Derek27 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 12, 2021 5:07 pm
ShaunWhite wrote: ↑Mon Apr 12, 2021 4:37 pm
Kai wrote: ↑Mon Apr 12, 2021 4:26 pm
You don't???
I say, old bean! I must express my astonishment of your claim!
I propose a motion to ban this impostor at once!!!!!
If you dig a big enough hole....
I'd paid a shed load of commission before I made net profitable and I'm still at about 45% comm/gross lifetime.
Screenshot_17.png
I remember you mentioning you were gambling before and had a heavy loss, thereby not paying PC. That's the first thing I thought of when I saw LeTiss's post.
PC isn't the be all and end all. A Martingaler could be paying PC. You generally get a feel for who's talking sense by the nature and detail of their posts and how they respond to questions if suggestions are challenged. On top of that you'd have 40% PC payers who aren't fussed about the McDonald's gold star and don't bother sending in their proof.
LeTiss's kudos idea is plausible but it would only be useful to newbies if forumites used it only for trading specific matters and not because a forumite (who could potentially be a good trader) is talking utter bollocks about a non-trading matter, being impolite, etc.
I agree with you completely. The idea LeTiss put forward is imo a really good one. Sure it has some downside, I mean there is people who just hit like on every response no matter what, & it could be skewed towards liking the actual person but overall I think good content will get more likes.. therefore creating an area where we can search for content by most likes could help keep golden nuggets at the front end of the forum, rather than me behaving like a child.
I'm not so sure about a credibility system but if others think it's good then so be it. I think it haa potential to create division, a 2 group structure, the credibles & the fodder type situation... you're not credible so what you say doesn't hold weight attitude will almost certainly be created imo. Internally within the structure too, I pay more than you do so my opinion holds more credibility, I make that assumption because proving what you make will naturally create an invisible type list of top earners in comparison to bottom earners.
This is all I'm going to say on the matter, I don't want to argue, it's just my opinion & if others have different views I'll respectfully keep an open mind. Whatever happens, I can see the intention is to simply help improve content & I'm sure the team will make the right choice, they seem to have a proven record in good/positive improvements.