I've noticed court-siders have been trading in between rallies and sometimes getting badly caught out.
Today's Tennis
Yep, must be a newbie at it
No chance would I try and pre-empt the winner of a point if I was courtside, only if I could see the ball was going to be nowhere near in bounds.
Last 2 days though haven't seen the big stakes being dumped at wrong prices, must have burnt their fingers one too many times.
-
- Posts: 95
- Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2020 3:00 pm
This guy/girl has been at it all week in most of the fuzzies markets. Zero subtlety at all most of the time. Some serious moves in the lesser challenger markets to because of it.
The umpire has a computer screen.mishac wrote: ↑Thu Apr 15, 2021 8:13 amThey won't be court-siders. Most tournaments are now run without spectators. My view is that the days of court-siders has long gone
Which feeds straight to the ATP/WTA data rights holders, and that data is passed onto the betting agencies, which is where we get the scores. If you have a good system, the scores are only a second or so behind the umpire entering in the score. You might note available volume almost in sync with the scores, and possibly faster. That can't be court-siders because the delay to put up offers is still there. So by deduction, the fastest offers are put up by someone with no delay. That can't be court-siders (can only be one organisation, or a deal between that organisation and a syndicate)
I was just joking about the umpire placing bets on Betfair.mishac wrote: ↑Thu Apr 15, 2021 12:34 pmWhich feeds straight to the ATP/WTA data rights holders, and that data is passed onto the betting agencies, which is where we get the scores. If you have a good system, the scores are only a second or so behind the umpire entering in the score. You might note available volume almost in sync with the scores, and possibly faster. That can't be court-siders because the delay to put up offers is still there. So by deduction, the fastest offers are put up by someone with no delay. That can't be court-siders (can only be one organisation, or a deal between that organisation and a syndicate)
Umpires have been involved before: https://www.espn.com.au/tennis/story/_/ ... xing-probeDerek27 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 15, 2021 1:04 pmI was just joking about the umpire placing bets on Betfair.mishac wrote: ↑Thu Apr 15, 2021 12:34 pmWhich feeds straight to the ATP/WTA data rights holders, and that data is passed onto the betting agencies, which is where we get the scores. If you have a good system, the scores are only a second or so behind the umpire entering in the score. You might note available volume almost in sync with the scores, and possibly faster. That can't be court-siders because the delay to put up offers is still there. So by deduction, the fastest offers are put up by someone with no delay. That can't be court-siders (can only be one organisation, or a deal between that organisation and a syndicate)
"The Tennis Integrity Unit said Izotov, 22, failed to report a corrupt approach he received in November 2019 while he was officiating as a chair umpire at an ITF Women's event in Minsk, Belarus.
The approach allegedly offered him payment in return for delaying the inputting of scores to his scoring device, which would allow others to bet on matches"
I remember that one. I warned him of the consequences if he reports me.mishac wrote: ↑Thu Apr 15, 2021 1:30 pmUmpires have been involved before: https://www.espn.com.au/tennis/story/_/ ... xing-probeDerek27 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 15, 2021 1:04 pmI was just joking about the umpire placing bets on Betfair.mishac wrote: ↑Thu Apr 15, 2021 12:34 pm
Which feeds straight to the ATP/WTA data rights holders, and that data is passed onto the betting agencies, which is where we get the scores. If you have a good system, the scores are only a second or so behind the umpire entering in the score. You might note available volume almost in sync with the scores, and possibly faster. That can't be court-siders because the delay to put up offers is still there. So by deduction, the fastest offers are put up by someone with no delay. That can't be court-siders (can only be one organisation, or a deal between that organisation and a syndicate)
"The Tennis Integrity Unit said Izotov, 22, failed to report a corrupt approach he received in November 2019 while he was officiating as a chair umpire at an ITF Women's event in Minsk, Belarus.
The approach allegedly offered him payment in return for delaying the inputting of scores to his scoring device, which would allow others to bet on matches"
-
- Posts: 95
- Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2020 3:00 pm
How would i get in touch with Lee Cal (or someone else similar) to help build some automation?
JuiceyJones wrote: ↑Sun Apr 18, 2021 2:30 amHow would i get in touch with Lee Cal (or someone else similar) to help build some automation?
Lee is on Twitter. You can message him on there.
-
- Posts: 95
- Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2020 3:00 pm
Thanks Sniffersniffer66 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 18, 2021 7:03 amJuiceyJones wrote: ↑Sun Apr 18, 2021 2:30 amHow would i get in touch with Lee Cal (or someone else similar) to help build some automation?
Lee is on Twitter. You can message him on there.
Also happy to offer some advice if you outline what you are trying to do. Have some decent experience with tennis automation, if you've seen some of my previous posts. And Dallas has probably forgotten more than I'll ever knowJuiceyJones wrote: ↑Sun Apr 18, 2021 11:34 amThanks Sniffersniffer66 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 18, 2021 7:03 amJuiceyJones wrote: ↑Sun Apr 18, 2021 2:30 amHow would i get in touch with Lee Cal (or someone else similar) to help build some automation?
Lee is on Twitter. You can message him on there.