Having spent several years working on hundreds of automations across horses, dogs and football I am coming to the conclusion that even tiny adjustments in stake can have a devastating impact on ROI%.
Time after time after time I have something that roughly returns 100% or better only for it to plunge into loss the moment I dial up the stakes. So far I've always moved on to the next attempt figuring it was just my bad luck but I've reached the point where I figure I just can't be this unlucky.
Here's my latest example. 2,500 football markets over 11 days. Everything to the left of the red line is based on £5 stake, everything to the right is £10 stake.
This is just one example of dozens through the years. I'm eager to get the views of others. Is this an epiphany that I should have come to a long time ago or am I just doomed to eternity of bad luck? Can such small increases in stake really make that much difference to profitability?
Views please.
Impact of stake on automation
- jamesedwards
- Posts: 2324
- Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2018 6:16 pm
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
My views on this are in the scaling up section of my longer guidance post - viewtopic.php?f=17&t=23699
I find most markets quite sensitive to stake size, generally in proportion to volume and the Goldilocks principle tends to apply. Obviously experimenting is required to find the Goldilocks points for a particular strategy for a particular type of market.
I find most markets quite sensitive to stake size, generally in proportion to volume and the Goldilocks principle tends to apply. Obviously experimenting is required to find the Goldilocks points for a particular strategy for a particular type of market.
This is one of the most interesting discoveries one ends up making. The problem shifts slightly from "how do I identify value" to "how do I execute in meaningful size while retaining match rates and thwarting adverse selection as much as possible"
- ShaunWhite
- Posts: 9731
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 3:42 am
Have a crossover period when you're staking between £5 and £10 randomly rather than switching from one to the other, and produce a chart sorted by stake>date rather than just by date.
Date sorted PLs like your chart are ok for showing the effect over time but sorting by other things such as stake, price, time of day, day of week etc etc will tell you about those factors. Eg a PL sorted by price should trend evenly across the x-axis price range, but you might find those above or below a certain price point trend the opposite way. Date is interesting to a point and everyone produces date sorted PLSs, but they don't dig into what's actually making or losing money in the same way putting something other than date on the x-axis can.
Date sorted PLs like your chart are ok for showing the effect over time but sorting by other things such as stake, price, time of day, day of week etc etc will tell you about those factors. Eg a PL sorted by price should trend evenly across the x-axis price range, but you might find those above or below a certain price point trend the opposite way. Date is interesting to a point and everyone produces date sorted PLSs, but they don't dig into what's actually making or losing money in the same way putting something other than date on the x-axis can.
- jamesedwards
- Posts: 2324
- Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2018 6:16 pm
Done all this already to get a profitable automation as currently stands. But then up the stakes and wallop!ShaunWhite wrote: ↑Mon Jun 07, 2021 3:05 pmDate sorted PLs like your chart are ok for showing the effect over time but sorting by other things such as stake, price, time of day, day of week etc etc will tell you about those factors. Eg a PL sorted by price should trend evenly across the x-axis price range, but you might find those above or below a certain price point trend the opposite way. Date is interesting to a point and everyone produces date sorted PLSs, but they don't dig into what's actually making or losing money in the same way putting something other than date on the x-axis can.
That's a plan. Will try this.ShaunWhite wrote: ↑Mon Jun 07, 2021 3:05 pmHave a crossover period when you're staking between £5 and £10 randomly rather than switching from one to the other, and produce a chart sorted by stake>date rather than just by date.
- jamesedwards
- Posts: 2324
- Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2018 6:16 pm
Thanks for all comments and suggestions so far. Very interesting!
Stake back down to £5 today and lo-and-behold it has been profitable again so far.
Stake back down to £5 today and lo-and-behold it has been profitable again so far.
Now it comes down to how can you get more of those £5 stakes matched (you might find you can make more money by reducing that stake further)jamesedwards wrote: ↑Mon Jun 07, 2021 6:31 pmThanks for all comments and suggestions so far. Very interesting!
Stake back down to £5 today and lo-and-behold it has been profitable again so far.
- jamesedwards
- Posts: 2324
- Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2018 6:16 pm
Problem is I'm much more interested in churning volume (to generate Commission towards Premium Charge) than making profit.LinusP wrote: ↑Mon Jun 07, 2021 7:01 pmNow it comes down to how can you get more of those £5 stakes matched (you might find you can make more money by reducing that stake further)jamesedwards wrote: ↑Mon Jun 07, 2021 6:31 pmThanks for all comments and suggestions so far. Very interesting!
Stake back down to £5 today and lo-and-behold it has been profitable again so far.
Chasing 40% instead of straight 60?jamesedwards wrote: ↑Mon Jun 07, 2021 7:08 pmProblem is I'm much more interested in churning volume (to generate Commission towards Premium Charge) than making profit.LinusP wrote: ↑Mon Jun 07, 2021 7:01 pmNow it comes down to how can you get more of those £5 stakes matched (you might find you can make more money by reducing that stake further)jamesedwards wrote: ↑Mon Jun 07, 2021 6:31 pmThanks for all comments and suggestions so far. Very interesting!
Stake back down to £5 today and lo-and-behold it has been profitable again so far.
- jamesedwards
- Posts: 2324
- Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2018 6:16 pm
Indeed!LinusP wrote: ↑Mon Jun 07, 2021 8:04 pmChasing 40% instead of straight 60?jamesedwards wrote: ↑Mon Jun 07, 2021 7:08 pmProblem is I'm much more interested in churning volume (to generate Commission towards Premium Charge) than making profit.
- jamesedwards
- Posts: 2324
- Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2018 6:16 pm
Amazing. Exact same automation now back in consistent profit since moved back to £5 stakes.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.