Lol, too much "kicking off" to keep track ofjamesedwards wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2024 4:31 pmRotherham was 8 pages of "kicking off" back. Please keep up with the kicking offs.![]()

Lol, too much "kicking off" to keep track ofjamesedwards wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2024 4:31 pmRotherham was 8 pages of "kicking off" back. Please keep up with the kicking offs.![]()
You know you have made it when people picnic on your land and take photos of your motor.Euler wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2024 3:53 pmTrue story. I had no idea migrants were being housed at a hotel near me until I came home one day and found them and their families having a picnic in my garden and posing next to my car. I went to the hotel to found out who was in charge to ask them to them to tell them to respect the local neighbourhood.
The hotel had set up a GP surgery just for them and a bus service to take them in and out of town when they wished.
I can see why people get upset.
Calling the Army in would be a last resort as it would indicate the Police can’t cope with civil disobedience. No government wants to admit that and I doubt the Police would either.
The police can't cope. They're on the retreat, unable to protect the hotel and rioters have got in. They even tried to set it on fire with people in the building.Archery1969 wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2024 7:31 pmCalling the Army in would be a last resort as it would indicate the Police can’t cope with civil disobedience. No government wants to admit that and I doubt the Police would either.
Also, 1/3 of UK troops are overseas at all times, another 1/3 are held back in reserve if the unthinkable happens. That leaves around 26,000 available minus those on leave or sick. That doesn’t leave many to deploy around the country in all the hotspots plus others that might pop up etc.