Number of Unmatched Bets condition

[Tuco]

I would like the available options to be expanded to also include:

Number of Unmatched Back Bets condition and
Number of Unmatched Lay Bets condition

This would allow the opposite type of bets on a selection to be unaffected by implementing one of these conditions on a selection.

[Trader724]

You could try using the unmatched bets amounts condition so you can select the desired bet type.

[Dabbla]

UNM.PNG

[lotora]

I would like the available options to be expanded to also include:

Number of Unmatched Back Bets condition and
Number of Unmatched Lay Bets condition

This would allow the opposite type of bets on a selection to be unaffected by implementing one of these conditions on a selection.

Totally agree! These would make setting up automation easier and more precise—at least for me! Right now, I’m using a workaround that works fine, but it feels unnecessary.

[jamesedwards]

I would like the available options to be expanded to also include:

Number of Unmatched Back Bets condition and
Number of Unmatched Lay Bets condition

This would allow the opposite type of bets on a selection to be unaffected by implementing one of these conditions on a selection.

Totally agree! These would make setting up automation easier and more precise—at least for me! Right now, I’m using a workaround that works fine, but it feels unnecessary.

The post directly above yours shows exactly how to achieve this.

[lotora]

Absolutely!

Adding these four conditions—Number of unmatched back bets, Number of unmatched lay bets, Number of matched back bets, and Number of matched lay bets—is all about simplifying things. It would make automation setups so much more straightforward and user-friendly. Don’t you think?

[jamesedwards]

Absolutely!

Adding these four conditions—Number of unmatched back bets, Number of unmatched lay bets, Number of matched back bets, and Number of matched lay bets—is all about simplifying things. It would make automation setups so much more straightforward and user-friendly. Don’t you think?

But all those options are already there. I don't think I understand.

[lotora]

Yes, but none of these four mentioned conditions are listed under 'Condition Types.' (Edit: added screenshot)

[Dabbla]

You need to go to the condition (stored value condition) then change value A to what value you need . You don't need to store any values . See screen shot above .

[lotora]

You need to go to the condition (stored value condition) then change value A to what value you need . You don't need to store any values . See screen shot above .

True! works great!