New beta version of Bet Angel v1.55.0 - now on general release

[Bet Angel]

Little small bug with 1.55.0.b2 but no biggie.

If I navigate with guardian and have the matched bets tab open then it shows the bets that I have matched.

If I switch to the Odds tab, select a different market then click on matched bets (where I have a bet matched) then it shows no bets for that market.

Thanks - we'll look into that.

[sa7med]

I noticed that the ladder cells no longer highlight when you scroll over them, that was useful feedback imo. Helps making sure you're clicking on the right place, and your connection to VPS is okay.

[Bet Angel]

I noticed that the ladder cells no longer highlight when you scroll over them, that was useful feedback imo. Helps making sure you're clicking on the right place, and your connection to VPS is okay.

The cells are still supposed to be tracking the mouse, so looks like a bug.

[sa7med]

I noticed that the ladder cells no longer highlight when you scroll over them, that was useful feedback imo. Helps making sure you're clicking on the right place, and your connection to VPS is okay.

The cells are still supposed to be tracking the mouse, so looks like a bug.

Happening on at least two of my VPS

[Bet Angel]

You said you expected an influx of requests for SV's - I'd like to suggest two

1. Number of runners - required in so many calculations but currently has to be obtained first in a rule of its own instead of simply being refered to.
2. LTP as a percentage - why not complete the set for those of us that work in %ages.

They are good ideas and should be fairly easy to implement.

A SUM option for shared stored values - to aid calculations.

Could you give some examples of the sort of things you're looking to add up? Is it a case of totalling the same named SV but for every selection in the market, or are you looking to provide a list of different names of SV but all for the same selection? You can do SV_A = SV_B + SV_C at the moment, but I guess if you want to add five values together you'd currently need a chain of four of those commands.

A favoritism or rank by SV option - so we can pick the highest or lowest of a list of our shared SVs

Similar question - are you looking to rank a single named SV by extracting them from all selections in the market, or do you want to rank a list of different named SVs on the same selection? I can see this heading to a request for 'give me the selection' that ranks highest or second highest in this custom list of values, rather than just 'give me the highest ranked value' itself. That would add a whole new level of complexity.

If you (and others) can give some real world examples of the usage, we'll have a think about it.

[Jukebox]

You said you expected an influx of requests for SV's - I'd like to suggest two

1. Number of runners - required in so many calculations but currently has to be obtained first in a rule of its own instead of simply being refered to.
2. LTP as a percentage - why not complete the set for those of us that work in %ages.

They are good ideas and should be fairly easy to implement.

A SUM option for shared stored values - to aid calculations.

Could you give some examples of the sort of things you're looking to add up? Is it a case of totalling the same named SV but for every selection in the market, or are you looking to provide a list of different names of SV but all for the same selection? You can do SV_A = SV_B + SV_C at the moment, but I guess if you want to add five values together you'd currently need a chain of four of those commands.

A favoritism or rank by SV option - so we can pick the highest or lowest of a list of our shared SVs

Similar question - are you looking to rank a single named SV by extracting them from all selections in the market, or do you want to rank a list of different named SVs on the same selection? I can see this heading to a request for 'give me the selection' that ranks highest or second highest in this custom list of values, rather than just 'give me the highest ranked value' itself. That would add a whole new level of complexity.

If you (and others) can give some real world examples of the usage, we'll have a think about it.

Re SUM option - I meant only to have the SUM of the Shared stored values of the same name. This would for example allow us in turn to calculate separately what proportion of that total our individual SV is without the tortuous first step of adding the shared SV's in pairs and pairs of pairs etc to find the total. Although I can see any extra ability to at least add SVs other than in pairs would be helpful.

Re RANK or Favoritism by Shared SV
Again I meant only Shared SV of the same name - Imagine I have through various calculations achieved a shared SV to identify best back or lay value and wind up with a shared SV in a market that looks like this on each of the 6 runners: 1.52, 2.30, -4,30, 2.01, 0.01, -1.80 I can see that 2.30 is my HIGHEST and -4.30 is my LOWEST. I might want to pick one or other of them simply because it is the best in that market and not because it is over 2 or under -2

and thanks for the consideration.

[telboy5]

Hi, before I download this, will it work with Windows 7 professional, or do I have to change my gas powered computer ?

[Jukebox]

Hi, before I download this, will it work with Windows 7 professional, or do I have to change my gas powered computer ?

I'm using Windows 7 pro quite happily - I did have to get the update to Explorer a little while back when Betfair changed something.

[STARBUCK62]

I have just got in from work, downloaded 1.542 e as suggested by BetAngel login I have put HL Price Data into Guardian automation, apply rules to all markets and it will not add it tom them, I cannot use my VWAP settings on the ladders now, so much for grabbing a few races to trade on before the evening ends.

[STARBUCK62]

I was on the beta version 1.55, will that have made a difference, I was wondering though if it is why would BetAngel ask me to download the latest version.
I will be happy to download the Beta version again if that is the reason.

[Euler]

You need to download the latest beta version on this thread v1.55, you have switched back to the old version.

[STARBUCK62]

Thank you, I just assumed because the login screen ask me to download it it was the latest version after the beta, will do it now

[Jukebox]

Thank you, I just assumed because the login screen ask me to download it it was the latest version after the beta, will do it now

Thats for the chart fix for the 'non'beta' version

[STARBUCK62]

Capture1.PNG

Capture.PNG

Now it wont change to the beta version ...I was born to have things go difficult for me, I do not see though that this can be my doing lol

[Euler]

I can't work out what your query is there?