I haven't hear of Fineform since my school days, early 80s. Positive Ratings cost £5, The Dawson System (a Martingale system) cost £20 and Fineform was somewhere in between. Although systems were popular at a time when overrounds were substantially higher than today with fewer bookies, betting tax was 10% and it was almost impossible to win, I would have thought exchanges with 100% overrounds would have made that sort of thing redundant.spreadbetting wrote: ↑Mon Nov 23, 2020 9:55 pmLoads of systems rely on things like jockey/trainer combinations, Clive Holt's fine form book sold by the bucket load and was pretty much based on the last three placings. Days since last run, sire, age, stall etc etc loads of info there for systems bettors just not form punters but they'd being doing a lot more to pick their selections.
HORSE RACING FORM ... can we add
- paspuggie48
- Posts: 633
- Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2013 9:22 am
- Location: South-West
I'm not sure if my comment got lost in translation or I missed the plot.
What I was trying to ask for was to have an ability in the Conditions of a Rule to weed out or add certain selections criteria based on Form, Jockey or whatever.
That information is available to display on the Ladder 'Additional Information' (so it is there somewhere) and as we know one can transpose that data to the One-Click screen.
So, can this information not be part of a Condition? Let's say "only select a horse that has finished 3rd or better in it's last race and is trained by Jim Boyle?"
What I was trying to ask for was to have an ability in the Conditions of a Rule to weed out or add certain selections criteria based on Form, Jockey or whatever.
That information is available to display on the Ladder 'Additional Information' (so it is there somewhere) and as we know one can transpose that data to the One-Click screen.
So, can this information not be part of a Condition? Let's say "only select a horse that has finished 3rd or better in it's last race and is trained by Jim Boyle?"
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- MemphisFlash
- Posts: 2159
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2014 10:12 pm
- Location: Leicester
interesting idea.
-
- Posts: 3140
- Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 8:06 pm
You can export that API data to excel with other software so no reason why it can't be made available.
i love how anytime we see other software replaced in these messages, we know full well that it's referring to Geese Toyspreadbetting wrote: ↑Tue Nov 24, 2020 1:22 pmYou can export that API data to excel with other software so no reason why it can't be made available.
-
- Posts: 3140
- Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 8:06 pm
I typed other software and wasn't actually Greasy Toy.jimibt wrote: ↑Tue Nov 24, 2020 1:34 pmi love how anytime we see other software replaced in these messages, we know full well that it's referring to Geese Toyspreadbetting wrote: ↑Tue Nov 24, 2020 1:22 pmYou can export that API data to excel with other software so no reason why it can't be made available.
- paspuggie48
- Posts: 633
- Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2013 9:22 am
- Location: South-West
- speedyhamster
- Posts: 119
- Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2017 9:58 am