Is 'ALL LS AVAILABLE' a text stored value? I had a similar issue with reporting to Guardian and the solution was to tag an SV to it.Dabbla wrote: ↑Fri Nov 05, 2021 1:20 pmValue based setting bug
If you look at the guardian column (LS AVIL), you will see lots of pink highlights, they should not be there.
If you look at the (value based setting) they should be orange. That part is working fine.
It seems that values under 0.1 are getting highlighted for some reason. The strange thing is the darker the colour the less of the pink highlights there are.
For example the lightest colour highlight 0 >0.09, the second lightest colour only highlights 0 > 0.04
Re creating the (value based setting) does not appear to fix the issue
Recreating the guardian custom column does appear to fix the issue.( Far column)
gcoubug1.PNG
New beta version of Bet Angel v1.57.0 - Now on general release
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Was the column already loaded into Guardian showing a value before you defined or assigned the Value Based Colour?
If so, try removing all the markets from Guardian and adding them again to see if it sorts it out. I'm just thinking that if the value in the cell hasn't changed it hasn't had reason to redraw and therefore hasn't looked up the new colouring assignment.
The column was probably loaded before I originally added the value based colour. The file was created a while ago but I only noticed it last night. Then started testing.Bet Angel wrote: ↑Fri Nov 05, 2021 2:26 pm
Was the column already loaded into Guardian showing a value before you defined or assigned the Value Based Colour?
If so, try removing all the markets from Guardian and adding them again to see if it sorts it out. I'm just thinking that if the value in the cell hasn't changed it hasn't had reason to redraw and therefore hasn't looked up the new colouring assignment.
I have deleted all markets from guardian, saved with no markets, restarted BA and they still appear . The pink cells do clear if the value is over 0.04 but then reappear pink when under 0.05.
@Derek27
No ,standard SV .
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Could you export your Guardian List Layout, your Custom Column Profile, and that Value Based Colour profile and send all three files to support (or zip them up and upload here) we'll test them here and debug the code alongside them if we see the same effect. Thanks
Hi, I wonder if there have been any changes with the use of "," and "." when writing for example 0,06. 0,06 in my old code appear as 6.00 in 1.57 but when i change to 0.06, it appears as 0.06. If i try 5,2 it changes that to 52. Anyone else get the same error? Or am I doing something wrong?
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2022 11:44 am
How can you update to v1.57.0 beta2? Because for some reasons is invalid.
The latest version is now V1.58 which can be downloaded from the Bet Angel websitebraveangel wrote: ↑Mon Feb 21, 2022 12:01 pmHow can you update to v1.57.0 beta2? Because for some reasons is invalid.
https://www.betangel.com/download/?product=BetAngelPro
Hi,
I've been trying to get my automation to skip races that have reserves in the greyhound races. I've been using the txt comparison condition but when the greyhound gets changed on the day maybe a few hours before the race, all I get is a blank name so it has nothing to look for to tell it to skip, but when I've looked on the Betfair website there is a name there, just not on Bet Angel. Is this a glitch?
I've been trying to get my automation to skip races that have reserves in the greyhound races. I've been using the txt comparison condition but when the greyhound gets changed on the day maybe a few hours before the race, all I get is a blank name so it has nothing to look for to tell it to skip, but when I've looked on the Betfair website there is a name there, just not on Bet Angel. Is this a glitch?
Store all the selections as text, you can use then use the condition (stored value set condition) is not set with a value.
That will filter out the markets that have blank names.
Im not 100% about this but
It’s not really a glitch, I think the names only get added when you add a market to guardian.
For example if you was to remove a market then add it back it should have the new name.
That will filter out the markets that have blank names.
Im not 100% about this but
It’s not really a glitch, I think the names only get added when you add a market to guardian.
For example if you was to remove a market then add it back it should have the new name.
You are correct in that last part, if BF make any changes to the market it needs to be search for and added again for the changes to showDabbla wrote: ↑Wed Mar 01, 2023 2:43 pmStore all the selections as text, you can use then use the condition (stored value set condition) is not set with a value.
That will filter out the markets that have blank names.
Im not 100% about this but
It’s not really a glitch, I think the names only get added when you add a market to guardian.
For example if you was to remove a market then add it back it should have the new name.
It did cross my mind to record the selections names for a txt comparison condition but I was hoping for an easier way as it means inputting a lot of selections. I guess I will just have to make sure I check guardian routinely. or find a quick way to input all the selections.
Thanks for the response
Thanks for the response
Have a look at this file, it does pretty much what you after.
If you add Guardian alert 5 to Guardian, you will get an alert (reserve). You can use this rule to trigger your don’t bet rule.
Rule 2 stores the selections , the closer you start the file to the off the better the result.
I have had to add a delay to rule 2 and 3, this is because I was getting some false results.
Have a play and see if it suites what you want.
If you add Guardian alert 5 to Guardian, you will get an alert (reserve). You can use this rule to trigger your don’t bet rule.
Rule 2 stores the selections , the closer you start the file to the off the better the result.
I have had to add a delay to rule 2 and 3, this is because I was getting some false results.
Have a play and see if it suites what you want.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- ShaunWhite
- Posts: 9731
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 3:42 am
Not worth a request thread of its own...
Is there any chance of putting a 321 button on the Ladder View on too? I have my bf price charts under the corresponding ladders so scrolling right to see the outsiders leaves them incorrectly associated.
Is there any chance of putting a 321 button on the Ladder View on too? I have my bf price charts under the corresponding ladders so scrolling right to see the outsiders leaves them incorrectly associated.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Embedding them would probably help better with this?ShaunWhite wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 3:31 pmNot worth a request thread of its own...
Is there any chance of putting a 321 button on the Ladder View on too?
Screenshot_4.jpg
I have my bf price charts under the corresponding ladders so scrolling right to see the outsiders leaves them incorrectly associated.Screenshot_6.jpg
https://www.betangel.com/user-guide/emb ... harts.html