
1.01 loser statistics
-
- Posts: 747
- Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 3:58 pm
heheh...
an other surprise..
The Reaper 1.01 96.39 Lay 10-Jun-11 17:13 10-Jun-11 18:22 96.39
The Reaper 1.01 47.61 Lay 10-Jun-11 17:13 10-Jun-11 18:22 47.61


The Reaper 1.01 96.39 Lay 10-Jun-11 17:13 10-Jun-11 18:22 96.39
The Reaper 1.01 47.61 Lay 10-Jun-11 17:13 10-Jun-11 18:22 47.61
-
- Posts: 747
- Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 3:58 pm
6 races today
2 horses matched @ 1.01 @ 2.10PM and If Im not wrong (I failed to record it) 2 horses matched 1.02 on an other race..
2 horses matched @ 1.01 @ 2.10PM and If Im not wrong (I failed to record it) 2 horses matched 1.02 on an other race..
-
- Posts: 747
- Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 3:58 pm
I was just about to post that...heheh
£17 matched on Ajzal @ 1.03 and 3.4K @ 1.04
£17 matched on Ajzal @ 1.03 and 3.4K @ 1.04
-
- Posts: 747
- Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 3:58 pm
I missed the 1.01stevequal wrote:14:40 16th Plump. Big one there. 8k matched at 1.01.


I watched the race, I knew I missed a big shot.
-
- Posts: 747
- Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 3:58 pm
ofc Jeff
You only need to do a quick math..
You only need to do a quick math..
Ferru123 wrote:Would you have made a profit had you laid the field in every race at 1.3?
Jeff
Bet Angel wrote:Excluding today there have been 104 losers at 1.30 or less so far this year.
-
- Posts: 747
- Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 3:58 pm
Maybe not so sure anymore.
I was not around the 1st and the 2nd.
I was not around the 1st and the 2nd.
enzabella2009 wrote:ofc Jeff
You only need to do a quick math..Ferru123 wrote:Would you have made a profit had you laid the field in every race at 1.3?
Jeff
Bet Angel wrote:Excluding today there have been 104 losers at 1.30 or less so far this year.
Prior to today, 51 meetings have been scheduled to take place so far this year (source: http://www.britishhorseracing.com/gorac ... relist.asp).
OK, some will have been cancelled due to the weather, but to keep things simple, let's imagine that they haven't been!
So 51 meetings * 7 races per meeting = 357 races
So on 357 occasions, we laid at 1.3 and lost. Laying to win a unit's profit, those lays cost us 0.3 * 357 = 107 points
From the 104 horses that hit 1.3 but were gubbed, we made 104 points, minus commission.
So overall, we'd have lost money, but not much!
*Offers Stef some humble pie*
Jeff
OK, some will have been cancelled due to the weather, but to keep things simple, let's imagine that they haven't been!
So 51 meetings * 7 races per meeting = 357 races
So on 357 occasions, we laid at 1.3 and lost. Laying to win a unit's profit, those lays cost us 0.3 * 357 = 107 points
From the 104 horses that hit 1.3 but were gubbed, we made 104 points, minus commission.
So overall, we'd have lost money, but not much!

*Offers Stef some humble pie*

Jeff
enzabella2009 wrote:ofc Jeff
You only need to do a quick math..
-
- Posts: 747
- Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 3:58 pm
Hi Jeff,
I had no intention to sound arrogante.
However I missed the busiest days, that`s why my stats are showing I am up by laying short odds field..
I had no intention to sound arrogante.
However I missed the busiest days, that`s why my stats are showing I am up by laying short odds field..