What's the problem with a 100% AI generated statement/question.
whether it's Ai generated or not it's perfectly valid
i think it's not so much the content as the INTENT.. it's spammed, rather than a real user with a genuine question.ForFolksSake wrote: βTue Apr 29, 2025 9:50 amWhat's the problem with a 100% generated statement/question.
whether it's Ai generated or not it's perfectly valid![]()
But how do you know it's not a real user - it could have been you or me asking that questionjimibt wrote: βTue Apr 29, 2025 9:58 ami think it's not so much the content as the INTENT.. it's spammed, rather than a real user with a genuine question.ForFolksSake wrote: βTue Apr 29, 2025 9:50 amWhat's the problem with a 100% generated statement/question.
whether it's Ai generated or not it's perfectly valid![]()
![]()
i imagine because it was a new user - one for the big E to answer i guessForFolksSake wrote: βTue Apr 29, 2025 10:05 amBut how do you know it's not a real user - it could have been you or me asking that questionjimibt wrote: βTue Apr 29, 2025 9:58 ami think it's not so much the content as the INTENT.. it's spammed, rather than a real user with a genuine question.ForFolksSake wrote: βTue Apr 29, 2025 9:50 am
What's the problem with a 100% generated statement/question.
whether it's Ai generated or not it's perfectly valid![]()
![]()
So a 'new' user is not a 'real' userjimibt wrote: βTue Apr 29, 2025 10:17 ami imagine because it was a new user - one for the big E to answer i guessForFolksSake wrote: βTue Apr 29, 2025 10:05 amBut how do you know it's not a real user - it could have been you or me asking that question![]()
Yep, that will be someone with the software XRummer selling backlink packages.Euler wrote: βTue Apr 29, 2025 10:44 amThey ask a seemingly valid question, lie dormat for a while then we wake up to the forum full of spam one day.
And also, there is a really clever trick they can use to link to a site in what looks like a perfectly valid post. So this is the first step, getting the ability to post.
We know people are selling backlinks to the site and suspect they are the people trying hard to get access, so they can get that backlink.
It's clearly a minefield, and I for one applaud the efforts of Peter, Dallas et al in keeping a spam-free 'clean' forum for genuine human beings.Fugazi wrote: βTue May 13, 2025 11:25 pmYep, that will be someone with the software XRummer selling backlink packages.Euler wrote: βTue Apr 29, 2025 10:44 amThey ask a seemingly valid question, lie dormat for a while then we wake up to the forum full of spam one day.
And also, there is a really clever trick they can use to link to a site in what looks like a perfectly valid post. So this is the first step, getting the ability to post.
We know people are selling backlinks to the site and suspect they are the people trying hard to get access, so they can get that backlink.
Thought the world of SEO had moved on from backlink spamming 15 years ago. It used to be you could jump up google rank just by backlink spamming. Google put a stop to this a long time ago so don't know why people still bother, unless its purely for a few rogue clicks to the website.
Looks like they have added some new functionality. Monitoring their updates is probably a good way to stop a lot of the spam as most people use XRumer:
"An important update for XRumer 23.0.5 StrongAI introduces a significant enhancement: self-learning for unknown fields and text CAPTCHAs using GPT (with support for GPT-compatible APIs). Other key improvements include increased success rates for forums, contact forms, and other platforms, as well as expanded functionality."
This user replied to jimibt but inserted a cryptocurrency sentence with a promotional link in my quoted post that I never wrote in my original post.TrueFalse wrote: βMon Mar 03, 2025 9:17 amMotivation is perhaps the main obstacle for many. At times when a person loses interest in what he or she is doing, it seems that he or she is unable to break through the wall, even if it is because of his or her own efforts and attitude.jimibt wrote: βWed Feb 26, 2025 9:08 pmtbh -(imho), afaik, creativity is spawned by *variance*. we just KNOW that we're in a rut and something pushes us to climb over the edge. now, you could argue that having a constant *non variance* would counter that, but in my experience, faced with impending black holes and a pinch of doom, we tend to blossom...Kai wrote: βWed Feb 26, 2025 7:37 pm
Firlandsfarm/nature does have a point, technically artificial insemination makes going into those directions possible
Hard to blame the ladies, and can't say I'm not a bit concerned with the fact we keep getting dumber over time when you look at the IQ downtrend, while AI keeps getting smarter. Already outscores us in IQ tests but can't do everything yet as there's obviously different types of intelligence : mathematical, verbal, creative, logical, spatial, musical etc... Although (!) we should be mostly interested in how it's going to perform in the EQ tests![]()
And add variance to that as well, think one advantage it has over us is its intelligence isn't prone to variance like ours, it operates at a consistent efficiency while we're annoyingly impacted by both external and internal factors like sleep, stress or motivation. where decisions need to be made quickly and without emotion, this can be a great advantage for AI, but it is important for humans to learn how to control these factors in order to make informed decisions
Especially motivation, I actually feel it's the most underrated factor that also directly ties into why many people start thinking they lack intelligence to crack trading whenever they hit a wall, which is nonsense really. When you're only chasing a quick buck your brain just won't be interested enough to fully engage with the problem, let alone solve it.
You either find the market and the game genuinely fascinating, or you don't!
Thanks for flagging it, they way you have described has been a common tactic of spammers these last 12-18mthsKai wrote: βMon Jun 30, 2025 12:33 pmInteresting thread, and a cool title![]()
This reminds me of a sneaky post I noticed, that got past spam detection and still appears to be sitting there. I must not have thought much of it at the time and probably forgot to report it, but I can link to it here below as something to watch out for.
This user replied to jimibt but inserted a cryptocurrency sentence with a promotional link in my quoted post that I never wrote in my original post.TrueFalse wrote: βMon Mar 03, 2025 9:17 amMotivation is perhaps the main obstacle for many. At times when a person loses interest in what he or she is doing, it seems that he or she is unable to break through the wall, even if it is because of his or her own efforts and attitude.jimibt wrote: βWed Feb 26, 2025 9:08 pm
tbh -(imho), afaik, creativity is spawned by *variance*. we just KNOW that we're in a rut and something pushes us to climb over the edge. now, you could argue that having a constant *non variance* would counter that, but in my experience, faced with impending black holes and a pinch of doom, we tend to blossom...
Idk much about SEO farming etc but this looks like a shill account. I suspect the overall strategy is to:
1. Create a fresh account
2. Post a few harmless generic replies
3. Drop a final post that somehow includes a promo link
4. Disappear
To obviously get past spam detection and generate some organic-looking backlinks for SEO