The Gap in ticks is the subtraction of one TickID Number from the other. When using this think about which way round you want the Gap to numerate ... as a positive or a negative!
Hope this is of help. It's something I've been meaning to do for a while and never got around to it.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- Thebest147
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 8:01 am
It seems after 5 years 2months it is a closely guarded secret that Dallas and Peter are keeping to themselves
- Thebest147
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 8:01 am
Original post way back
-
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2017 10:25 am
So is the back side a + or -?Vovsen wrote: ↑Tue May 11, 2021 7:41 amYeah8ballprowler wrote: ↑Mon May 10, 2021 10:52 amAnd on the lay side it would be +1 etc?Vovsen wrote: ↑Sun May 09, 2021 5:31 pmYes Shaun - It is a bit of a hassle and not ideal, but here is an example of how it can be done
Store these values:
Back Price
Back Price -1
Back Price -2
Back Price -3
Next rule, conditions:
Back Price Money Waiting greater than 10
Back Price -1 Money Waiting equal to 0
Back Price -2 Money Waiting equal to 0
Back Price -3 Money Waiting greater than 10
This to identify there is a 2 tick gap between Best Back Price and 2nd Best Back Price (Back Price -3)
There is not a simpler way in Guardian that I know of to identify the distance/return the number of ticks between Best Back and 2nd Best Back, which would be better imo
as Shaun describes a condition where it can be stated that the Best Back Price is 2 ticks greater than the 2nd Best Back Price would be nice and simple
IIRC it was suggested more than once, hoping next update has it
Lay side:
Stored Value condition, that the Money Waiting to Lay at a price held in another Stored Valued: Lay Price, Lay +1 Lay+2 Etc
Back side
Stored Value condition, that the Money Waiting to Back at a price held in another Stored Valued: Back Price, Back +1 Back+2 Etc
But for this kinda stuff I would go with Excel as suggested, unless you have spotted a very simple, specific scenario you want to identify as the example above, and it happens frequently and/or is worth trading as it becomes a lot of conditions and tiresome to edit if you want flexibility
Just that you have it as a - further up this conversation feed. And just now you have the back price as a +.
I appreciate your input nevertheless Vovsen.
Neil.
Sorry it should be a - for Back Prices8ballprowler wrote: ↑Wed May 12, 2021 1:26 pmSo is the back side a + or -?Vovsen wrote: ↑Tue May 11, 2021 7:41 amYeah
Lay side:
Stored Value condition, that the Money Waiting to Lay at a price held in another Stored Valued: Lay Price, Lay +1 Lay+2 Etc
Back side
Stored Value condition, that the Money Waiting to Back at a price held in another Stored Valued: Back Price, Back +1 Back+2 Etc
But for this kinda stuff I would go with Excel as suggested, unless you have spotted a very simple, specific scenario you want to identify as the example above, and it happens frequently and/or is worth trading as it becomes a lot of conditions and tiresome to edit if you want flexibility
Just that you have it as a - further up this conversation feed. And just now you have the back price as a +.
I appreciate your input nevertheless Vovsen.
Neil.
Here it is corrected:
Back side
Stored Value condition, that the Money Waiting to Back at a price held in another Stored Valued: Back Price, Back -1 Back-2 Etc
A good way to test it without using real stakes is to use Ladder Markers, so when your rule triggers, having identified a gap, this gap identifier rule also stores a value, of lets say Back Price, call it BackPriceGapMarker or something like that (Or whatever Back Price - the number of ticks you want to see the Ladder Marker at)
-
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2017 10:25 am
Cheers Vovsen.Vovsen wrote: ↑Wed May 12, 2021 2:15 pmSorry it should be a - for Back Prices8ballprowler wrote: ↑Wed May 12, 2021 1:26 pmSo is the back side a + or -?Vovsen wrote: ↑Tue May 11, 2021 7:41 am
Yeah
Lay side:
Stored Value condition, that the Money Waiting to Lay at a price held in another Stored Valued: Lay Price, Lay +1 Lay+2 Etc
Back side
Stored Value condition, that the Money Waiting to Back at a price held in another Stored Valued: Back Price, Back +1 Back+2 Etc
But for this kinda stuff I would go with Excel as suggested, unless you have spotted a very simple, specific scenario you want to identify as the example above, and it happens frequently and/or is worth trading as it becomes a lot of conditions and tiresome to edit if you want flexibility
Just that you have it as a - further up this conversation feed. And just now you have the back price as a +.
I appreciate your input nevertheless Vovsen.
Neil.
Here it is corrected:
Back side
Stored Value condition, that the Money Waiting to Back at a price held in another Stored Valued: Back Price, Back -1 Back-2 Etc
A good way to test it without using real stakes is to use Ladder Markers, so when your rule triggers, having identified a gap, this gap identifier rule also stores a value, of lets say Back Price, call it BackPriceGapMarker or something like that (Or whatever Back Price - the number of ticks you want to see the Ladder Marker at)
Neil.
-
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2017 10:25 am
8ballprowler wrote: ↑Wed May 12, 2021 2:19 pmThis stored values is fascinating.Vovsen wrote: ↑Wed May 12, 2021 2:15 pmSorry it should be a - for Back Prices8ballprowler wrote: ↑Wed May 12, 2021 1:26 pm
So is the back side a + or -?
Just that you have it as a - further up this conversation feed. And just now you have the back price as a +.
I appreciate your input nevertheless Vovsen.
Neil.
Here it is corrected:
Back side
Stored Value condition, that the Money Waiting to Back at a price held in another Stored Valued: Back Price, Back -1 Back-2 Etc
A good way to test it without using real stakes is to use Ladder Markers, so when your rule triggers, having identified a gap, this gap identifier rule also stores a value, of lets say Back Price, call it BackPriceGapMarker or something like that (Or whatever Back Price - the number of ticks you want to see the Ladder Marker at)
So how is a bet or opening trade actually triggered by these stored values?
Neil.