Updated: New beta version of Bet Angel v1.53.1 - Now on general release

Post Reply
Bet Angel
Bet Angel
Bet Angel
Posts: 3999
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 3:47 pm

BrianDee wrote:
Wed Sep 11, 2019 9:28 am
And now, perhaps we can look forward to OR conditional handling??
Actually now that we've added the arrows to re-order the conditions, that would make supporting the OR'ing of conditions more feasible.
Up to now conditions have all been AND'd together, but perhaps we can add a grouping separator into the list so that only one group of conditions has to test True for the rule to trigger.

i.e. We'd be able to support: (a AND b AND c) OR (d AND e) OR (f AND g AND h)
(letters representing different conditions that you've configured)

So the conditions list might look like:
a
b
c
<OR group separator>
d
e
<OR group separator>
f
g
h

Would that be useful?
Bet Angel
Bet Angel
Bet Angel
Posts: 3999
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 3:47 pm

billbo001 wrote:
Wed Sep 11, 2019 10:57 am
Just updating on my vps. Wasn't loading up, went through trouble shooting and came up with this?
We've re-tested on a similar VPS and it's installing without problem, so please restart the VPS and download the beta again and try to install.
If the problem persists then please contact support and we can arrange access to your VPS so that we can take a look.
Bet Angel
Bet Angel
Bet Angel
Posts: 3999
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 3:47 pm

49ers wrote:
Wed Sep 11, 2019 12:17 pm
Would it be possible to add or modify the P&L selectable column into the ladder area to display a solid colour of green or red to show how the trade is doing overall.
Yes that's possible if there's enough demand for the enhancement - it might be worth raising it in the suggestions section so that it attracts some +1's from others.
49ers
Posts: 66
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2018 1:35 pm

Bet Angel wrote:
Wed Sep 11, 2019 2:19 pm
49ers wrote:
Wed Sep 11, 2019 12:17 pm
Would it be possible to add or modify the P&L selectable column into the ladder area to display a solid colour of green or red to show how the trade is doing overall.
Yes that's possible if there's enough demand for the enhancement - it might be worth raising it in the suggestions section so that it attracts some +1's from others.
Thanks - I'll move it to the Suggestions area
BrianDee
Posts: 47
Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2018 3:57 pm

Bet Angel wrote:
Wed Sep 11, 2019 2:14 pm

We'd be able to support: (a AND b AND c) OR (d AND e) OR (f AND g AND h)
(letters representing different conditions that you've configured)

So the conditions list might look like:
a
b
c
<OR group separator>
d
e
<OR group separator>
f
g
h

Would that be useful?
Yes it would thanks 8-)
User avatar
gsa
Posts: 64
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2014 4:59 pm

Bet Angel wrote:
Wed Sep 11, 2019 2:14 pm
BrianDee wrote:
Wed Sep 11, 2019 9:28 am
And now, perhaps we can look forward to OR conditional handling??
Actually now that we've added the arrows to re-order the conditions, that would make supporting the OR'ing of conditions more feasible.
Up to now conditions have all been AND'd together, but perhaps we can add a grouping separator into the list so that only one group of conditions has to test True for the rule to trigger.

i.e. We'd be able to support: (a AND b AND c) OR (d AND e) OR (f AND g AND h)
(letters representing different conditions that you've configured)

So the conditions list might look like:
a
b
c
<OR group separator>
d
e
<OR group separator>
f
g
h

Would that be useful?
This would be a great thing to have!
KJLP60
Posts: 24
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2018 8:46 am

I think it has been mentioned in suggestions, But is it possible to add a close trade on selection with greening at prices other than best & reverse? I would love to be able to set the price with a stored value so variable offsets can be used.

Thanks on the latest update, the support for this product is sensational
User avatar
mcgoo
Posts: 898
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2013 12:30 pm

KJLP60 wrote:
Mon Sep 16, 2019 6:47 am
I think it has been mentioned in suggestions, But is it possible to add a close trade on selection with greening at prices other than best & reverse? I would love to be able to set the price with a stored value so variable offsets can be used.

Thanks on the latest update, the support for this product is sensational
Seconded. And ditto re latest updates.Loving the matched bet SV's and the != .... :ugeek:
Also agree as previously mentioned on the OR conditions... when you get time to scratch yourselves :)
Great work!
BetBuddy
Posts: 153
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2019 3:23 pm

gsa wrote:
Sun Sep 15, 2019 8:59 pm
Bet Angel wrote:
Wed Sep 11, 2019 2:14 pm
BrianDee wrote:
Wed Sep 11, 2019 9:28 am
And now, perhaps we can look forward to OR conditional handling??
Actually now that we've added the arrows to re-order the conditions, that would make supporting the OR'ing of conditions more feasible.
Up to now conditions have all been AND'd together, but perhaps we can add a grouping separator into the list so that only one group of conditions has to test True for the rule to trigger.

i.e. We'd be able to support: (a AND b AND c) OR (d AND e) OR (f AND g AND h)
(letters representing different conditions that you've configured)

So the conditions list might look like:
a
b
c
<OR group separator>
d
e
<OR group separator>
f
g
h

Would that be useful?
This would be a great thing to have!
+1

Also can we have >= and <= comparison ?
BetBuddy
Posts: 153
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2019 3:23 pm

Can we get the adjustments added on the left for the Stored Value comparisons ?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
gsa
Posts: 64
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2014 4:59 pm

To continue the wish list:

At the moment all conditions in a rule file only have a positive outcome (IF Condition fullfield = TRUE)

So If I have 3 conditions all have to be TRUE to trigger the rule. So only TRUE + TRUE + TRUE => Rule TRUE

It would be amazing to have the possibility to go for a negative outcome (IF Condition is not fullfield = FALSE)

So you could have rule sets like this

Condition 1 has to be TRUE
Condition 2 has to be FALSE
Condition 3 has to be TRUE
Condition 4 has to be FALSE

=> Rule = TRUE

This would make the conditions much more powerful and complex bots often way easier to set up. Take for example the Tennis Fixed Scores condition or the Signals Value condition and so on. At the moment you often have to use work arounds.
For example: You want a signal not to have the value of 5, you need a condition 1) signal > 4 and a condition 2) signal < 6.

Some conditions (like "Tennis Serving") already do have a FALSE (Tennis Serving: "Selection is NOT serving"), but it would be better to have this for all conditions.

Thanks

Georg
Bet Angel
Bet Angel
Bet Angel
Posts: 3999
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 3:47 pm

gsa wrote:
Wed Sep 18, 2019 9:31 pm
To continue the wish list:

...

So you could have rule sets like this

Condition 1 has to be TRUE
Condition 2 has to be FALSE
Condition 3 has to be TRUE
Condition 4 has to be FALSE

...
OK, that's a different angle to the initial idea of groups of conditions being OR'd together, but I understand the request.
We'll see what we can do to create a flexible solution that pushes Automation forward and helps everyone.
Bet Angel
Bet Angel
Bet Angel
Posts: 3999
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 3:47 pm

BetBuddy wrote:
Wed Sep 18, 2019 2:12 pm
Can we get the adjustments added on the left for the Stored Value comparisons ?
It looks like plus and minus adjustments are displayed properly in the description, but not multiply or divide.
We'll look into that.
BetBuddy
Posts: 153
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2019 3:23 pm

Bet Angel wrote:
Thu Sep 19, 2019 3:15 pm
BetBuddy wrote:
Wed Sep 18, 2019 2:12 pm
Can we get the adjustments added on the left for the Stored Value comparisons ?
It looks like plus and minus adjustments are displayed properly in the description, but not multiply or divide.
We'll look into that.
Many thanks,
BetBuddy
Posts: 153
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2019 3:23 pm

Bet Angel wrote:
Thu Sep 19, 2019 3:15 pm
BetBuddy wrote:
Wed Sep 18, 2019 2:12 pm
Can we get the adjustments added on the left for the Stored Value comparisons ?
It looks like plus and minus adjustments are displayed properly in the description, but not multiply or divide.
We'll look into that.
Could it also show what type of adjustment it is:

+ £100
- £100
+ 100%
- 100%
* 1%
* 3
/ 3

etc
Post Reply

Return to “Bet Angel - Release & version history”