Hi,
I was just curios to know why a lot of Mr. Webb's position sizes appear to be the same as megabyte storage capacities... i.e. £64, 128, 256, 512.... etc.
Is this just personal preference or is there some kind of mathematical advantage, like covering commissions or something?
Thanks
Peter Webb's position sizing in megabytes? :)
Peter is part robot but has explained it here:Brovashift wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 3:29 pmHi,
I was just curios to know why a lot of Mr. Webb's position sizes appear to be the same as megabyte storage capacities... i.e. £64, 128, 256, 512.... etc.
Is this just personal preference or is there some kind of mathematical advantage, like covering commissions or something?
Thanks
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZR5MC53y4z4
He has managed to convince the Blade Runner so far.
- Brovashift
- Posts: 475
- Joined: Tue May 18, 2021 12:35 am
Brilliant, thanks for the videoJukebox wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 3:35 pmPeter is part robot but has explained it here:Brovashift wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 3:29 pmHi,
I was just curios to know why a lot of Mr. Webb's position sizes appear to be the same as megabyte storage capacities... i.e. £64, 128, 256, 512.... etc.
Is this just personal preference or is there some kind of mathematical advantage, like covering commissions or something?
Thanks
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZR5MC53y4z4
He has managed to convince the Blade Runner so far.
01010100 01101000 01100001 01101110 01101011 00100000 01111001 01101111 01110101
Brovashift wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 3:57 pm
Brilliant, thanks for the video
01010100 01101000 01100001 01101110 01101011 00100000 01111001 01101111 01110101
01011001 01101111 01110101 00100111 01110010 01100101 00100000 01110111 01100101 01101100 01100011 01101111 01101101 01100101 00100001