Dive for me and was looking for it if penalty's are given for that they'll be 4 or 5 a game.greenmark wrote: ↑Sat Aug 19, 2023 4:08 pmBeing all of odd, delusional and a Liverpool fan I look forward to the highlights later. Most seem to think it was simulation. Some think there was minimal contact that Szoboszlai exagerrated. Have we bought a diver? I seriously hope not.Michael5482 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 19, 2023 3:47 pmBig clubs get big decisions only the referee and VAR thought that was a penalty along with the odd delusional Liverpool fan. You either have VAR and use it or don't have it at all. Load of nonsense this "clear and obvious error" rule. Should of been reviewed and overturned no question about it.jamesedwards wrote: ↑Sat Aug 19, 2023 3:38 pm
Weird that VAR didn't get the ref to check the dive for the pen ???
But the VAR questions still buzz around. We've all now seen the tech they have (and it ain't cheap). The missing element is a verbal from the ref, like in rugby. I appreciate the refs are thinking "no chance, I'll be lynched".
But the girls have done it. Why can't big rufty tufty blokes?
But most of all we're now several years into VAR and there is still controversy. Football hierachy all over isn't it?
The missing element is consistency. VAR needs using for every penalty decision that's a good place to start.
Another one here as I type Macalister just been sent off ridiculous decision. He's gone for the ball and caught him yellow at best no malice in that tackle. No VAR review that was clear and obvious error.
