100% the same - I'll always be there; the question is whether you want me thereSweetLyrics wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 6:37 pmLook mate, you do whatever you want to, and I wish you well. Genuinely.

100% the same - I'll always be there; the question is whether you want me thereSweetLyrics wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 6:37 pmLook mate, you do whatever you want to, and I wish you well. Genuinely.
ruthlessimon wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 7:18 pm100% the same - I'll always be there; the question is whether you want me thereSweetLyrics wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 6:37 pmLook mate, you do whatever you want to, and I wish you well. Genuinely.![]()
You can exit at bsp using Guardian. It won't be spot on but even my system isn't because bsp can't be known to a high precision. But over the course of enough races the imbalances even out. You could also do it via Excel and some beginner's VBA.ruthlessimon wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 6:21 pmLet’s assume we discover an edge that works exiting @ bsp – how are you gonna execute it? Only 1 person in the world I know who can do that, & it’s bloody messy; bloody complicated!
If I could exit @ Bsp, my profitability is boosted by like 5%/10% - although I’d need to reanalyze that – but I’m pretty sure it’ll give me a boost.
SweetLyrics wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 7:36 pmJust in case anyone is wondering, Simon and I aren't in any kind of non-platonic relationship!![]()
ruthlessimon wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 7:47 pmSweetLyrics wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 7:36 pmJust in case anyone is wondering, Simon and I aren't in any kind of non-platonic relationship!![]()
![]()
But srsly mate, you overstepped the mark. My offer still holds, & it speaks volumes you aren't taking it. Not many turn down a risk free shot at £1000. If that's called heat, at least it's potentially very profitable heat![]()
If certain parts of the system are invalid, I agree void.SweetLyrics wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 7:55 pmAs for the bet, even if Peter says that the system is a non-starter, you can say that he didn't give a good enough explanation, so have a get out, so it's not a proper bet.
Fine, make it 50/50 then - £100 each if it makes you feel betterSweetLyrics wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 7:55 pmPlus, if an eccentric wants to give me a grand of their money if a particular event happens, at zero risk to me, I'm not sure I'd feel comfortable accepting. It doesn't strike me as a particularly ethical thing to do; I'd feel like I was taking advantage of their foolishness (and yes, I know that's basically what profitable traders do in the marketplace, but still)...
No jealous, relieved not to be involved.spreadbetting wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 8:11 pmYou two should get a room, you'll be getting Shaun jealous.
Bringing me back to realityShaunWhite wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 9:48 pmI guess you saw my explanation about how to close at bsp?
If you can see 5 or 10% between your close and bsp, you should trade that seperately,ideally automated. A bot doesn't mind waiting all day for a few opportunities.
How did you arrive at that figure?ruthlessimon wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 6:21 pmBut to be professional pre-off swinger, min stakes need to be £5 a tick (at least) if we’re trading a very rigid strategy.
I thought it was a shiny nugget in the mire actually. Those are worth picking up.ruthlessimon wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 9:50 pmBringing me back to realityShaunWhite wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 9:48 pmI guess you saw my explanation about how to close at bsp?
If you can see 5 or 10% between your close and bsp, you should trade that seperately,ideally automated. A bot doesn't mind waiting all day for a few opportunities.![]()
I did see it in the mire, but yeah I'll a good look at it later, really appreciated
I wondered that too, but I decided not to pursue it. In the words of Basil Fawlty: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s6EaoPMANQM&t=0m58sShaunWhite wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 9:52 pmHow did you arrive at that figure?ruthlessimon wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 6:21 pmBut to be professional pre-off swinger, min stakes need to be £5 a tick (at least) if we’re trading a very rigid strategy.