Today's Horse Racing

The sport of kings.
Post Reply
JTEDL
Posts: 536
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2017 2:21 pm

8/8 favourites won so far today
User avatar
Euler
Posts: 24801
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 1:39 pm
Location: Bet Angel HQ

Enemenemynemo_37659221_14_35_22.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
Headless Chuck
Posts: 39
Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2019 5:31 pm

Something amiss with Wetherby?
User avatar
Realrocknrolla
Posts: 1903
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2020 7:15 pm

Hollie Doyle must be getting some at home 😉🍆
User avatar
Naffman
Posts: 5636
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2013 5:46 am

Realrocknrolla wrote:
Mon Mar 08, 2021 6:14 pm
Hollie Doyle must be getting some at home 😉🍆
If she is it isn't from Tom, he's in Sydney :lol: :?
wilf
Posts: 289
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2016 7:34 pm

What a market the 18:40 was, did anyone get on Jeans Maite :)

Those 1.01 backers got a scare :o
User avatar
Realrocknrolla
Posts: 1903
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2020 7:15 pm

Naffman wrote:
Mon Mar 08, 2021 6:32 pm
Realrocknrolla wrote:
Mon Mar 08, 2021 6:14 pm
Hollie Doyle must be getting some at home 😉🍆
If she is it isn't from Tom, he's in Sydney :lol: :?
🤣🤣🤣

🤭🤭🤭

👋👋👋
User avatar
Realrocknrolla
Posts: 1903
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2020 7:15 pm

Also, Chris M has 5 out of 6 in the ITV 7 tonight with one to go. So potentially 6/7 but he never picked Hollie in 17:10 on Rosie Powers, could of won the JP tonight. Close.

Unsure what his username is on here.
User avatar
beermonsterman
Posts: 522
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2016 2:47 pm
Location: Birmingham UK

Realrocknrolla wrote:
Mon Mar 08, 2021 7:32 pm
Also, Chris M has 5 out of 6 in the ITV 7 tonight with one to go. So potentially 6/7 but he never picked Hollie in 17:10 on Rosie Powers, could of won the JP tonight. Close.

Unsure what his username is on here.
I did dismally last round :lol: :lol: :lol:
daveyp9
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2019 10:55 am

Does anybody elses ladders/prices seem abit sticky today and not very 'smooth'?
Snaff
Posts: 172
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2021 8:26 pm

daveyp9 wrote:
Wed Mar 10, 2021 2:54 pm
Does anybody elses ladders/prices seem abit sticky today and not very 'smooth'?
Mine seemed pretty decent, maybe slightly sticky at times. I think it’s something on Betfair’s end. The is a thread about these issues somewhere on here.
arbitrage16
Posts: 533
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2017 7:27 pm

Just had a conversation with a punter, who backed a runner at 50/1 on Betfred that went on to win.

I'm trying to show them that exchange betting is the way, and that the same runner was between 70 and 113/1.

Their response "Yes, but I might not have backed it if I'd seen those odds."

Can someone ELI5 why that is a ridiculous argument please?
User avatar
ANGELS15
Posts: 848
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2017 9:57 am

arbitrage16 wrote:
Thu Mar 11, 2021 12:04 pm
Just had a conversation with a punter, who backed a runner at 50/1 on Betfred that went on to win.

I'm trying to show them that exchange betting is the way, and that the same runner was between 70 and 113/1.

Their response "Yes, but I might not have backed it if I'd seen those odds."

Can someone ELI5 why that is a ridiculous argument please?
Sadly this type of ignorance is common place. It would be more productive to stir soup with a fork than explain the benefits of exchanges to most punters.
User avatar
Dallas
Posts: 22708
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2015 10:57 pm
Location: Working From Home

ANGELS15 wrote:
Thu Mar 11, 2021 12:57 pm
arbitrage16 wrote:
Thu Mar 11, 2021 12:04 pm
Just had a conversation with a punter, who backed a runner at 50/1 on Betfred that went on to win.

I'm trying to show them that exchange betting is the way, and that the same runner was between 70 and 113/1.

Their response "Yes, but I might not have backed it if I'd seen those odds."

Can someone ELI5 why that is a ridiculous argument please?
Sadly this type of ignorance is common place. It would be more productive to stir soup with a fork than explain the benefits of exchanges to most punters.
Heard many excuses for not using an exchange but thats the first time I think I've heard that one :roll:
User avatar
Derek27
Posts: 23614
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2017 11:44 am
Location: UK

arbitrage16 wrote:
Thu Mar 11, 2021 12:04 pm
Just had a conversation with a punter, who backed a runner at 50/1 on Betfred that went on to win.

I'm trying to show them that exchange betting is the way, and that the same runner was between 70 and 113/1.

Their response "Yes, but I might not have backed it if I'd seen those odds."

Can someone ELI5 why that is a ridiculous argument please?
Show them that every runner in every race is a bigger price on the exchange and then they'll give up betting. :)

Good to be back on the UK horses for the first time in weeks, with a dull football programme today.
Post Reply

Return to “Trading Horse racing”