bet in play bot help

[goat68]

So back you lose, lay you lose,...what's the answer nobody knows (except for 5%!)

OF COURSE this is true. I'm surprised that you haven't internalized this already.

If it was that easy everyone would be doing it, and the 5% would be the 95%.

And how does that make sense?

YES! I was just re-stating...

The answer is sort of obvious, do the opposite of what the 95% are doing...

[goat68]

So back you lose, lay you lose,...what's the answer nobody knows (except for 5%!)

OF COURSE this is true. I'm surprised that you haven't internalized this already.

If it was that easy everyone would be doing it, and the 5% would be the 95%.

And how does that make sense?

YES! I was just re-stating...

The answer is sort of obvious, do the opposite of what the 95% are doing...

Peter has a great video on it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlmMKrqFz8g

I know all this, yet actually knowing what the "opposite" is, is actually quite difficult...

[ShaunWhite]

I wonder if one day we could have a shared pool with everyone?

It's weak because in-running betting isn't allowed in Aus.

This is not true

? Sorry. I really thought that was the case.

[ShaunWhite]

So back you lose, lay you lose,...what's the answer nobody knows (except for 5%!)

By opposite I mean offering prices instead of taking prices. Yes it has the effect of backs becoming lays and visa versa but it's all about the price.

It's far fewer than 5% who pull that off. The 5% is anyone longer term profitable incl all the straight backers on other sports. I'd imaging profitable 'traders' would be half of that?