I must admit, I had to look up a definition for "psychofant".........and I would like to assure you that I am not an ass-kisser, apple polisher, groveller, bootlicker, or any of the other associated words I came across..........I am just some one (with little BA knowledge) who was trying to help.mister man wrote: ↑Wed Dec 14, 2022 2:49 pmyes, checked that.
I think it would be helpful, if someone would, actually refer to the decriptions, which clearly show, all are to a row number...
"Clearly shows that".
re 60 seconds
no isolating each of 8 rules one by one, creating 8 new separate rules, is not 60 seconds at all.
yes looking at the info in the latest screenshots is 60seconds.
Trouble is, they show they are as required.
re - two gurus, they have had a cursory look, and said more info needed
more supplied, ignored,not reffered too.
yeah great, now lets get all the psychofants piling in.
ive made my feelings known to support, outside the forum.
I dont think this open forum is the best way to resolve.
You have stated in your last post that the screenshot you uploaded proves that everything is as it should be.............it does not, it does not show any of the conditions attached to the rules, if any of those conditions are applied to a selection by name (and not row number), you will get the error you have been getting.
I suggested earlier that you checked the conditions, and hinted that it would probably take you about 60 secs...............8 rules with 2 or 3 conditions each, gives you 2 or 3 seconds per condition to see if it is assigned by name or number.
In reply you started your last post (quoted above) with "yes, checked that" but then go on to say "re 60 seconds, no isolating each of 8 rules one by one, creating 8 new separate rules, is not 60 seconds at all."
Have you checked that the conditions for each rule are assigned to row number and not by name ?
.......only trying to help!
