New beta version of Bet Angel v1.43.1

Post Reply
User avatar
LeTiss
Posts: 5386
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 6:04 pm

Hate Windows 10, it's the biggest pile of shit.....since....well Windows 8.1

I still have Windows 7 on my desktop PC and it's a much better operating system
User avatar
Dallas
Posts: 22674
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2015 10:57 pm
Location: Working From Home

LeTiss 4pm wrote:Hate Windows 10, it's the biggest pile of shit.....since....well Windows 8.1

I still have Windows 7 on my desktop PC and it's a much better operating system
Im with you on that one!
User avatar
andrejt
Posts: 153
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2014 2:59 pm
Location: Slovenia

LeTiss 4pm wrote: I still have Windows 7 on my desktop PC and it's a much better operating system
Same here! I'm an IT guy and would *strongly* suggest all users to stay on Win 7 or install it if you don't have them ;)
Last edited by andrejt on Sat Mar 12, 2016 12:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
andrejt
Posts: 153
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2014 2:59 pm
Location: Slovenia

Bet Angel wrote:It's just a cost benefit decision. The cost of development, testing, documentation updates, compared to how much it improves the product as a whole. Sometimes a change requested by a few people could confuse the majority of users and actually lessen the value of the product; causing issues for the support team.

[...]
Thanks for the explanation. You're doing a great job, keep it up!
User avatar
Tuco
Posts: 727
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 1:43 pm

viewtopic.php?f=20&t=10969

...and hopefully someone at BA can look through the possible updates in the above 'In-Play Trader' Updates link in the near future.
kerberus
Posts: 366
Joined: Mon Aug 05, 2013 3:28 pm

Ah Ah! I've got a disk mirror of my win7 that I can go back to the future with (has anybody got a spare De Lorean). Yeah chaps you're right Win 10 sucks. It keeps updating slyly behind your back tries to contact the MS pseudo gods every move you make and grumble moan whinge and whine (oops that me)
going back to win7
1f609[1].png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
guy333
Posts: 52
Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2015 9:47 am

I still think an option to cancel all other rules when greening up in automation would be sensible.

I am still having problems where I think I have successfully greened up for a profit but another rule fires and I am back into a loss.
User avatar
Euler
Posts: 24701
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 1:39 pm
Location: Bet Angel HQ

The best way to overcome that is to make the rule conditional on that.
Rinoa
Posts: 85
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2013 7:38 pm

Euler wrote:The best way to overcome that is to make the rule conditional on that.
Could you provide an example of that please Euler?
guy333
Posts: 52
Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2015 9:47 am

Euler wrote:The best way to overcome that is to make the rule conditional on that.
You can only make it conditional on the green up if you know exactly what the position is after the "green up".

The green up might be £5 it may be £2.51 or £0.22 or even -£1.50.
Bet Angel
Bet Angel
Bet Angel
Posts: 3999
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 3:47 pm

guy333 wrote:You can only make it conditional on the green up if you know exactly what the position is after the "green up".
A future planned enhancement will be flexible enough to solve this problem and a few others that have been mentioned in the last few months.
PeterLe
Posts: 3715
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 3:19 pm

Ive created a hsortcut to close the trade (using reverse prices) and assisgned to keypad 0 and has already served me well..

I was wondering if there is any intention to be able to call theses shortcuts from guardian itself as a rule? (Or even if its possible?)
Thanks
Regards
Peter
Bet Angel
Bet Angel
Bet Angel
Posts: 3999
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 3:47 pm

We wouldn't link a rule into the shortcuts directly, as a lot of them rely on the context of knowing where the mouse is (current market/selection/bet etc). However if the shortcut gives access to something in the Bet Angel infrastructure that Automation does not, then we could look to add it to Automation also.

The close trade at a reverse price shortcut that you mention would generally be seen as a manual activity, because it lessens the chances of actually achieving the price (balanced against the increase profit in doing so); it requires monitoring/decision/intervention to ensure the trade closure. Not ideally suited to Automation where most customers expect Close Trade to just do what it says on the tin (with the highest chance of success), but I can see it would be useful if you are happy to handle the additional risk.
PeterLe
Posts: 3715
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 3:19 pm

Hi
Thanks for the reply.
Might be worthwhile putting in the back burner for now then?
I thought of it as an interim solution (as there may be a "close trade using reverse pricing" in guardian in the future (I know there are only so many hours in a day and you guys cant implement every request made in the suggestions thread, everthing has to be prioritised)
Just off the top of my head; i cant think of any other shortcuts called from guardian that would be of use?)
Anyway, thanks again
regards
Peter
PS been running this version for a few days now; rock solid as always
User avatar
andrejt
Posts: 153
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2014 2:59 pm
Location: Slovenia

phil wrote:The volume and percentage in the ladder is handy addition but do we really need the pound sign and the brackets. With my setup if the volume goes over the 100,000 I already lose the last bracket,to remove these would leave a much cleaner look, we dont have £ signs in the stake boxes and anyone not sure what currency it is can see from the total matched line above. Thanks
+1 from me on this one

Image
Post Reply

Return to “Bet Angel - Release & version history”