0-1, hedged up, job done, dinero fácil

On the match odds I'm seeing £0.3m on England and £1.7m on Spain.ShaunWhite wrote: ↑Sun Jul 27, 2025 6:02 pmAs usual all the partisan England money made the opposition great value.
0-1, hedged up, job done, dinero fácil![]()
To make it worse, it's the half time 2.5g market too.
Could have sworn is was half time 2.5g when I looked earlier, but now seems to be full time 2.5g. Perhaps I am going senile in my old age.
There has been speculation that syndicate accounts conveniently lose to private accounts every now and then, which don’t have to pay corporate tax. In many sports, you sometimes see £300,000 in turnover when the normal would be around £3,000. This has gone on for so long that it’s probably not a case of criminal money laundering as such. Or the mates just like generating massive turnover between themselves on some market, which then pops up on the front page — without either of them actually having any real risk on the outcome.jamesedwards wrote: ↑Sat Aug 02, 2025 9:03 amTo make it worse, it's the half time 2.5g market too.
Nobody seems to be trying to offload any of it. And now with the new graphs you can see it all went through at the same time, 07:23:28 so looks like all one trade. Perhaps it's a deliberate movement of money?
The little I have followed what Chelsea have been up to, they seem to be basing their whole PSR-avoidance plan on extremely long term player contracts and amortisation. It might seem smart now, but surely this is going to come back to bite them in the arse in 5+ years time when they're still covering the cost of players they're buying now? Probably I'm being too simplistic.Kai wrote: ↑Thu Aug 07, 2025 4:17 pm
But I still find Chelsea's scattergun recruitment a bit annoying, they just seem to be hoarding every young player with potential they can get their hands on, there still doesn't seem much planning on how they fit into the actual squad or the system. Almost feels like FOMO buying because they've missed out on so many generational talents in recent years. There was obviously Salah, then Kevin de Bruyne, they also released Declan Rice, plus Musiala, and probably more... Meanwhile, offloading homegrown players that cost £0 to produce but count as 100% profit on the books. It might be smart business but its annoying![]()
Yeah, I'm no financial expert either but they've been abusing amortisation to stockpile high potential players. Until UEFA closed their little loophole, so clubs can no longer spread a transfer fee across more than five years of a player's contract. The other key factor is Abramovich writing off the 1.5b debt that the club owed him, that gave them a healthy platform to just keep spending.jamesedwards wrote: ↑Thu Aug 07, 2025 5:31 pmThe little I have followed what Chelsea have been up to, they seem to be basing their whole PSR-avoidance plan on extremely long term player contracts and amortisation. It might seem smart now, but surely this is going to come back to bite them in the arse in 5+ years time when they're still covering the cost of players they're buying now? Probably I'm being too simplistic.Kai wrote: ↑Thu Aug 07, 2025 4:17 pm
But I still find Chelsea's scattergun recruitment a bit annoying, they just seem to be hoarding every young player with potential they can get their hands on, there still doesn't seem much planning on how they fit into the actual squad or the system. Almost feels like FOMO buying because they've missed out on so many generational talents in recent years. There was obviously Salah, then Kevin de Bruyne, they also released Declan Rice, plus Musiala, and probably more... Meanwhile, offloading homegrown players that cost £0 to produce but count as 100% profit on the books. It might be smart business but its annoying![]()