The problem I've found with using it for coding is stopping it running away with itself. l guess it thinks it's being helpful by designing something from scratch through to finished product without asking you if it's on the right track and more worrying without checking not just that it's good but making sure you understand what it doing and how. I find I have to keep asking it to explain what its doing and dragging it back to what I want. Yeah, it's ideas may be right or they may not and I want to be able to check which is which. I think getting it to code without explanation is very dangerous.Big Bad Barney wrote: ↑Sun Oct 26, 2025 8:26 pmIMO Claude Code (anthropic) is the go for coding atm. It's good because it has access to your filesystem. (Some people might care about privacy...I don't...)
You obviously wanna know what you are doing or it'll make a mess...but if it fks up, ya just revert and try again... It's exceptionally good at writing things from scratch, but gets less good as your app gets more complex or ambiguous. One ends up spending their time documenting coding standards, rather than actually coding....then it gets a bit boring repeating, 'follow this directive you...suck...get it right... ok thx'
But still 50% faster than doing it yourself....
ChatGPT is cheaper because one quickly ends up on the max plan with anthropic.
Edit: The real advantage of these tools is learning... learning to code is never just the syntax, it's the patterns and practices and architectures that REALLY take ages to learn.......IMO one would do well to short places like Pluralsight for learning those things.... that used to be the goto... LLM's do it better.
Thanks for the Claude tip, maybe I should check it out.
