Gambling Review White Paper update

A place to discuss anything.
Post Reply
User avatar
ShaunWhite
Posts: 10378
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 3:42 am

AnxiousBettor wrote:
Tue Sep 05, 2023 5:00 pm
Hopefully the affordability checks won't apply to horseracing.
I can't imagine Betfair would maintain a seperate account for horseracing.
AnxiousBettor
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2023 1:03 pm

ShaunWhite wrote:
Tue Sep 05, 2023 6:08 pm
AnxiousBettor wrote:
Tue Sep 05, 2023 5:00 pm
Hopefully the affordability checks won't apply to horseracing.
I can't imagine Betfair would maintain a seperate account for horseracing.
I'm on about sportsbooks.
User avatar
Euler
Posts: 26249
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 1:39 pm

ShaunWhite wrote:
Tue Sep 05, 2023 6:08 pm
AnxiousBettor wrote:
Tue Sep 05, 2023 5:00 pm
Hopefully the affordability checks won't apply to horseracing.
I can't imagine Betfair would maintain a seperate account for horseracing.
Well there used to be a UK and Australian wallet so it can be done.
User avatar
Derek27
Posts: 25158
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2017 11:44 am

Capture.GIF

...we don't give a fuck about the safety of non-UK residents. :lol:
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
ShaunWhite
Posts: 10378
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 3:42 am

As expected, these things are a waste of time...

"Rhodes said the body’s aim was to “implement what the white paper says" "

It's just a stream of platitudes and obfuscation, again.


And although doing "nothing at all" would sound OK for most people, our situation takes a bit more explaining than a score on a credit file so it's utterly missing the issues raised by the professional gambling community. We actually need to have some 'friction' so they can actually establish that we're not just punters. There's no mention of exemptions at all.
User avatar
ShaunWhite
Posts: 10378
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 3:42 am

Euler wrote:
Tue Sep 05, 2023 6:19 pm
Well there used to be a UK and Australian wallet so it can be done.
That's true, but if we get down to saying you can bet on a horse but not a dog then the govt really has lost the plot.
User avatar
aperson
Posts: 212
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2013 5:23 pm

AnxiousBettor wrote:
Tue Sep 05, 2023 1:23 pm
Can someone please give a break down of what was said? What is likely to change? I'm primarily a value bettor if that makes any difference.
You didn't miss much. I kept on thinking they were going to get into the nitty gritty of how the checks would work, but no. I got the impression they don't have a clue on the details and are just trying to get the whole thing done so they can tick it off the to do list. Personal highlight was the questions about why employment status and postcode were added in despite not being in the white paper. The GC guy just outright denied they'd added that in. It was like he didn't understand the meaning of the English language, :roll:
AnxiousBettor
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2023 1:03 pm

aperson wrote:
Tue Sep 05, 2023 7:35 pm
AnxiousBettor wrote:
Tue Sep 05, 2023 1:23 pm
Can someone please give a break down of what was said? What is likely to change? I'm primarily a value bettor if that makes any difference.
You didn't miss much. I kept on thinking they were going to get into the nitty gritty of how the checks would work, but no. I got the impression they don't have a clue on the details and are just trying to get the whole thing done so they can tick it off the to do list. Personal highlight was the questions about why employment status and postcode were added in despite not being in the white paper. The GC guy just outright denied they'd added that in. It was like he didn't understand the meaning of the English language, :roll:
So I could make up employment status for my clients' accounts?
User avatar
aperson
Posts: 212
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2013 5:23 pm

AnxiousBettor wrote:
Tue Sep 05, 2023 7:37 pm
aperson wrote:
Tue Sep 05, 2023 7:35 pm
AnxiousBettor wrote:
Tue Sep 05, 2023 1:23 pm
Can someone please give a break down of what was said? What is likely to change? I'm primarily a value bettor if that makes any difference.
You didn't miss much. I kept on thinking they were going to get into the nitty gritty of how the checks would work, but no. I got the impression they don't have a clue on the details and are just trying to get the whole thing done so they can tick it off the to do list. Personal highlight was the questions about why employment status and postcode were added in despite not being in the white paper. The GC guy just outright denied they'd added that in. It was like he didn't understand the meaning of the English language, :roll:
So I could make up employment status for my clients' accounts?
Not quite what I meant but they did admit there would be no way to check yours job title was accurate if they decide to ask for it.
User avatar
ANGELS15
Posts: 896
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2017 9:57 am

AnxiousBettor wrote:
Tue Sep 05, 2023 5:00 pm
Michael5482 wrote:
Tue Sep 05, 2023 4:45 pm
The Racing Posts on today

https://www.racingpost.com/news/gamblin ... DG2t4ym4b/
Hopefully the affordability checks won't apply to horseracing.
I was reading an article in the racing post yesterday where course bookmakers were saying that bigger punters were returning to the course to place their bets as at present 'affordability' checks havn't quite filtered through to the on-course markets.

I often spend time in bookies to watch my trades and have spoken with the odd 'big' punter and they are definitely being impacted/restricted. There seems to be some kind of spend trigger where the betting shop staff have to ask questions or perform some kind of interaction with the customers.

At Ladbrokes they seem to have some kind of spend trigger with their fruit machine players where after a certain spend limit is reached the staff have to approach the customers and ask them questions like what is their name amongst other things which often provokes irritated responses from the punters.
User avatar
Sonny
Posts: 43
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2021 11:34 am

I was thinking that doing half the action on betfair and half on betdaq and then using each as source of income towards the other could be the way forward.
With a single customer view this might not work though :/

Anyone got an idea whether or not the Republic of Ireland would be a good alternative to get out of this dystopian future?
AnxiousBettor
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2023 1:03 pm

Sonny wrote:
Wed Sep 06, 2023 7:15 am
I was thinking that doing half the action on betfair and half on betdaq and then using each as source of income towards the other could be the way forward.
With a single customer view this might not work though :/

Anyone got an idea whether or not the Republic of Ireland would be a good alternative to get out of this dystopian future?
Time to get some clients.
User avatar
jimibt
Posts: 4193
Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2015 6:42 pm

AnxiousBettor wrote:
Wed Sep 06, 2023 7:54 am
Sonny wrote:
Wed Sep 06, 2023 7:15 am
I was thinking that doing half the action on betfair and half on betdaq and then using each as source of income towards the other could be the way forward.
With a single customer view this might not work though :/

Anyone got an idea whether or not the Republic of Ireland would be a good alternative to get out of this dystopian future?
Time to get some clients.
??
AnxiousBettor
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2023 1:03 pm

jimibt wrote:
Wed Sep 06, 2023 9:51 am
AnxiousBettor wrote:
Wed Sep 06, 2023 7:54 am
Sonny wrote:
Wed Sep 06, 2023 7:15 am
I was thinking that doing half the action on betfair and half on betdaq and then using each as source of income towards the other could be the way forward.
With a single customer view this might not work though :/

Anyone got an idea whether or not the Republic of Ireland would be a good alternative to get out of this dystopian future?
Time to get some clients.
??
Use one of Betfair or BETDAQ in a friend's name.
User avatar
ShaunWhite
Posts: 10378
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 3:42 am

Sonny wrote:
Wed Sep 06, 2023 7:15 am
I was thinking that doing half the action on betfair and half on betdaq and then using each as source of income towards the other could be the way forward.
If you're profitable the simple solution is to avoid depositing. They'd only count as sources of income if you've been drawing a regular wage from them anyway.

But all this will be academic if Betfair volumes don't improve so rather than chatting about it, how about everyone getting some decent numbers though. :)
Post Reply

Return to “General discussion”