Are you aiming for a similiar profit per bet or similiar liability/risk per bet?On_The_Edge wrote: ↑Sat Jan 29, 2022 7:45 pmLargest stake used about £35, smallest £5. Average risk per trade around £15 or so.
If you're not you'll skew the P&L
Are you aiming for a similiar profit per bet or similiar liability/risk per bet?On_The_Edge wrote: ↑Sat Jan 29, 2022 7:45 pmLargest stake used about £35, smallest £5. Average risk per trade around £15 or so.
I'll give you credit for posting your P/L (a P/L doesn't actually prove anything, they're easily edited, but I'm not doubting it), they are good results. You've still got a lot to learn though, if you think people without edges break even.On_The_Edge wrote: ↑Sat Jan 29, 2022 7:45 pmSomething for anyone who claims I am making bets up:Screenshot (160).png
Only 39 markets in the last 7 days. Not enough football action at the moment. Most bets / trades were placed as I was out and about on my phone betfair app, with virtually no time spent on watching the match apart from two-three instances. Still reasonable profit.
Largest stake used about £35, smallest £5. Average risk per trade around £15 or so.
Even if the market were efficient, everyone who came to the exchange would be a long run loser. With a 2% average commission, and a perfectly efficient market the long run expected value of each bet is 0.98 of the efficient market return (ie you are starting behind - you need an edge just to break even).On_The_Edge wrote: ↑Sat Jan 29, 2022 2:52 amAnd I mean under some kind of hypothesis that the market is efficient in general more or less... not a situation when the market continuously gives an unfair price
When people place bets at random long term they will sometimes hit value bets sometimes not... this will all even out but it might take tens of thousands of trials
Come on do I really need to spell everything out here
Ps under perfectly efficient market people exactly should break even long term
Let me see a person comes along with a £100 bank and bets £1 radomly - for our experiement this person always bets on odds of 100. So for every 100 bets they can expect to lose 99 times and win 1 once. After every 100 bets they yield 97% of their starting balance (£99 x 0.98). After 1000 bets the expected return is 73% of their starting balance - so they are feeling ok - very likely their account has been well in the positive, assuming the first winner didn't come in at the last roll of the dice. After 10,000 bets the expected return is £0, that bank is blown. In fact, that bank is generally gone (mathematically) from the 2000 bet point in this example.On_The_Edge wrote: ↑Sat Jan 29, 2022 2:17 amBecause averaging requires hundreds, or better thousands of bets
Dead wrong. Again you need a thought experiment.On_The_Edge wrote: ↑Fri Jan 28, 2022 9:08 pmSure. But in the end, even when someone doesn't have an edge, I assume they are just going to end break even over a long run. So there's no real risk here.
I'd say that a bulk of the profits come from people (a) had no sensible staking plan / made bad emotional decisions regardless if they had an edge or not, (b) or did not place enough trades for their losses and profits to average out , or gave up too quickly, (c) people / bookies deliberately "trying" to lose, i.e. offload their positions, or (d) people consistently taking "bad" odds without realising it (I guess something like acca , although that's typically what mug punters do at bookmakers).gazuty wrote: ↑Sun Jan 30, 2022 4:56 am
There are people on this forum that are profitable year in, year out, year after year. I myself have been profitable for more than 10 years in a row and others have been profitable since the inception of the exchange.
Where did those profits come from? If money was just going around and around I wouldn't be profitable and neither would any other long term participant. Our money would have all been taken by the BF rake.
The statistics show that something like 98% of exchange participants are not profitable and fewer than 2% of participants have made long term profits.
Risk / liability is somewhat proportional to the odds... So above I'd use say £35 if backing at 1.5, or liability of £5 if laying at 1.1.Trader Pat wrote: ↑Sat Jan 29, 2022 8:13 pmAre you aiming for a similiar profit per bet or similiar liability/risk per bet?On_The_Edge wrote: ↑Sat Jan 29, 2022 7:45 pmLargest stake used about £35, smallest £5. Average risk per trade around £15 or so.
If you're not you'll skew the P&L
I never seen it before but seems quite worth a watchDerek27 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 01, 2022 4:55 amI just happened to be watching this tonight and it immediately reminded me of this thread.
https://ok.ru/video/3020982586036?fromTime=50
Derek27 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 01, 2022 4:55 amI just happened to be watching this tonight and it immediately reminded me of this thread.
https://ok.ru/video/3020982586036?fromTime=50
Chris Barrie's playing OTE, Craig Charles is playing me, Danny-John Jules plays Gazuty.plasteredric wrote: ↑Wed Feb 02, 2022 11:59 amDerek27 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 01, 2022 4:55 amI just happened to be watching this tonight and it immediately reminded me of this thread.
https://ok.ru/video/3020982586036?fromTime=50
On_The_Edge wrote: ↑Mon Jan 17, 2022 4:20 amYou may not find it interesting. Someone else might.