Left wing labour activists have handed over more information to the police.
I assume they are Corbin supporters.
PMQs should be entertaining this week.
boris and rishi partygate fines
-
- Posts: 3193
- Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2019 8:25 am
- Location: Newport
- firlandsfarm
- Posts: 2688
- Joined: Sat May 03, 2014 8:20 am
- firlandsfarm
- Posts: 2688
- Joined: Sat May 03, 2014 8:20 am
... sounds like there's one rule for Captain Hindsight and Cruella and another rule for everyone else!Derek27 wrote: ↑Sun May 08, 2022 1:49 pmI never call somebody a liar unless it's clear cut. Denying any knowledge of a party you've been to or denying knowing you're at a party is lying, plain and simple. Labour back-stabbers are out and I've heard reports of people present saying they didn't go back to work after the curry and beer and there were people present who weren't working and just turned up to a social gathering but it's yet to be verified.
I'm getting sick of hearing the term 'beergate'. It's only an accusation and as such, doesn't fit the criteria to be called a 'gate'.
(now where have I heard that one recently? Oh, and don't forget Captain H. said just being investigated was a resigning issue!! He's being investigated! )
-
- Posts: 3193
- Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2019 8:25 am
- Location: Newport
It doesnt look good after the Labour leader cancelled the meeting on Monday with the Institute for Government with several journalists attending. Wonder if he will attend PMQ's this week or leave it to the Sharon Stone wannabe ?
If you've got a clip of that please post the link.firlandsfarm wrote: ↑Mon May 09, 2022 7:08 am... sounds like there's one rule for Captain Hindsight and Cruella and another rule for everyone else!Derek27 wrote: ↑Sun May 08, 2022 1:49 pmI never call somebody a liar unless it's clear cut. Denying any knowledge of a party you've been to or denying knowing you're at a party is lying, plain and simple. Labour back-stabbers are out and I've heard reports of people present saying they didn't go back to work after the curry and beer and there were people present who weren't working and just turned up to a social gathering but it's yet to be verified.
I'm getting sick of hearing the term 'beergate'. It's only an accusation and as such, doesn't fit the criteria to be called a 'gate'.
(now where have I heard that one recently? Oh, and don't forget Captain H. said just being investigated was a resigning issue!! He's being investigated! )
- firlandsfarm
- Posts: 2688
- Joined: Sat May 03, 2014 8:20 am
No clip but apparently on 31 January – he tweeted: "Honesty and decency matter. After months of denials the Prime Minister is now under criminal investigations for breaking his own lockdown laws. He needs to do the decent thing and resign." ... I don't do Twitter so cannot go further.Derek27 wrote: ↑Mon May 09, 2022 10:30 amIf you've got a clip of that please post the link.firlandsfarm wrote: ↑Mon May 09, 2022 7:08 am... sounds like there's one rule for Captain Hindsight and Cruella and another rule for everyone else!Derek27 wrote: ↑Sun May 08, 2022 1:49 pmI never call somebody a liar unless it's clear cut. Denying any knowledge of a party you've been to or denying knowing you're at a party is lying, plain and simple. Labour back-stabbers are out and I've heard reports of people present saying they didn't go back to work after the curry and beer and there were people present who weren't working and just turned up to a social gathering but it's yet to be verified.
I'm getting sick of hearing the term 'beergate'. It's only an accusation and as such, doesn't fit the criteria to be called a 'gate'.
(now where have I heard that one recently? Oh, and don't forget Captain H. said just being investigated was a resigning issue!! He's being investigated! )
My take on that is that he's not demanding the PM's resignation because he's under police investigation but because of months of denials and lying through his teeth in a manner an eight-year-old would think he could get away with.firlandsfarm wrote: ↑Mon May 09, 2022 11:42 amNo clip but apparently on 31 January – he tweeted: "Honesty and decency matter. After months of denials the Prime Minister is now under criminal investigations for breaking his own lockdown laws. He needs to do the decent thing and resign." ... I don't do Twitter so cannot go further.Derek27 wrote: ↑Mon May 09, 2022 10:30 amIf you've got a clip of that please post the link.firlandsfarm wrote: ↑Mon May 09, 2022 7:08 am
... sounds like there's one rule for Captain Hindsight and Cruella and another rule for everyone else!
(now where have I heard that one recently? Oh, and don't forget Captain H. said just being investigated was a resigning issue!! He's being investigated! )
If I was Starmer, I'd make any resignation subject to the result of an appeal. It's quite daft allowing a police officer to decide your fate and the guy's a barrister so he should know if he's got a case. BJ was probably advised that he's near-certain to lose any appeal.
-
- Posts: 3193
- Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2019 8:25 am
- Location: Newport
An appeal would mean a court case and if found guilty would result in a criminal conviction on his record. Just accepting the fine means nothing is on your record.Derek27 wrote: ↑Mon May 09, 2022 3:33 pmIf I was Starmer, I'd make any resignation subject to the result of an appeal. It's quite daft allowing a police officer to decide your fate and the guy's a barrister so he should know if he's got a case. BJ was probably advised that he's near-certain to lose any appeal.
Seriously, who cares about some people having a get together to discuss pretty important stuff when the blag pandemic was raging in the media. There are more important things to discuss than if somebody broke some stupid rule. Like is Putin going to nuke us or not and why has my energy bill gone up by £200 per month. Who gives a shit about Party's.
There's no harm in keeping his options open. I don't know the exact procedure but generally, government departments that make decisions against you have to give reasons for their decision. It's the reasons that you appeal rather than the decision. Simply agreeing to resign if a civil servant wants you to go opens the door for an FPN with grossly inadequate reasons.Archery1969 wrote: ↑Mon May 09, 2022 3:41 pmAn appeal would mean a court case and if found guilty would result in a criminal conviction on his record. Just accepting the fine means nothing is on your record.Derek27 wrote: ↑Mon May 09, 2022 3:33 pmIf I was Starmer, I'd make any resignation subject to the result of an appeal. It's quite daft allowing a police officer to decide your fate and the guy's a barrister so he should know if he's got a case. BJ was probably advised that he's near-certain to lose any appeal.