even counterfeit would be a risk!!
i think alas, it's often presumed (by newcomers) that any automation files that work well for an individual and are posted on the forum, are good to go!!
even counterfeit would be a risk!!
did you stop all the servants when you greened up?....it seems they all remained active, a stopp all servants rule is neecessary after your greening rule.
Use it in practice mode as much as you like. Anything else is nuts.elofan0 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 17, 2020 9:28 ami wouldnt trust any automation as far as i could throw it you only need a slight hesitation in the data recieved from betfair or internet provider to cost a loss ... this bot (gremlin) cant be trusted yet and should only be used in practice mode that should be for all until consistency as emerged ... it was doing well at first look so i havent kicked it completely out of interest . it just needs opening up by someone who knows why it performs and dont perform ..
i will keep looking at any updates ...
true.elofan0 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 17, 2020 9:28 ami slight hesitation in the data recieved from betfair or internet provider to cost a loss ... it was doing well at first look so i havent kicked it completely out of interest . it just needs opening up by someone who knows why it performs and dont perform ..
i will keep looking at any updates ...
we are more like this:
API glitches, internet stutters, power cuts etc etc will always happen but over a reasonably long period make zero difference to the returns thanks to overall market efficiency. The unexpected losses and unexpected gains even out. Many people who run automation 247365 can attest to that. Losses come from a strategy being fundamentally flawed.
ShaunWhite wrote: ↑Fri Jul 17, 2020 2:15 pm...well don't post bots that have virtually no chance of working and then talk about them as if you're one rule away from riches. Some people are crazy enough to believe you.
Every strategy comes with a warning label. And the only way to convert a simple strategy into a winning one is by timing and conditioning,Did I miss the posting about market selection?
That first paragraph simply isn't correct. And for someone with so little experience you should be careful of making assertions like that because you'll close your eyes to all the other considerations.decomez6 wrote: ↑Sat Jul 18, 2020 6:21 amAnd the only way to convert a simple strategy into a winning one is by timing and conditioning,
The ‘ELEPHANT in the ROOM is , how can a collective imaginative capacity of a forum like this cannot Convert a simple strategy like the one proposed here into a profitable one?
This video from Peter is a brilliant way of converting a simple strategy into a winning one.
i stay corrected , ofcourse there are countless ways to flip a coin with equal chances of loosing and winning minus the Noise ( standard deviation). i am an enthusiast, abressive teachers can only make me sharp. i mean this in a good way.ShaunWhite wrote: ↑Sat Jul 18, 2020 1:58 pmThat first paragraph simply isn't correct. And for someone with so little experience you should be careful of making assertions like that because you'll close your eyes to all the other considerations.
that video brought me to bet angel , was my introduction to sports trading. its pure strategy ,i actually made the following servant to try and capture a random WIN and LOOSE streaks , which will correspond to black and red colours on the cards respectively.ShaunWhite wrote: ↑Sat Jul 18, 2020 1:58 pmI haven't watched that video but I assume you're referring to devising a strategy and then addressing the losers, leaving you with just the winners. Again that's naive and over simplistic.
The one question you haven't addressed is why this strategy should work. , even when it come to results several days or even several weeks of wins means nothing without you being able to measure if that gain is coming from an edge or natural varience. You've just picked a random idea and are making random changes, that's not how it's done.