I can't imagine Betfair would maintain a seperate account for horseracing.AnxiousBettor wrote: ↑Tue Sep 05, 2023 5:00 pmHopefully the affordability checks won't apply to horseracing.
Gambling Review White Paper update
- ShaunWhite
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 3:42 am
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2023 1:03 pm
I'm on about sportsbooks.ShaunWhite wrote: ↑Tue Sep 05, 2023 6:08 pmI can't imagine Betfair would maintain a seperate account for horseracing.AnxiousBettor wrote: ↑Tue Sep 05, 2023 5:00 pmHopefully the affordability checks won't apply to horseracing.
Well there used to be a UK and Australian wallet so it can be done.ShaunWhite wrote: ↑Tue Sep 05, 2023 6:08 pmI can't imagine Betfair would maintain a seperate account for horseracing.AnxiousBettor wrote: ↑Tue Sep 05, 2023 5:00 pmHopefully the affordability checks won't apply to horseracing.
- ShaunWhite
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 3:42 am
As expected, these things are a waste of time...
"Rhodes said the body’s aim was to “implement what the white paper says" "
It's just a stream of platitudes and obfuscation, again.
And although doing "nothing at all" would sound OK for most people, our situation takes a bit more explaining than a score on a credit file so it's utterly missing the issues raised by the professional gambling community. We actually need to have some 'friction' so they can actually establish that we're not just punters. There's no mention of exemptions at all.
"Rhodes said the body’s aim was to “implement what the white paper says" "
It's just a stream of platitudes and obfuscation, again.
And although doing "nothing at all" would sound OK for most people, our situation takes a bit more explaining than a score on a credit file so it's utterly missing the issues raised by the professional gambling community. We actually need to have some 'friction' so they can actually establish that we're not just punters. There's no mention of exemptions at all.
- ShaunWhite
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 3:42 am
You didn't miss much. I kept on thinking they were going to get into the nitty gritty of how the checks would work, but no. I got the impression they don't have a clue on the details and are just trying to get the whole thing done so they can tick it off the to do list. Personal highlight was the questions about why employment status and postcode were added in despite not being in the white paper. The GC guy just outright denied they'd added that in. It was like he didn't understand the meaning of the English language,AnxiousBettor wrote: ↑Tue Sep 05, 2023 1:23 pmCan someone please give a break down of what was said? What is likely to change? I'm primarily a value bettor if that makes any difference.

-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2023 1:03 pm
So I could make up employment status for my clients' accounts?aperson wrote: ↑Tue Sep 05, 2023 7:35 pmYou didn't miss much. I kept on thinking they were going to get into the nitty gritty of how the checks would work, but no. I got the impression they don't have a clue on the details and are just trying to get the whole thing done so they can tick it off the to do list. Personal highlight was the questions about why employment status and postcode were added in despite not being in the white paper. The GC guy just outright denied they'd added that in. It was like he didn't understand the meaning of the English language,AnxiousBettor wrote: ↑Tue Sep 05, 2023 1:23 pmCan someone please give a break down of what was said? What is likely to change? I'm primarily a value bettor if that makes any difference.![]()
Not quite what I meant but they did admit there would be no way to check yours job title was accurate if they decide to ask for it.AnxiousBettor wrote: ↑Tue Sep 05, 2023 7:37 pmSo I could make up employment status for my clients' accounts?aperson wrote: ↑Tue Sep 05, 2023 7:35 pmYou didn't miss much. I kept on thinking they were going to get into the nitty gritty of how the checks would work, but no. I got the impression they don't have a clue on the details and are just trying to get the whole thing done so they can tick it off the to do list. Personal highlight was the questions about why employment status and postcode were added in despite not being in the white paper. The GC guy just outright denied they'd added that in. It was like he didn't understand the meaning of the English language,AnxiousBettor wrote: ↑Tue Sep 05, 2023 1:23 pmCan someone please give a break down of what was said? What is likely to change? I'm primarily a value bettor if that makes any difference.![]()
I was reading an article in the racing post yesterday where course bookmakers were saying that bigger punters were returning to the course to place their bets as at present 'affordability' checks havn't quite filtered through to the on-course markets.AnxiousBettor wrote: ↑Tue Sep 05, 2023 5:00 pmHopefully the affordability checks won't apply to horseracing.Michael5482 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 05, 2023 4:45 pmThe Racing Posts on today
https://www.racingpost.com/news/gamblin ... DG2t4ym4b/
I often spend time in bookies to watch my trades and have spoken with the odd 'big' punter and they are definitely being impacted/restricted. There seems to be some kind of spend trigger where the betting shop staff have to ask questions or perform some kind of interaction with the customers.
At Ladbrokes they seem to have some kind of spend trigger with their fruit machine players where after a certain spend limit is reached the staff have to approach the customers and ask them questions like what is their name amongst other things which often provokes irritated responses from the punters.
I was thinking that doing half the action on betfair and half on betdaq and then using each as source of income towards the other could be the way forward.
With a single customer view this might not work though :/
Anyone got an idea whether or not the Republic of Ireland would be a good alternative to get out of this dystopian future?
With a single customer view this might not work though :/
Anyone got an idea whether or not the Republic of Ireland would be a good alternative to get out of this dystopian future?
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2023 1:03 pm
Time to get some clients.Sonny wrote: ↑Wed Sep 06, 2023 7:15 amI was thinking that doing half the action on betfair and half on betdaq and then using each as source of income towards the other could be the way forward.
With a single customer view this might not work though :/
Anyone got an idea whether or not the Republic of Ireland would be a good alternative to get out of this dystopian future?
??AnxiousBettor wrote: ↑Wed Sep 06, 2023 7:54 amTime to get some clients.Sonny wrote: ↑Wed Sep 06, 2023 7:15 amI was thinking that doing half the action on betfair and half on betdaq and then using each as source of income towards the other could be the way forward.
With a single customer view this might not work though :/
Anyone got an idea whether or not the Republic of Ireland would be a good alternative to get out of this dystopian future?
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2023 1:03 pm
Use one of Betfair or BETDAQ in a friend's name.jimibt wrote: ↑Wed Sep 06, 2023 9:51 am??AnxiousBettor wrote: ↑Wed Sep 06, 2023 7:54 amTime to get some clients.Sonny wrote: ↑Wed Sep 06, 2023 7:15 amI was thinking that doing half the action on betfair and half on betdaq and then using each as source of income towards the other could be the way forward.
With a single customer view this might not work though :/
Anyone got an idea whether or not the Republic of Ireland would be a good alternative to get out of this dystopian future?
- ShaunWhite
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 3:42 am
If you're profitable the simple solution is to avoid depositing. They'd only count as sources of income if you've been drawing a regular wage from them anyway.
But all this will be academic if Betfair volumes don't improve so rather than chatting about it, how about everyone getting some decent numbers though.
