whilst you (assert) that labour have no intentions of dealing with ILLEGAL immigration ever (one for another day), they do make mention of their legal obligations and intentions in the manifesto: https://labour.org.uk/updates/stories/l ... all-boats/ForFolksSake wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 5:08 pmNot really - 5 weeks or 5 years it doesn't mattergreenmark wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 3:05 pmBlaming a 5 week old Labour Govt is staggeringly stupid.ForFolksSake wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 2:52 pm
and longer...
'What goes around comes around' is what we are seeing now
Labour have no intentions of dealing with illegal immigration ever , that's pretty obvious so far.
And I can't see Conservatives getting back into power before Sadiq Khan becomes next Prime Minister - game over
The Situation Room
- ForFolksSake
- Posts: 868
- Joined: Sat May 11, 2024 2:51 pm
I've read it - it's a fairy storyjimibt wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 5:15 pmwhilst you (assert) that labour have no intentions of dealing with ILLEGAL immigration ever (one for another day), they do make mention of their legal obligations and intentions in the manifesto: https://labour.org.uk/updates/stories/l ... all-boats/ForFolksSake wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 5:08 pmNot really - 5 weeks or 5 years it doesn't matter
Labour have no intentions of dealing with illegal immigration ever , that's pretty obvious so far.
And I can't see Conservatives getting back into power before Sadiq Khan becomes next Prime Minister - game over
And they all lived happily together ever after is how they would like it all to end
Last edited by ForFolksSake on Mon Aug 05, 2024 5:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 4478
- Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2019 8:25 am
To use a favourite phrase by the new Home Secretary.ForFolksSake wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 5:08 pmNot really - 5 weeks or 5 years it doesn't mattergreenmark wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 3:05 pmBlaming a 5 week old Labour Govt is staggeringly stupid.ForFolksSake wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 2:52 pm
and longer...
'What goes around comes around' is what we are seeing now
Labour have no intentions of dealing with illegal immigration ever , that's pretty obvious so far.
And I can't see Conservatives getting back into power before Sadiq Khan becomes next Prime Minister - game over
"There will be a reckoning"
I am sure there will be if Politicians ignore migration. The conversation is going on in Italy, Spain and Germany. The latter, since the Berlin wall fell has probably been the most open and inclusive country in the world. But they are too now having issues.
If you remember back to before Brexit. Most politicians ignored what at least 50% of the public was saying. Then it was too late to educate or change their views with simple, straightforward arguments.
The same thing will happen over migration. It will be ignored, your all racists and the overwelming majority are inclusive and division does not represent the United Kingdom.
Then, before you know it, something very bad will happen, Politicians will once again be behind the curve and need to take drastic action without thinking it through properly.
Maybe at somepoint there will be another national vote offered, although I am not sure how you would word the questions.
Lets see what happens in Plymouth tonight and Newcastle at the weekend to see if the policing is truly equal. If its not then things could turn to shit very quckly in the coming weeks, months and years.
what parts in particular did you find (from your own analysis) was falling short on tackling the issues in a way that complied with UN laws and civil liberties?? how would you propose we strike a balance which ensured that we had a viable workforce across all our key sectors but at the same time maintained the ease of mobility that we as UK citizens are afforded when working abroad.ForFolksSake wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 5:19 pmI've read it - it's a fairy storyjimibt wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 5:15 pmwhilst you (assert) that labour have no intentions of dealing with ILLEGAL immigration ever (one for another day), they do make mention of their legal obligations and intentions in the manifesto: https://labour.org.uk/updates/stories/l ... all-boats/ForFolksSake wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 5:08 pm
Not really - 5 weeks or 5 years it doesn't matter
Labour have no intentions of dealing with illegal immigration ever , that's pretty obvious so far.
And I can't see Conservatives getting back into power before Sadiq Khan becomes next Prime Minister - game over
i know you won't be able to answer this in a single sentence, but would be keen to see how your thinking balances these complex and competing forces.
Its all kicking of in Bangladesh
Crowds storm Bangladesh prime minister's residence | AFP
Not really sure what's going on but they seem to be having a good time.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wqK7vVYXYxo
Guy eating the presidents lunch for the gram.
Crowds storm Bangladesh prime minister's residence | AFP
Not really sure what's going on but they seem to be having a good time.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wqK7vVYXYxo
Guy eating the presidents lunch for the gram.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
and god forbid that ANYONE should find happiness - no matter who. jeez, we'd all be hugging trees and talking about best ways to cook broccoli!ForFolksSake wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 5:19 pmI've read it - it's a fairy storyjimibt wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 5:15 pmwhilst you (assert) that labour have no intentions of dealing with ILLEGAL immigration ever (one for another day), they do make mention of their legal obligations and intentions in the manifesto: https://labour.org.uk/updates/stories/l ... all-boats/ForFolksSake wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 5:08 pm
Not really - 5 weeks or 5 years it doesn't matter
Labour have no intentions of dealing with illegal immigration ever , that's pretty obvious so far.
And I can't see Conservatives getting back into power before Sadiq Khan becomes next Prime Minister - game over
And they all lived happily together ever after is how they would like it all to end
- ForFolksSake
- Posts: 868
- Joined: Sat May 11, 2024 2:51 pm
jimibt wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 5:28 pmwhat parts in particular did you find (from your own analysis) was falling short on tackling the issues in a way that complied with UN laws and civil liberties?? how would you propose we strike a balance which ensured that we had a viable workforce across all our key sectors but at the same time maintained the ease of mobility that we as UK citizens are afforded when working abroad.ForFolksSake wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 5:19 pmI've read it - it's a fairy storyjimibt wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 5:15 pm
whilst you (assert) that labour have no intentions of dealing with ILLEGAL immigration ever (one for another day), they do make mention of their legal obligations and intentions in the manifesto: https://labour.org.uk/updates/stories/l ... all-boats/
i know you won't be able to answer this in a single sentence, but would be keen to see how your thinking balances these complex and competing forces.
Simple - stop illegal immigrationhow would you propose we strike a balance which ensured that we had a viable workforce across all our key sectors
I'm afraid that horse has already bolted - Brexit ended that to a large extentat the same time maintained the ease of mobility that we as UK citizens are afforded when working abroad.
but my point was about the labour manifesto outlining it's legal response and approach to immigration. if you think that answers that, then i apologise for not being clear.ForFolksSake wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 5:46 pmSimple - stop illegal immigrationhow would you propose we strike a balance which ensured that we had a viable workforce across all our key sectors
so here we do have a common appreciation for making rushed decisions in the heat of the moment.ForFolksSake wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 5:46 pmI'm afraid that horse has already bolted - Brexit ended that to a large extentat the same time maintained the ease of mobility that we as UK citizens are afforded when working abroad.
In the 2016 Brexit referendum, Scotland overwhelmingly voted to remain in the EU by 62% to 38%. If you’re interested in Brexit specifically, the UK as a whole voted to leave the EU by 51.9% to 48.1%.
Thats probably the most intelligent thing you have said.ForFolksSake wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 3:19 pmTakes one to know one !greenmark wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 3:14 pmYou are a king canute!ForFolksSake wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 3:13 pm
Have you been round to you local mosque recently for your dinner and a glass of water, just wondering ?
- ForFolksSake
- Posts: 868
- Joined: Sat May 11, 2024 2:51 pm
jimibt wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 5:52 pmbut my point was about the labour manifesto outlining it's legal response and approach to immigration. if you think that answers that, then i apologise for not being clear.ForFolksSake wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 5:46 pmSimple - stop illegal immigrationhow would you propose we strike a balance which ensured that we had a viable workforce across all our key sectors
so here we do have a common appreciation for making rushed decisions in the heat of the moment.ForFolksSake wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 5:46 pmI'm afraid that horse has already bolted - Brexit ended that to a large extentat the same time maintained the ease of mobility that we as UK citizens are afforded when working abroad.
In the 2016 Brexit referendum, Scotland overwhelmingly voted to remain in the EU by 62% to 38%. If you’re interested in Brexit specifically, the UK as a whole voted to leave the EU by 51.9% to 48.1%.
Maybe Labour will let you have another Indie Ref - what do you think ?In the 2016 Brexit referendum, Scotland overwhelmingly voted to remain in the EU by 62% to 38%. If you’re
historically, the SNP championed independence as a matter of national identity and sovereignty. however, in recent years, the messaging has shifted to emphasize practical benefits, such as economic prosperity and improved public services.ForFolksSake wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 6:09 pmjimibt wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 5:52 pmbut my point was about the labour manifesto outlining it's legal response and approach to immigration. if you think that answers that, then i apologise for not being clear.
so here we do have a common appreciation for making rushed decisions in the heat of the moment.ForFolksSake wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 5:46 pm
I'm afraid that horse has already bolted - Brexit ended that to a large extent
In the 2016 Brexit referendum, Scotland overwhelmingly voted to remain in the EU by 62% to 38%. If you’re interested in Brexit specifically, the UK as a whole voted to leave the EU by 51.9% to 48.1%.Maybe Labour will let you have another Indie Ref - what do you think ?In the 2016 Brexit referendum, Scotland overwhelmingly voted to remain in the EU by 62% to 38%. If you’re
I personally appreciate the SNP’s governance and policies but would not prioritize independence (or any form of nationalism), therefore, the dichotomy of my SNP vote is for its track record on issues like healthcare, education, and social welfare and not indie ref.
-
- Posts: 4478
- Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2019 8:25 am
I been invited to an Indian tomorrow by one of the chefs for a free evening meal.
https://dhabaonthefalls.ca/
He is a very keen on Archery, the sport, not me. We both joined the same club over here.
I will do my best not to discuss migration or turn up in my St. Georges shorts and socks.
In effect we both migrants. But don’t tell the locals.

https://dhabaonthefalls.ca/
He is a very keen on Archery, the sport, not me. We both joined the same club over here.
I will do my best not to discuss migration or turn up in my St. Georges shorts and socks.
In effect we both migrants. But don’t tell the locals.
Archery, we've known each other for over 5 years (maybe more on initial forum handle!!) i know you knowArchery1969 wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 6:39 pmI been invited to an Indian tomorrow by one of the chefs for a free evening meal.
https://dhabaonthefalls.ca/
He is a very keen on Archery, the sport, not me. We both joined the same club over here.
I will do my best not to discuss migration or turn up in my St. Georges shorts and socks.
In effect we both migrants. But don’t tell the locals.
![]()


Last edited by jimibt on Mon Aug 05, 2024 6:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- ForFolksSake
- Posts: 868
- Joined: Sat May 11, 2024 2:51 pm
Archery1969 wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 6:39 pmI been invited to an Indian tomorrow by one of the chefs for a free evening meal.
https://dhabaonthefalls.ca/
He is a very keen on Archery, the sport, not me. We both joined the same club over here.
I will do my best not to discuss migration or turn up in my St. Georges shorts and socks.
In effect we both migrants. But don’t tell the locals.
![]()
But you/they wouldn't mind anyway if we did tell them because you are both 'legal' migrantsBut don’t tell the locals.
and have been issued with government-issued ID cards
Last edited by ForFolksSake on Mon Aug 05, 2024 6:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.