Case about to go thru the High Court - PP/Betfair

A place to discuss anything.
Post Reply
User avatar
megarain
Posts: 2051
Joined: Thu May 16, 2013 1:26 pm
Contact:

This might be a real doozy.
power case bigger.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
buyshirts
Posts: 412
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 12:37 pm

I can hear your mind ticking from here " what sort of account profile does he have that he can get £13k EW bets on with PP at Wolverhampton of all places!"
User avatar
Naffman
Posts: 5642
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2013 5:46 am

buyshirts wrote:
Wed Jun 16, 2021 11:28 am
I can hear your mind ticking from here " what sort of account profile does he have that he can get £13k EW bets on with PP at Wolverhampton of all places!"
Really does make you realise how little money is on the exchange imo.

PP surely have no case here
User avatar
megarain
Posts: 2051
Joined: Thu May 16, 2013 1:26 pm
Contact:

One of the key things for me, is whethe the Palp rule gets questioned etc.

If companies cannot Palp - 260k is a drop in the bucket.
User avatar
Derek27
Posts: 23664
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2017 11:44 am
Location: UK

buyshirts wrote:
Wed Jun 16, 2021 11:28 am
I can hear your mind ticking from here " what sort of account profile does he have that he can get £13k EW bets on with PP at Wolverhampton of all places!"
A losing one, surely?
User avatar
wearthefoxhat
Posts: 3221
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2018 9:55 am

megarain wrote:
Wed Jun 16, 2021 11:40 am
One of the key things for me, is whethe the Palp rule gets questioned etc.

If companies cannot Palp - 260k is a drop in the bucket.
The Palp rule used to apply to a price incorrectly given on a selection. If PP had given him 100/1 then they could apply it at 16/1.

The part that doesn't make sense was that his account balance was orginally £203.

Did they credit his account with £26,000 before accepting the bet? (Even the £1,300 e/w stake begs the same question)

The piss-taking part from PP is they just expect the punter to roll over and accept anything they say.
User avatar
Crazyskier
Posts: 1166
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 6:36 pm

It appears that the telephonist made the error when agreeing with a trader that 13k each way could be approved, rather than the requested £1300.

Either way, PP accepted the bet; PP must honour it.

If the horse had been unplaced, would PP have refunded the £26k?

We all know the answer to that!

CS
User avatar
Tuco
Posts: 728
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 1:43 pm

Crazyskier wrote:
Wed Jun 16, 2021 6:23 pm
It appears that the telephonist made the error when agreeing with a trader that 13k each way could be approved, rather than the requested £1300.

Either way, PP accepted the bet; PP must honour it.

If the horse had been unplaced, would PP have refunded the £26k?

We all know the answer to that!

CS
...exactly! They want it both ways - a no lose win!

...they had time to correct the error before the off - after the off, bad luck, too late, bet stands.

Basically someone has re-listened to the phone conversation and sought a manager to see if they can welch paying out.

utterly disgusting and if I was the judge I would not only make them pay the bet in full, all costs and interest, but I would fine them £286k on top as a lesson to be honourable - or the manager can spend 10 years in jail, their choice!
User avatar
Geordie
Posts: 174
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2014 10:54 am
Location: North East

wearthefoxhat
The part that doesn't make sense was that his account balance was orginally £203.
I read that as £203 was the maximum stake allowed on his account, not his balance.
Archery1969
Posts: 3217
Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2019 8:25 am
Location: Newport

Its about time these betting companies were slapt with a massive fine.

£260,000 to the punter plus legal costs and £10 Million fine to be paid to retired Horse Racing charities.
User avatar
megarain
Posts: 2051
Joined: Thu May 16, 2013 1:26 pm
Contact:

A few more details from Day 1.
pp dispute 2.jpeg

He had 78k in his account, before losing 19k, so was clearly able to get lumpy bets.

Making a market for this would be like reality Tv.

Currently think : 1.7 he gets paid.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
firlandsfarm
Posts: 2720
Joined: Sat May 03, 2014 8:20 am

Tuco wrote:
Wed Jun 16, 2021 10:17 pm
I would fine them £286k on top as a lesson to be honourable - or the manager can spend 10 years in jail, their choice!
I suspect PP would have the manager 'take one for the team'!! :lol:
User avatar
Tuco
Posts: 728
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 1:43 pm

firlandsfarm wrote:
Thu Jul 01, 2021 6:13 am
Tuco wrote:
Wed Jun 16, 2021 10:17 pm
I would fine them £286k on top as a lesson to be honourable - or the manager can spend 10 years in jail, their choice!
I suspect PP would have the manager 'take one for the team'!! :lol:
...they would certainly ask the question to him even for a fraction of that amount :lol:
User avatar
megarain
Posts: 2051
Joined: Thu May 16, 2013 1:26 pm
Contact:

Todays proceedings :

Turns out PP hedged 17k of it (presumably on the Worlds leading exchange).

The fact they didnt hedge more, maybe helps PP - if a Judge can understand etc (Big price)

Female Judge now considering the verdict.

Dunno - good contest. Coin-flip ?
User avatar
xtrader16
Posts: 411
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2017 1:00 pm

As far as I can see it only matter what bet was placed not what bet he asked for. The CSR read the bet back and he agreed to it. I think he will gat paid out and banned from Paddy Power forever.
Post Reply

Return to “General discussion”