he is 85 so we'll cut him some slack.Dallas wrote: ↑Thu Mar 11, 2021 2:02 pmHeard many excuses for not using an exchange but thats the first time I think I've heard that oneANGELS15 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 11, 2021 12:57 pmSadly this type of ignorance is common place. It would be more productive to stir soup with a fork than explain the benefits of exchanges to most punters.arbitrage16 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 11, 2021 12:04 pmJust had a conversation with a punter, who backed a runner at 50/1 on Betfred that went on to win.
I'm trying to show them that exchange betting is the way, and that the same runner was between 70 and 113/1.
Their response "Yes, but I might not have backed it if I'd seen those odds."
Can someone ELI5 why that is a ridiculous argument please?![]()
What I'm trying to understand is why that thinking is flawed - he thinks that the odds reflect the probability of it winning, presumably, so why is that incorrect?