HI,
When I back a horse, I also like to place an in-play bet at odds of 30 for £1, just as a little juicer, which has worked quite well. But this value was picked arbitrarily. Does anyone have an in-play database to see what an average winning horse might trade to in running?!
I would love to fine-tune this second bet, but I don't have the data to investigate....
In-play data for extra bet
The Betfair SP data includes the in-running hi/lo traded prices
https://promo.betfair.com/betfairsp/prices
https://promo.betfair.com/betfairsp/prices
Ah maybe I can figure something out, I can get all the winning horses from this data, but some of it seems confusing, how can the IPMAX be much lower than the BSP on some runners...? some there starting at >4 and only have an ipmax of 1.3 something......?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- jamesedwards
- Posts: 4594
- Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2018 6:16 pm
I've downloaded so many now, over 3 months' worth and they are all like!
Whats the point in publishing data that is so faulty? unless i'm not understanding something....?
Whats the point in publishing data that is so faulty? unless i'm not understanding something....?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- jamesedwards
- Posts: 4594
- Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2018 6:16 pm
Frustrating, but there's only 25 races in there that look anomalous, and out of 3 months of racing that's not a bad error rate.
You could easily enough exclude them from your data by removing races where the IPMAX is significantly lower than PPMIN.
You could easily enough exclude them from your data by removing races where the IPMAX is significantly lower than PPMIN.
Looking at betfair's data definition, IPMAX requires a bet with a minimum of £100 payout before it is included in the data set.
That doesn't explain all the data anomalies, but could explain the ones where the IPMAX is only slightly below the BSP.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.