Simple Scalping Servant
sir thank you very much for your hard work ,ive taken most your advice and read the threads saying i can modifie the automation,ive tried and not getting anywhere i dont think ,ive attach a file which ive done please can you give it a few mins and some tips
please help dont know where im going wrong on automating
its suppose to back under 3.5 goals when a goals scored within first 30 mins of the game , minimum price is >1.5,and a 2 tick either side of under 3.5 goals,then greenup for 12 %,or redup for 20% lossplease help dont know where im going wrong on automating
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Hi,
I've slightly modified this servant into 2 servants, a back 1st and a lay 1st servant. I've also added a rule to trigger only when either servant has less than 50% less money on the opposing side, at the LTP.
I would be grateful if anyone more knowledgeable than myself, could double check that I've got my modifications right.
And a big thankyou to all the forum posters who have shared their servant and automation files. It's a big help having a template as a starting point.
Waywyrd.
I've slightly modified this servant into 2 servants, a back 1st and a lay 1st servant. I've also added a rule to trigger only when either servant has less than 50% less money on the opposing side, at the LTP.
I would be grateful if anyone more knowledgeable than myself, could double check that I've got my modifications right.
And a big thankyou to all the forum posters who have shared their servant and automation files. It's a big help having a template as a starting point.
Waywyrd.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
The Stored Value Condition is testing the money traded at the best back price against the best lay price (not LTP) and vice versa for the other servantwaywyrd wrote: ↑Sat Aug 06, 2022 4:47 pmHi,
I've slightly modified this servant into 2 servants, a back 1st and a lay 1st servant. I've also added a rule to trigger only when either servant has less than 50% less money on the opposing side, at the LTP.
I would be grateful if anyone more knowledgeable than myself, could double check that I've got my modifications right.
Test Back Scalping.baf
Test Lay Scalping.baf
And a big thankyou to all the forum posters who have shared their servant and automation files. It's a big help having a template as a starting point.
Waywyrd.
But both appearing to be triggering correctly when that condition is met?
Thanks Dallas. Changed the The Stored Value Condition to LTP, and now working as intended.Dallas wrote: ↑Wed Aug 17, 2022 3:30 pmThe Stored Value Condition is testing the money traded at the best back price against the best lay price (not LTP) and vice versa for the other servantwaywyrd wrote: ↑Sat Aug 06, 2022 4:47 pmHi,
I've slightly modified this servant into 2 servants, a back 1st and a lay 1st servant. I've also added a rule to trigger only when either servant has less than 50% less money on the opposing side, at the LTP.
I would be grateful if anyone more knowledgeable than myself, could double check that I've got my modifications right.
Test Back Scalping.baf
Test Lay Scalping.baf
And a big thankyou to all the forum posters who have shared their servant and automation files. It's a big help having a template as a starting point.
Waywyrd.
But both appearing to be triggering correctly when that condition is met?
Waywyrd.
Hi
I am trying to adapt this servant to stake to Back Book %.
As it stands with my mods it places a back and lay bet at the same time. I have been trying to sort this out for a while and wondered if anyone could have a quick look and see what I am doing wrong please.
Thanks
I am trying to adapt this servant to stake to Back Book %.
As it stands with my mods it places a back and lay bet at the same time. I have been trying to sort this out for a while and wondered if anyone could have a quick look and see what I am doing wrong please.
Thanks
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.