1) Questions are usually ended with a question mark, exclamation marks are used for something completely different, so quite a reasonable assumption to make. Maybe you should have concentrated harder at school than furtively planning those shoplifting spreesfirlandsfarm wrote: ↑Thu Jun 18, 2020 1:50 pm1. The "happy" reference was as much a question as an assumption but I note you assumed it to be an assumption!
2. I particularly love your (flawed) assumption that I love making assumptions! Very ironic especially as I don't.
3. Not wishing to make an assumption but you seem to be saying that past deeds are acceptable if it doesn't bother the majority if so then where is the majority pushing the current anti-statue action? A few thousand who have nothing better to do does not a majority make out of a population of over 60 million.
4. Yes there is a very fine dividing line between terrorist and freedom fighter but not terrorist activity. Or are no suggesting that loss of life is acceptable?
5. I have no love for Cecil (another failed assumption but do keep trying, it's amusing). I'm often accused of supporting an individual by people who don't understand that a principle can be debated without regard for the person.
2) & 3) See above don't really want go round in circles about assumptions.
4) Loss of life should never be acceptable but sometimes it's simply inevitable, guess we have many wars to verify that's the case.
5) Well I never.