That shouldn't be part of any demotion consideration. The decision should be purely based on whether the Stewards can be sure that the impeded horse would have beaten the offender if not for the interference. Whip in hand should only be relevant to the jockey sanction part of the enquiry.
Today's Horse Racing
- jamesedwards
- Posts: 6074
- Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2018 6:16 pm
- jamesedwards
- Posts: 6074
- Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2018 6:16 pm
First at Goodwood just now was significantly worse than yesterday.jamesedwards wrote: ↑Wed Jul 29, 2026 11:26 amRipon 20:10 on Monday. This isn't pocket talking, because this DQ made me a good few bob. But I've just seen the head-on for the first time and can't believe the winner was DQd for this. How can that possibly be justified?
https://x.com/AtTheRaces/status/2082039980424090002
Will be interesting to see what the Stewards do here.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- jamesedwards
- Posts: 6074
- Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2018 6:16 pm
Placings remain unaltered.jamesedwards wrote: ↑Wed Jul 29, 2026 1:58 pmFirst at Goodwood just now was significantly worse than yesterday.jamesedwards wrote: ↑Wed Jul 29, 2026 11:26 amRipon 20:10 on Monday. This isn't pocket talking, because this DQ made me a good few bob. But I've just seen the head-on for the first time and can't believe the winner was DQd for this. How can that possibly be justified?
https://x.com/AtTheRaces/status/2082039980424090002
Will be interesting to see what the Stewards do here.
z302.jpg
