Today's Football

Football, Soccer - whatever you call it. It is the beautiful game.
Post Reply
User avatar
Archangel
Posts: 2008
Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2013 3:03 pm

Euler wrote:
Wed Aug 14, 2019 6:12 pm
Lampard first to be sacked this season?
My money is on Pelligrini
greenmark
Posts: 6266
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2018 2:15 pm

Kafkaesque wrote:
Wed Aug 14, 2019 6:26 pm
Euler wrote:
Wed Aug 14, 2019 6:12 pm
Lampard first to be sacked this season?
Unless they go into complete meltdown, by which I mean something along the lines of being closer to relegation than top 4, then I cannot see them sacking him at ANY stage this season.

Things being what they are, with the transfer ban and them already taking a bit of a punt in hiring him, I'd say they're okay with it being a transition season, for once, despite their usual trigger happy nature.
I agree. Who would go there with two windows closed? Pullis? That would rile the fans for sure. Roman's trigger-happy nature and the transfer ban has really compromised what Chelsea can achieve and what they can do to attract a top manager. So they're stuck. It's all on Lampard's shoulders.
User avatar
Archangel
Posts: 2008
Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2013 3:03 pm

Archangel wrote:
Wed Aug 14, 2019 5:44 pm
UEFA Super Cup

Chelsea 9/2, at a neutral venue , recency bias ?
I love recency bias in football
Profits taken
greenmark
Posts: 6266
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2018 2:15 pm

can't do anything on this. No BT Sport and can't find a dodgy stream. B**ger!!
User avatar
Kafkaesque
Posts: 886
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2017 10:20 am

greenmark wrote:
Wed Aug 14, 2019 7:59 pm
Kafkaesque wrote:
Wed Aug 14, 2019 6:26 pm
Euler wrote:
Wed Aug 14, 2019 6:12 pm
Lampard first to be sacked this season?
Unless they go into complete meltdown, by which I mean something along the lines of being closer to relegation than top 4, then I cannot see them sacking him at ANY stage this season.

Things being what they are, with the transfer ban and them already taking a bit of a punt in hiring him, I'd say they're okay with it being a transition season, for once, despite their usual trigger happy nature.
I agree. Who would go there with two windows closed? Pullis? That would rile the fans for sure. Roman's trigger-happy nature and the transfer ban has really compromised what Chelsea can achieve and what they can do to attract a top manager. So they're stuck. It's all on Lampard's shoulders.

Well, they're still have big pull, I'd say. A ton a hugely talented youth coming through and still a top 10 in the World in terms of economic strength, once the market is open to them again. And you'd suspect, they'd have serious spending power, with Hazard leaving for a big fee and no incomings for that money.

In the medium to long term, I still feel they can get a lot of the World's top manager, bar the very, very best.

In the short term, should things implode for Lampard, then Steve Holland would be the obvious one.
greenmark
Posts: 6266
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2018 2:15 pm

Kafkaesque wrote:
Wed Aug 14, 2019 8:56 pm
greenmark wrote:
Wed Aug 14, 2019 7:59 pm
Kafkaesque wrote:
Wed Aug 14, 2019 6:26 pm


Unless they go into complete meltdown, by which I mean something along the lines of being closer to relegation than top 4, then I cannot see them sacking him at ANY stage this season.

Things being what they are, with the transfer ban and them already taking a bit of a punt in hiring him, I'd say they're okay with it being a transition season, for once, despite their usual trigger happy nature.
I agree. Who would go there with two windows closed? Pullis? That would rile the fans for sure. Roman's trigger-happy nature and the transfer ban has really compromised what Chelsea can achieve and what they can do to attract a top manager. So they're stuck. It's all on Lampard's shoulders.

Well, they're still have big pull, I'd say. A ton a hugely talented youth coming through and still a top 10 in the World in terms of economic strength, once the market is open to them again. And you'd suspect, they'd have serious spending power, with Hazard leaving for a big fee and no incomings for that money.

In the medium to long term, I still feel they can get a lot of the World's top manager, bar the very, very best.

In the short term, should things implode for Lampard, then Steve Holland would be the obvious one.
But Roman has zero reputation of promoting from within. His MO is to buy success. But he currently cannot.
User avatar
Euler
Posts: 26369
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 1:39 pm

Xtra time. Liverpool play again on Saturday away at Saints.
User avatar
Archangel
Posts: 2008
Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2013 3:03 pm

Euler wrote:
Wed Aug 14, 2019 9:52 pm
Xtra time. Liverpool play again on Saturday away at Saints.
Saints currently 6/1 for that
User avatar
Euler
Posts: 26369
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 1:39 pm

That didn't look like a pen and VAR didn't correct the error.
User avatar
Archangel
Posts: 2008
Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2013 3:03 pm

Game should have gone straight to pens. Playing 90 mins + extra time at this stage of the season is mad
User avatar
Dublin_Flyer
Posts: 843
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 10:39 am

Abrahams penalty is 2nd only to Diana Ross's in the 1994 World Cup opening ceremony for shockingly bad. :lol:
User avatar
Kai
Posts: 7095
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2015 12:21 pm

Adrian becomes a Liverpool legend after 2 games, that's quite a career turnaround.
User avatar
Kafkaesque
Posts: 886
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2017 10:20 am

greenmark wrote:
Wed Aug 14, 2019 9:15 pm
Kafkaesque wrote:
Wed Aug 14, 2019 8:56 pm
greenmark wrote:
Wed Aug 14, 2019 7:59 pm

I agree. Who would go there with two windows closed? Pullis? That would rile the fans for sure. Roman's trigger-happy nature and the transfer ban has really compromised what Chelsea can achieve and what they can do to attract a top manager. So they're stuck. It's all on Lampard's shoulders.

Well, they're still have big pull, I'd say. A ton a hugely talented youth coming through and still a top 10 in the World in terms of economic strength, once the market is open to them again. And you'd suspect, they'd have serious spending power, with Hazard leaving for a big fee and no incomings for that money.

In the medium to long term, I still feel they can get a lot of the World's top manager, bar the very, very best.

In the short term, should things implode for Lampard, then Steve Holland would be the obvious one.
But Roman has zero reputation of promoting from within. His MO is to buy success. But he currently cannot.
Zero, really? Di Matteo ;)

An outlier among the many managers, Chelsea have had under his ownership, for sure. But likewise an outlier in terms of how things are done in England (at least since the EPL money started really pouring in). I'm struggling to even remember the last time an English side of any sort of decent size promoting within, Di Matteo aside! Martin Jol, maybe if you wanna count a few months at Spurs as from within. O'Leary like two decades ago is the only one otherwise, who springs to mind. Probably missing someone. By my count, he's got a huge reputation for promoting from within by EPL standards ;)

In any case, Holland isn't at Chelsea anymore, so wouldn't even be from within as such.
User avatar
Kai
Posts: 7095
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2015 12:21 pm

I agree that Frank shouldn't be under any real pressure this season, very different circumstances compared to previous managers. I feel Chelsea will be fine if they keep putting in performances like this despite having two very harsh results. Zouma was directly at fault for losing both games, he's an absolute trashbag.
User avatar
Archangel
Posts: 2008
Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2013 3:03 pm

It will be really interesting to see what happens with Lampard. As hes a Chelsea legend, and they have a transfer ban, would imagine he will be given time. But then the owner is quite unpredictable and if they are struggling mid season it might be different.

Bit worried about Pool also, they have put in some quite poor defensive performances the last 3 games. They looked rock solid in that area last season.
Post Reply

Return to “Football trading”