Martingale Challenge

[kahin]

I actually know math well.
I'm developing a betting algorithm
because my profession is data specialist
I did not deposit money on previous matches
but i will invest in the next
right before your eyes.

Sure. That effort was merely an undeclared trial.

We believe you.

But the real question is - do you like apples?

yes I like apples

[kahin]

I prepared a professional algorithm My aim is to profit from this system

once in hole , using a grenade to dig is a bad idea !


practice without vision.gif


no algorithm or professional developer can dig you out .

The betting system is based on mathematics.
And I will do with it
I respect every idea and thought

[weemac]

Good luck kahin! I look forward to popping in later to see how you're getting on.

[kahin]

Good luck kahin! I look forward to popping in later to see how you're getting on.

I will explain all the details of the system
I want to know different ideas
because i need this

[weemac]

Good luck kahin! I look forward to popping in later to see how you're getting on.

I will explain all the details of the system
I want to know different ideas
because i need this

OK, well the only idea I can offer is that in over 40 years of watching, I've never seen a Martingale system make anyone happy.

[kahin]

Good luck kahin! I look forward to popping in later to see how you're getting on.

I will explain all the details of the system
I want to know different ideas
because i need this

OK, well the only idea I can offer is that in over 40 years of watching, I've never seen a Martingale system make anyone happy.

bookies are usually very afraid of martingale
This system makes more sense to me than making combined coupons.

[weemac]

Yes, bookies ARE afraid of martingale-type bets. That's why they won't accept them.

What will you do when that happens?

[agog]

I am interested as to your initial stake size and the size of your bank....

If every bet you place is at Evens and you only wish to make a £2 profit once one bet wins, then your 10th bet in a losing sequence would be £1024 (I might be out with that calculation but you get the idea). Anyone who thinks a sequence of 10 losing even-money bets doesn't occur is sorely mistaken.

You would therefore need a comparatively massive bank just for a £2 per sequence profit and there's no guarantee you can get your bets on when the stakes are increased dramatically.

Do not proceed with this venture. Even if you make a small profit, it would only be through sheer luck.

[decomez6]

stephen hawkins black holes are based on mathematical models .
good luck finding one.
my advice :
keep track of the most rare events then deploy a conservative system.

[kahin]

Yes, bookies ARE afraid of martingale-type bets. That's why they won't accept them.

What will you do when that happens?

my purpose is to share the algorithm
and make a profit

[kahin]

I am interested as to your initial stake size and the size of your bank....

If every bet you place is at Evens and you only wish to make a £2 profit once one bet wins, then your 10th bet in a losing sequence would be £1024 (I might be out with that calculation but you get the idea). Anyone who thinks a sequence of 10 losing even-money bets doesn't occur is sorely mistaken.

You would therefore need a comparatively massive bank just for a £2 per sequence profit and there's no guarantee you can get your bets on when the stakes are increased dramatically.

Do not proceed with this venture. Even if you make a small profit, it would only be through sheer luck.

changing algorithm matches between 3 and 4.5 percentage
profit rate between 100% and 140%
not 1.90 or 2 odds like classic roulette
There will be 2 odds and you will win the starting amount
they already know these simple things on this forum

[agog]

I am interested as to your initial stake size and the size of your bank....

If every bet you place is at Evens and you only wish to make a £2 profit once one bet wins, then your 10th bet in a losing sequence would be £1024 (I might be out with that calculation but you get the idea). Anyone who thinks a sequence of 10 losing even-money bets doesn't occur is sorely mistaken.

You would therefore need a comparatively massive bank just for a £2 per sequence profit and there's no guarantee you can get your bets on when the stakes are increased dramatically.

Do not proceed with this venture. Even if you make a small profit, it would only be through sheer luck.

changing algorithm matches between 3 and 4.5 percentage
profit rate between 100% and 140%
not 1.90 or 2 odds like classic roulette
There will be 2 odds and you will win the starting amount
they already know these simple things on this forum

Many thanks for pointing out that I don't know the 'simple things' that others do on this forum. I was actually trying to help with a simple example of how a martingale, in its most basic form, is non-viable.

Apologies - I now realise you are beyond help.....

[weemac]

my purpose is to share the algorithm
and make a profit
[/quote]

You mean other people take the pain and you take the money?

I'm out.

[decomez6]

my purpose is to share the algorithm
and make a profit

not a bad idea to keep the algorithm and keep all the profit .

devils is in the details.gif

[kahin]

I am interested as to your initial stake size and the size of your bank....

If every bet you place is at Evens and you only wish to make a £2 profit once one bet wins, then your 10th bet in a losing sequence would be £1024 (I might be out with that calculation but you get the idea). Anyone who thinks a sequence of 10 losing even-money bets doesn't occur is sorely mistaken.

You would therefore need a comparatively massive bank just for a £2 per sequence profit and there's no guarantee you can get your bets on when the stakes are increased dramatically.

Do not proceed with this venture. Even if you make a small profit, it would only be through sheer luck.

changing algorithm matches between 3 and 4.5 percentage
profit rate between 100% and 140%
not 1.90 or 2 odds like classic roulette
There will be 2 odds and you will win the starting amount
they already know these simple things on this forum

Many thanks for pointing out that I don't know the 'simple things' that others do on this forum. I was actually trying to help with a simple example of how a martingale, in its most basic form, is non-viable.

Apologies - I now realise you are beyond help.....

I'm just talking about the forum's effective connection with betting
I don't have any negative thoughts towards you