I think we both mean the same thing
i.e. the highest price of Runner1 (in the last 10 mins), the highest price of Runner2, the highest price of RunnerN etc. and the same (lowest price). Yes?Today's Horse Racing
-
firlandsfarm
- Posts: 3317
- Joined: Sat May 03, 2014 8:20 am
i.e. the highest price of Runner1 (in the last 10 mins), the highest price of Runner2, the highest price of RunnerN etc. and the same (lowest price). Yes?-
ShaunWhite
- Posts: 10403
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 3:42 am
That's right.firlandsfarm wrote: ↑Tue May 28, 2019 5:28 pmI think we both mean the same thing
what bothers me is ihad a lay on the fav followed theodds on the race change on the fav as if it was running thought it had won untill the line when it lost, they now tell me it was withdrawn before the race so what odds was i watching, surely it it had been withdrawn then odds should have been 1000 were they making the odds up!
-
ShaunWhite
- Posts: 10403
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 3:42 am
It would have been bots trading that horse and they were oblivious to the withdrawal. Flesh and blood punters wouldn't be laying it out to 1000 as they know their bets would have been voided. It's a fairly common occurence in when there's a withdrawal and there's no time to reform the market.alun63 wrote: ↑Tue May 28, 2019 6:25 pmwhat bothers me is ihad a lay on the fav followed theodds on the race change on the fav as if it was running thought it had won untill the line when it lost, they now tell me it was withdrawn before the race so what odds was i watching, surely it it had been withdrawn then odds should have been 1000 were they making the odds up!
-
spreadbetting
- Posts: 3140
- Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 8:06 pm
Not bots, Shaun, usually users hoping to trick bots to come out to play 
-
firlandsfarm
- Posts: 3317
- Joined: Sat May 03, 2014 8:20 am
ShaunWhite wrote: ↑Tue May 28, 2019 7:06 pmIt would have been bots trading that horse and they were oblivious to the withdrawal. Flesh and blood punters wouldn't be laying it out to 1000 as they know their bets would have been voided. It's a fairly common occurence in when there's a withdrawal and there's no time to reform the market.
I'm trying to understand this sub-thread … if anyone/bot had placed an in-running bet on the withdrawn favourite obviously it would have been voided but if the bet offered on the non-runner took the back book under 100% I assume the bots would have dived in to a false market and that would have been tough, yes? So someone could have fun with the bots by deliberately distorting the book to below 100% and exploit the bots hunger by 'forcing' it to take a bet on another runner to the bot's disadvantage! Yes? Complicated but not for a bot.spreadbetting wrote: ↑Tue May 28, 2019 7:19 pmNot bots, Shaun, usually users hoping to trick bots to come out to play
There weren't any lay prices available, it was 1000 at back price. Maybe you should set it to take SP.
