Today's Horse Racing
- Realrocknrolla
- Posts: 1903
- Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2020 7:15 pm
Hollie Doyle must be getting some at home
If she is it isn't from Tom, he's in Sydney
- Realrocknrolla
- Posts: 1903
- Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2020 7:15 pm
- Realrocknrolla
- Posts: 1903
- Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2020 7:15 pm
Also, Chris M has 5 out of 6 in the ITV 7 tonight with one to go. So potentially 6/7 but he never picked Hollie in 17:10 on Rosie Powers, could of won the JP tonight. Close.
Unsure what his username is on here.
Unsure what his username is on here.
- beermonsterman
- Posts: 522
- Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2016 2:47 pm
- Location: Birmingham UK
I did dismally last roundRealrocknrolla wrote: ↑Mon Mar 08, 2021 7:32 pmAlso, Chris M has 5 out of 6 in the ITV 7 tonight with one to go. So potentially 6/7 but he never picked Hollie in 17:10 on Rosie Powers, could of won the JP tonight. Close.
Unsure what his username is on here.
-
- Posts: 533
- Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2017 7:27 pm
Just had a conversation with a punter, who backed a runner at 50/1 on Betfred that went on to win.
I'm trying to show them that exchange betting is the way, and that the same runner was between 70 and 113/1.
Their response "Yes, but I might not have backed it if I'd seen those odds."
Can someone ELI5 why that is a ridiculous argument please?
I'm trying to show them that exchange betting is the way, and that the same runner was between 70 and 113/1.
Their response "Yes, but I might not have backed it if I'd seen those odds."
Can someone ELI5 why that is a ridiculous argument please?
Sadly this type of ignorance is common place. It would be more productive to stir soup with a fork than explain the benefits of exchanges to most punters.arbitrage16 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 11, 2021 12:04 pmJust had a conversation with a punter, who backed a runner at 50/1 on Betfred that went on to win.
I'm trying to show them that exchange betting is the way, and that the same runner was between 70 and 113/1.
Their response "Yes, but I might not have backed it if I'd seen those odds."
Can someone ELI5 why that is a ridiculous argument please?
Heard many excuses for not using an exchange but thats the first time I think I've heard that oneANGELS15 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 11, 2021 12:57 pmSadly this type of ignorance is common place. It would be more productive to stir soup with a fork than explain the benefits of exchanges to most punters.arbitrage16 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 11, 2021 12:04 pmJust had a conversation with a punter, who backed a runner at 50/1 on Betfred that went on to win.
I'm trying to show them that exchange betting is the way, and that the same runner was between 70 and 113/1.
Their response "Yes, but I might not have backed it if I'd seen those odds."
Can someone ELI5 why that is a ridiculous argument please?
Show them that every runner in every race is a bigger price on the exchange and then they'll give up betting.arbitrage16 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 11, 2021 12:04 pmJust had a conversation with a punter, who backed a runner at 50/1 on Betfred that went on to win.
I'm trying to show them that exchange betting is the way, and that the same runner was between 70 and 113/1.
Their response "Yes, but I might not have backed it if I'd seen those odds."
Can someone ELI5 why that is a ridiculous argument please?
Good to be back on the UK horses for the first time in weeks, with a dull football programme today.