hi all ,
running a comparison between selections and their respective VOLUME %.
the option to round off to 2 decimal places is too volatile ,especially when dealing with volume.
whole umbers are too large to capture the closest true value to the current voulume %.
whats the best way to achieve a one decimal place or a truncation.?
much thanks.
rounding off / truncate to 1 decimal place ? HOW ?
i think the idea would be that 23.14 becomes 231 and 45.52 becomes 455 (after rounding down). you could then do a further divide by 10 to take those numbers back to 23.1 and 45.5. a bit convoluted i know, but it is what it is
[edit] - you could of course just leave the factored whole numbers as is and compare on those to save the additional step.
thanks jimjimibt wrote: ↑Tue Jun 15, 2021 3:41 pmi think the idea would be that 23.14 becomes 231 and 45.52 becomes 455 (after rounding down). you could then do a further divide by 10 to take those numbers back to 23.1 and 45.5. a bit convoluted i know, but it is what it is
[edit] - you could of course just leave the factored whole numbers as is and compare on those to save the additional step.
convolution /per excelounce
just need to do that 1000 times on my automation rules.
well, it was mainly gutuami's idea. but - depending on your requirement, you could do this as a single 3 step rule and apply it to EVERY selectiondecomez6 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 15, 2021 4:08 pmthanks jimjimibt wrote: ↑Tue Jun 15, 2021 3:41 pmi think the idea would be that 23.14 becomes 231 and 45.52 becomes 455 (after rounding down). you could then do a further divide by 10 to take those numbers back to 23.1 and 45.5. a bit convoluted i know, but it is what it is
[edit] - you could of course just leave the factored whole numbers as is and compare on those to save the additional step.
convolution /per excelounce
just need to do that 1000 times on my automation rules.
thanks gutuami a mathemagician indeedjimibt wrote: ↑Tue Jun 15, 2021 4:49 pmwell, it was mainly gutuami's idea. but - depending on your requirement, you could do this as a single 3 step rule and apply it to EVERY selectiondecomez6 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 15, 2021 4:08 pmthanks jimjimibt wrote: ↑Tue Jun 15, 2021 3:41 pm
i think the idea would be that 23.14 becomes 231 and 45.52 becomes 455 (after rounding down). you could then do a further divide by 10 to take those numbers back to 23.1 and 45.5. a bit convoluted i know, but it is what it is
[edit] - you could of course just leave the factored whole numbers as is and compare on those to save the additional step.
convolution /per excelounce
just need to do that 1000 times on my automation rules.
my requirements are bloated and over the top. sometimes i think i complicate even the most simplest of tasks.
remember what i did with identical prices meet point bot, iam swapping the prices and taking volume as my pivot point . everything rotating around the volume%.
you can take a look at one part of the puzzle on the copy bot below (not firirng ) good luck if you can make it run please let me know:
trying to identify two similar volume% and backing them . the capture range is 1% difference between the selections in question. (0.1% to 0.5% and -0.1% to -0.5%) .NO rounding off
next one is almost similar but the first back rule is attached to the stored values , which have been rounded off to the nearest two decimal places . still not firing
when you find time take a look , OR suggest a better way .
thanks again gatuami ,
cheers jim
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
finally got it to work !
find two identical volume %
back /lay
or use as part of other codnditions.
have some fun '
thank again for your help gutuami.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.