Excuses, Excuses, Excuses
- firlandsfarm
- Posts: 3330
- Joined: Sat May 03, 2014 8:20 am
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... itain.html ... imagine the uproar from the hypocritical Luvvies and other anti-Conservatives if a Conservative Chancellor (or other Minister/MP) had falsified their CV as she has clearly done. Are we happy to have a deceitful liar as Chancellor representing us around the financial world?
-
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2015 9:38 am
Defo not limited to the Conservatives but seems a remarkably high incidence of falsifying CV's amongst politicians. I can't see why it shouldn't be a breach of the ministerial code and being sacked an option.firlandsfarm wrote: ↑Fri Jan 31, 2025 6:56 amhttps://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... itain.html ... imagine the uproar from the hypocritical Luvvies and other anti-Conservatives if a Conservative Chancellor (or other Minister/MP) had falsified their CV as she has clearly done. Are we happy to have a deceitful liar as Chancellor representing us around the financial world?
We had a local candidate (SNP) with a CV of:
- went to uni studying law / business
- small business owner
- went on a world tour meeting other small business owners etc
Actual CV should have read
- dropped out of uni in 1st year
- worked as a waitress in Mums cafe
- took a gap year on Mums expense travelling the world partying....
- firlandsfarm
- Posts: 3330
- Joined: Sat May 03, 2014 8:20 am
I asked Google "are errors in a CV criminal?" and it responded "Yes, depending on the severity and intent, significant errors or deliberate lies on a CV can be considered a criminal offense, classified as "fraud by false representation" under the Fraud Act 2006, meaning that intentionally misleading information on a CV could lead to legal repercussions, including potential criminal charges." So is it reasonable to assume she made so many 'innocent mistakes' and if she did would her lack of attention to detail preclude her from being Chancellor!sionascaig wrote: ↑Fri Jan 31, 2025 8:06 amDefo not limited to the Conservatives but seems a remarkably high incidence of falsifying CV's amongst politicians. I can't see why it shouldn't be a breach of the ministerial code and being sacked an option.firlandsfarm wrote: ↑Fri Jan 31, 2025 6:56 amhttps://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... itain.html ... imagine the uproar from the hypocritical Luvvies and other anti-Conservatives if a Conservative Chancellor (or other Minister/MP) had falsified their CV as she has clearly done. Are we happy to have a deceitful liar as Chancellor representing us around the financial world?
We had a local candidate (SNP) with a CV of:
- went to uni studying law / business
- small business owner
- went on a world tour meeting other small business owners etc
Actual CV should have read
- dropped out of uni in 1st year
- worked as a waitress in Mums cafe
- took a gap year on Mums expense travelling the world partying....
-
- Posts: 1693
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2022 8:11 pm
I'd have a guess and say he was an atheist but he had a particular issue with Isalm including why it's an issue with free speech (see Charlie Hebdo)sionascaig wrote: ↑Thu Jan 30, 2025 7:17 pmHe wasn't particularly keen on Christians either....Michael5482 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 30, 2025 4:02 pm
A shame Christopher Hitchens is no longer with us, he had Islam's number 20 years ago. People are waking up to what it is and why it's dangerous, it has no place in Western society.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u6cpNhMx_AE
“With or without religion, good people can behave well and bad people can do evil; but for good people to do evil - that takes religion.”
― Steven Weinberg
Anyway here he is destroying a Rabbi to pieces https://youtu.be/Xx_ov2NiNo4?t=204
-
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2015 9:38 am
She (particularly as a politician), if found out has misled on a CV, shouldfirlandsfarm wrote: ↑Fri Jan 31, 2025 8:15 am
I asked Google "are errors in a CV criminal?" and it responded "Yes, depending on the severity and intent, significant errors or deliberate lies on a CV can be considered a criminal offense, classified as "fraud by false representation" under the Fraud Act 2006, meaning that intentionally misleading information on a CV could lead to legal repercussions, including potential criminal charges." So is it reasonable to assume she made so many 'innocent mistakes' and if she did would her lack of attention to detail preclude her from being Chancellor!
1. Go back to the electorate that put her in Westminster and explain situation
2. If a minister, be subject to an ethics enquiry as for all we know the CV was at least partially relied on for the promotion into government.
What a can of worms that would open up !
I see no reason if her constituents are not happy with explanation in 1) then should be subject to a recall petition. And sacked under 2) pending outcome of enquiry.
-
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2015 9:38 am
Yeah, was just thinking about that one!Michael5482 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 31, 2025 8:23 am
I'd have a guess and say he was an atheist but he had a particular issue with Isalm including why it's an issue with free speech (see Charlie Hebdo)
Anyway here he is destroying a Rabbi to pieces https://youtu.be/Xx_ov2NiNo4?t=204
His debating abilities are off the scale & even if you disagree with his positions he at least makes you think & question own beliefs.
What a loss...
His brother Peter (Hitchens), also worth a look. Very compelling at presenting arguments (although he is not an atheist).
- firlandsfarm
- Posts: 3330
- Joined: Sat May 03, 2014 8:20 am
It's made me think that for parliamentary positions from MP upwards there should be a vetting of a person's CV.sionascaig wrote: ↑Fri Jan 31, 2025 8:31 amShe (particularly as a politician), if found out has misled on a CV, should
1. Go back to the electorate that put her in Westminster and explain situation
2. If a minister, be subject to an ethics enquiry as for all we know the CV was at least partially relied on for the promotion into government.
What a can of worms that would open up !
I see no reason if her constituents are not happy with explanation in 1) then should be subject to a recall petition. And sacked under 2) pending outcome of enquiry.
-
- Posts: 1693
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2022 8:11 pm
This is a non story most exaggerate on their CV's at a guess. Real issue is how simple it is to get elected basically get on the back of a political party win the most votes in a certain area and you're into Parliament or Cabinet if you're in with the leader no CV required. We even had 4 MP's elected on a pro-Palestine ticket that should be more concerting than a CV.firlandsfarm wrote: ↑Fri Jan 31, 2025 8:48 amIt's made me think that for parliamentary positions from MP upwards there should be a vetting of a person's CV.sionascaig wrote: ↑Fri Jan 31, 2025 8:31 amShe (particularly as a politician), if found out has misled on a CV, should
1. Go back to the electorate that put her in Westminster and explain situation
2. If a minister, be subject to an ethics enquiry as for all we know the CV was at least partially relied on for the promotion into government.
What a can of worms that would open up !
I see no reason if her constituents are not happy with explanation in 1) then should be subject to a recall petition. And sacked under 2) pending outcome of enquiry.
The other issue is Starmer get's rid of Reeve's Labour are devoid of business experience who are they going to replace her with? How can a political party have a front bench with next to no business experience and be allowed to be let loose with the country's economy it's absolutely mental.
It highlights why the country is where it is. For the past 20 years or so we've ended up with 3rd rate punks for MP's, don't get me wrong we've had a few good ones but they are few and far between.
-
- Posts: 1693
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2022 8:11 pm
I prefer Douglas Murray possibly because he does more Youtube and Podcasts but yes I'll watch Peter if he's on something but most of his work is tabloid and don't bother with news papers anymore tbhsionascaig wrote: ↑Fri Jan 31, 2025 8:36 amYeah, was just thinking about that one!Michael5482 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 31, 2025 8:23 am
I'd have a guess and say he was an atheist but he had a particular issue with Isalm including why it's an issue with free speech (see Charlie Hebdo)
Anyway here he is destroying a Rabbi to pieces https://youtu.be/Xx_ov2NiNo4?t=204
His debating abilities are off the scale & even if you disagree with his positions he at least makes you think & question own beliefs.
What a loss...
His brother Peter (Hitchens), also worth a look. Very compelling at presenting arguments (although he is not an atheist).
Stephen Fry, Douglas Murray, Richard Dawkins and Lawrence Krauss did a podcast on Christopher Hitchens life in December last year.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ogx7DdXIcIM
- ForFolksSake
- Posts: 871
- Joined: Sat May 11, 2024 2:51 pm
Surely that should apply to everyone's CV.firlandsfarm wrote: ↑Fri Jan 31, 2025 8:48 amIt's made me think that for parliamentary positions from MP upwards there should be a vetting of a person's CV.sionascaig wrote: ↑Fri Jan 31, 2025 8:31 amShe (particularly as a politician), if found out has misled on a CV, should
1. Go back to the electorate that put her in Westminster and explain situation
2. If a minister, be subject to an ethics enquiry as for all we know the CV was at least partially relied on for the promotion into government.
What a can of worms that would open up !
I see no reason if her constituents are not happy with explanation in 1) then should be subject to a recall petition. And sacked under 2) pending outcome of enquiry.
You should get a job based purely on ability rather than diversity no matter what the job
Donald Trump is a 100% correct in calling it out
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cpvmdm1m7m9o
- ForFolksSake
- Posts: 871
- Joined: Sat May 11, 2024 2:51 pm
This week Norway became a cautionary tale of what can happen to a Left-wing government that blindly pursues green energy policies and alienates its wealth generators, with its government collapsing after weeks of vicious infighting.
We can only hope
We can only hope
-
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2015 9:38 am
Norway Sovereign FundForFolksSake wrote: ↑Sat Feb 01, 2025 11:24 amThis week Norway became a cautionary tale of what can happen to a Left-wing government that blindly pursues green energy policies and alienates its wealth generators, with its government collapsing after weeks of vicious infighting.
We can only hope![]()
We can only hope...
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- ForFolksSake
- Posts: 871
- Joined: Sat May 11, 2024 2:51 pm
Good pointsionascaig wrote: ↑Sat Feb 01, 2025 11:28 amNorway Sovereign FundForFolksSake wrote: ↑Sat Feb 01, 2025 11:24 amThis week Norway became a cautionary tale of what can happen to a Left-wing government that blindly pursues green energy policies and alienates its wealth generators, with its government collapsing after weeks of vicious infighting.
We can only hope![]()
Screenshot 2025-02-01 112716.png
We can only hope...
-
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2015 9:38 am
Its interesting that their holding in "green" investments is almost zero though - maybe that is why returns been great )
- ForFolksSake
- Posts: 871
- Joined: Sat May 11, 2024 2:51 pm
Foreign direct investmentsionascaig wrote: ↑Sat Feb 01, 2025 11:40 amIts interesting that their holding in "green" investments is almost zero though - maybe that is why returns been great )
In 2023, Norway invested £7 billion in the UK, while the UK invested £6.1 billion in Norway
Norway's sovereign wealth fund, Norges Bank Investment Management, has invested in the UK
Renewable energy projects
Statkraft, a Norwegian company, has invested £1.4 billion in renewable energy infrastructure in the UK
In June 2024, Norges Bank Investment Management bought a 37.5% stake in Race Bank, an offshore wind farm in Britain
Grid stability schemes
Statkraft has invested in grid stability schemes in the UK, including the Swansea Greener Grid Park
These schemes use low carbon technology to improve grid stability and reduce the need for fossil fuel power plants