Building First Tennis Bot - Lay First Set Winner - Help/Advice?

[Dallas]

Yes I think I followed the instructions correctly. See screenshot below

TennisFixedscore2.jpg

I've ticked that box for the log.

Here is the BOT If you want to see if I've done anything wrong.

That looks fine to me, but I's still recommend ticking the 'Write the contents to the Bet Angel log', box at the bottom of the Stored value tab while testing

One other condition to add to your back bet2 rule which I forgot about to ensure the 60% of the split is placed on the 2nd set winner is to add a 'Tennis Completed Set' Condition to test the selection won the previous set

[kikiwillmo88]

Thanks for this and all your help. Had it running between practise and real mode and almost working perfectly.

I think Ive done the condition correctly. However am I right in thinking this won't trigger if there is a tie break in the second? There was no option on the drop down for '1 game or more or tie break'. How would this be solved?



Thanks

[kikiwillmo88]

One other condition to add to your back bet2 rule which I forgot about to ensure the 60% of the split is placed on the 2nd set winner is to add a 'Tennis Completed Set' Condition to test the selection won the previous set

Seems to still be struggling to skew the profits 60/40 if you see the below? Seems to be hedging still...

[Dallas]

Thanks for this and all your help. Had it running between practise and real mode and almost working perfectly.

I think Ive done the condition correctly. However am I right in thinking this won't trigger if there is a tie break in the second? There was no option on the drop down for '1 game or more or tie break'. How would this be solved?



Thanks

The tie break won't matter, as the player would have still won the set by one or more games ie, 7-6 or 6-7

[Dallas]

Thanks for this and all your help. Had it running between practise and real mode and almost working perfectly.

I think Ive done the condition correctly. However am I right in thinking this won't trigger if there is a tie break in the second? There was no option on the drop down for '1 game or more or tie break'. How would this be solved?



Thanks

So a few more edits to make

1) On your 'Close if Win Set' set rule
Go onto the Signal tab and set a signal on the market with a name of your choice (ie, delay), the value can be left as 1

2) Then on your 'Set/Modify Stored Value rule
Add a 'Signal Changed condition to test the signal named 'Delay' (or whatever you called it changed between 20 secs and 30secs ago

*That will ensure your green up rule has a chance to trigger and be matched at least twice and before the P/L is stored*

3) Also on that same 'Set/Modify Stored Value rule
Go onto the Stored Value tab and change the following
for Nominated Selection
to
For Current Selection

*I don't think this should matter but setting it as above would be better*

Then give that ago

[kikiwillmo88]

Thanks for this.

Think I have followed correctly below. Testing it now.

Screenshot 2025-08-19 at 12.30.16.png

Set&Modify.png

Screenshot 2025-08-19 at 12.30.41.png

[kikiwillmo88]

Following those changes it seems to have caused an issue where the lay is placed on the set one winner and the back of 100 is placed on the loser at the same time? See attached.

Doublebet.png

Also the log

Screenshot 2025-08-19 at 13.08.46.png

It then closed both out for the 30 loss during set 2. However the 100 back bet is designed to come into play if the lay odds are higher then 1.55 on the set 1 winner. Which they weren't. Think I must have done something wrong in the changes above.

[kikiwillmo88]

There seems to have been no repeat of the back and lay placement.

However with the amendments it is still struggling to do any kind of 60/40 skewing...

Noskew.png

[Dallas]

Following those changes it seems to have caused an issue where the lay is placed on the set one winner and the back of 100 is placed on the loser at the same time? See attached.

Doublebet.png


Also the log

Screenshot 2025-08-19 at 13.08.46.png

It then closed both out for the 30 loss during set 2. However the 100 back bet is designed to come into play if the lay odds are higher then 1.55 on the set 1 winner. Which they weren't. Think I must have done something wrong in the changes above.

Those bets are caused your original back and lay bets, none of the rules added or edited since the start of this thread
I assumed you had those triggering correctly already

[Dallas]

There seems to have been no repeat of the back and lay placement.

However with the amendments it is still struggling to do any kind of 60/40 skewing...

Noskew.png

Can you post a screenshot of the log? the first thing we need to know is that the SV rule triggered at the right time to capture the greened up profit and what stake it calculated from it
Also the Automation tab below the bottom window as that will provide the times the rules last triggered and by comparing them to the log the problem should be easy to spot

[kikiwillmo88]

The Back & Lay triggering was the first time that ever happened. Had been fine on about 50 markets and hasn't happened on 4 other markets today. So I'm not sure why it happened. Possibly a glitch? It closed out the bets when the drawdown was hit any way.

Here is the log (IGNORE THE 10 back on Stefanos, I created a separate bot that placed this on set 2 winner until we sorted the 60/40 skew).

Log.png

Here is the automation tab -

Automation Tab.png