question is, was that well said james or jim

Place all those you deem beneath you on your ignore list!
Hold my beer!
Yeah I agree with that. I haven't posted much lately because I'm making a conscious effort not to end up in circular arguments with idiots, trolls or zealots but not to worry Derek continues to fight the good fight in our name!
I've used IPT since its inception and was one of the beta testers.jimibt wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 3:24 pmwhile you guys are ping ponging around, thought i'd ask for an alternative opinion on something that is somewhat related.
there's a service out there called IPT which offers a visually compelling view of the stats as they occur in real-time. is there any concensus out there as to how viable it is using this approach. they seem to have developed a few algos around what they call pressure indexes, so wondered if a similar appraoch could be used to identify and exploit edges in a similar fashion to what psychoff is observing while watching the markets games live.
Okay. I`m offering one to one tuition to anyone who wants it for £10K an hour. Who's going to compete with me?jamesg46 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 5:22 pmI dont have an issue with Psychoff but as for a fan I dont recall ever meeting or talking with him. I'm simply pointing out the basics of supply and demand & if there was any value in it for others who could compete, they would. The fact that they haven't suggests it either not worth their time or the knowledge they hold is worth more than you estimate.
I do variations of Goalwatch and HTO, using PI stats (amongst others). Automated and using my own pre match and then IPT in-play. Works well for meODPaul82 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 7:02 pmI've used IPT since its inception and was one of the beta testers.jimibt wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 3:24 pmwhile you guys are ping ponging around, thought i'd ask for an alternative opinion on something that is somewhat related.
there's a service out there called IPT which offers a visually compelling view of the stats as they occur in real-time. is there any concensus out there as to how viable it is using this approach. they seem to have developed a few algos around what they call pressure indexes, so wondered if a similar appraoch could be used to identify and exploit edges in a similar fashion to what psychoff is observing while watching the markets games live.
There's not much to the calculation of the indicators, PI1 & PI2. Higher the number the more pressure there is (i.e. multiple shots on/off) during a timeframe so theoretically the higher the number the more likelihood of a goal(s).
There's a chatroom with knowledgeable people in it and numerous beginners, I tend not to go in there too much these days as it's just a distraction for me.
Most of the people are looking for overs and there are a number of strategies (off the top of my head 9) that get implemented but everyone is only ever horny for two of them (goalwatch and HTO [which is Half Time Overs, not Horny Transvestite Goats despite my plea's to call it that])
I personally use the PI as an indicator to get out of a game as I do unders swings and nothing else these days in footie.
[Edit] I forgot to mention you also get what they call DI% (Draw Inflation) for a couple of games which comes from a sister pre-match trading website. The DI% is based on a bivariate distribution, the paper where someone applied it to football games is available on the tinterweb somewhere
Clint was my mainstay for over 10 years which GW is pretty much based on. I'm pretty much full-on with the tennis and better returns with the unders that it was one less thing for me to try and be multi-tasking with
You've only got a monopoly if there is demand... but I know you understand supply & demand. Then again some traders didn't know if price action was transferable from financial to sports marketsDerek27 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 7:06 pmOkay. I`m offering one to one tuition to anyone who wants it for £10K an hour. Who's going to compete with me?jamesg46 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 5:22 pmI dont have an issue with Psychoff but as for a fan I dont recall ever meeting or talking with him. I'm simply pointing out the basics of supply and demand & if there was any value in it for others who could compete, they would. The fact that they haven't suggests it either not worth their time or the knowledge they hold is worth more than you estimate.
By your own admission, if there's any value for others to compete they would. Looks like I've got a monopoly at this level, nobody else commands that sort of fee.![]()
Is there a demand for Phychoff's tuition? Are people falling over themselves to pay £24,000? I trust you know the answer because you said...jamesg46 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 7:48 pmYou've only got a monopoly if there is demand... but I know you understand supply & demand. Then again some traders didn't know if price action was transferable from financial to sports marketsDerek27 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 7:06 pmOkay. I`m offering one to one tuition to anyone who wants it for £10K an hour. Who's going to compete with me?jamesg46 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 5:22 pmI dont have an issue with Psychoff but as for a fan I dont recall ever meeting or talking with him. I'm simply pointing out the basics of supply and demand & if there was any value in it for others who could compete, they would. The fact that they haven't suggests it either not worth their time or the knowledge they hold is worth more than you estimate.
By your own admission, if there's any value for others to compete they would. Looks like I've got a monopoly at this level, nobody else commands that sort of fee.![]()
oh and that one who asked why not just use ema, without ever taking a second to realise that a moving average is a.lagging indicator of previous price action, so at this point it wouldn't suprise me if supply and demand wasn't something in your researched locker.
Like I've said, if the price is too high iyo then there is a valuable gap in that market place where you can offer a service. If you can't & you're unable to compete with him then leave the arena... don't walk around screaming rip off if you aren't or can't provide an alternative (with similar credentials)for people to either go to or compare against.
Check out the testimonials on his website for yourself, there seems to have been previous demand... as for his current order book I have no idea and nor do I care because I'm not the one being a melt over his business.Derek27 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 8:08 pmIs there a demand for Phychoff's tuition? Are people falling over themselves to pay £24,000? I trust you know the answer because you said...jamesg46 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 7:48 pmYou've only got a monopoly if there is demand... but I know you understand supply & demand. Then again some traders didn't know if price action was transferable from financial to sports marketsDerek27 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 7:06 pm
Okay. I`m offering one to one tuition to anyone who wants it for £10K an hour. Who's going to compete with me?
By your own admission, if there's any value for others to compete they would. Looks like I've got a monopoly at this level, nobody else commands that sort of fee.![]()
oh and that one who asked why not just use ema, without ever taking a second to realise that a moving average is a.lagging indicator of previous price action, so at this point it wouldn't suprise me if supply and demand wasn't something in your researched locker.
Like I've said, if the price is too high iyo then there is a valuable gap in that market place where you can offer a service. If you can't & you're unable to compete with him then leave the arena... don't walk around screaming rip off if you aren't or can't provide an alternative (with similar credentials)for people to either go to or compare against.
Clearly you don't know yourself, which contradicts your supply and demand argument. I've looked at the testimonials. There's no feedback from anyone who's done the £24K course. Interestingly, there is a trader who was full-time for two years before he did the basic course.