Which strategy is better

T20, IPL, Test matches or the Ashes, discuss it here.
Post Reply
User avatar
azfyazfy
Posts: 79
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2018 5:12 pm

Back first lay second or lay first back second
Gives your honest reply
User avatar
Euler
Posts: 27157
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 1:39 pm

It's entirely market timing and odds dependent, there is no strategy one better than the other. It's completely dependent upon the market state.
User avatar
ForFolksSake
Posts: 1097
Joined: Sat May 11, 2024 2:51 pm

You could also have a strategy that 'Backs' and 'Lays' at the same time... 🤔💡
Last edited by ForFolksSake on Fri May 01, 2026 11:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Kai
Posts: 7339
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2015 12:21 pm

A straight back or lay strategy can work too

But you would probably need the WHY behind the backs and lays to call them a strategy
User avatar
ShaunWhite
Posts: 10736
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 3:42 am

azfyazfy wrote:
Fri May 01, 2026 2:56 pm
Back first lay second or lay first back second
Gives your honest reply
If the price is drifting then lay first, if it's shortening then back first.

But one consideration might be trading for a few ticks around the step changes. Eg where a profitable back earns you 0.01 per tick when it shortens but loses 0.02 per tick if it drifts. (ie if you backed at 2.0). That said odds are just probability so a move from 50% to 48% or 52% are equally likely so you'd get more ticks one side than the other but the same payout.

The only other one I can think of is greening an existing free bet situation in a drifting market, the hedging lay will be at a bigger and bigger price and the hedged amount will get smaller as it drifts. But all situations have an opposite so without typing all that again for the reverse, just bear it in mind.
User avatar
azfyazfy
Posts: 79
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2018 5:12 pm

Thanks for your replies guys
But what I need is probability distributions.
For example on Tennis match 10000 trials on favourite which strategy is better.
Back first or lay second or lay first or back second.
User avatar
Euler
Posts: 27157
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 1:39 pm

The far too simplistic approach. If you look at every single tennis match, you'll end up more or less exactly at break-even, If you're just backing or laying.
tico
Posts: 188
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2024 9:18 pm

Hi,
Back or lay doesn't matter ,it's your ability to anticipate if the price is going one way or another.This is the essence of trading.Take a scenario where we have a weak favourite at 2/1(Industry SP) then all of a sudden the price shifts to 5/2 ,the likelyhood of the second favourite coming in with BF is going to increase so you act accordingly despite what money is available at higher prices.This example is just one of many and the secret is trying to second guess the direction .Sometimes you haven't a snowballs hope in hell of anticipating the direction of a move and othertimes it stands out .
That's about the only advice I can give (as a recent convert to trading) but there are lot's of other pointers,if you immerse yourself in Peter's vids there are lots of nuggets of wisdom .But ultimately it will be instinct that gets you there.
Kinders
Tico
User avatar
megarain
Posts: 2187
Joined: Thu May 16, 2013 1:26 pm
Contact:

Modern markets are very much about momentum and match-ups.

if a batter is historically good/bad against a certain type of bowling, the market may well adjust as a new bowler comes on etc.

There are a myriad of factors.
Post Reply

Return to “Betfair Cricket trading”