UK General Election July 4th 2024 - Trading ONLY thread
Things could have been so different. Without all the partying, especially on or before the Queen's funeral, there would have been more focus on the positives like rolling out the vaccine. There may not have been a Covid inquiry, in which case, the fact that he's got the mathematical brain of a ten-year-old and doesn't understand basic graphs would never have surfaced.Euler wrote: ↑Wed Jul 03, 2024 7:01 pmWhen Covid struck that was the moment. It was impossible to overcome that. Labour could have put 'we will euthanise all pets' in their manifesto and they would still get into power.
In 5 or 10 years time, something will happen and everybody will vote for the other guys. It's a sort of flaw with democracy. But at least we have one.
Also, he may not have been chased out of office, as that was hard enough despite everything he did, so Liz Truss would never have crashed the economy, and he could have been fighting an election in a better position.

It's not often you'll hear me say something positive about a Tory leader, but here it is; I'll credit Sunak for putting all his cock-ups behind him and fighting to the end. He knows he's lost, but he's still soldiering on and rallying his troops. 

-
- Posts: 4478
- Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2019 8:25 am
Maybe, just maybe, he will pick a fight with Putin tomorrow, declare the UK at war and call off the election.

tbh I don't think covid changed my view of the Tory management for the last 14 years. Covid was a grenade that all governments across the globe had to deal with. We did no worse than the US for example but not as well as Germany. OK fair enough. I don't even care about partygate. I will vote Labour tomorrow because the Tory's have lost credibility in running the economy and the country and have imploded into party infighting.Euler wrote: ↑Wed Jul 03, 2024 7:01 pmWhen Covid struck that was the moment. It was impossible to overcome that. Labour could have put 'we will euthanise all pets' in their manifesto and they would still get into power.
In 5 or 10 years time, something will happen and everybody will vote for the other guys. It's a sort of flaw with democracy. But at least we have one.
"Fiddling while Rome burns" springs to mind.
-
- Posts: 4478
- Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2019 8:25 am
One thing worries me about Labour. They said they want a big majority as some of the decisions needed will be unpopular. What do they mean by that exactly ?, if they planning on pissing off millions of people that didn’t vote for them then those people are more likely to look to the far right type ideology that maybe about to happen in France, Germany and again in the USA. I wouldn’t have thought that’s a good exercise to embark on ? 
- firlandsfarm
- Posts: 3307
- Joined: Sat May 03, 2014 8:20 am
Totally agree Peter. The one thing people seem to forget when comparing rates is that IT enjoys a tax free allowance every year whereas CGT only gets an an allowance in the year of realisation so if the asset is held for 10 years that's 9 years without an allowance and only 1 year with! I would be happy for CGT to equate to the IT rate if CGT had a rate of inflation allowance i.e. it's only the real profit over the inflation rate that is taxed.Euler wrote: ↑Wed Jul 03, 2024 5:21 pmLots of people I know aren't taking any chances. It's in Labour's DNA to tax and spend. Also raising CGT to the same level as Income tax doesn't make any sense. It will kill investment.Archery1969 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 03, 2024 5:13 pmThe Financial Times is reporting that the wealthy are selling shares and property amid fears Labour will raise capital gains tax.
Better safe than funding a free-spending politician's ego.
-
- Posts: 1605
- Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2015 9:38 am
mmmm, saw 10 folk voting this morning.... usually only see 1 or 2... (and that's in the safest labour seat in Scot)...
Isn't the current tax burden the highest it's ever been? Under a Tory decade and a half. (Was never any good at mathsfirlandsfarm wrote: ↑Thu Jul 04, 2024 9:42 amTotally agree Peter. The one thing people seem to forget when comparing rates is that IT enjoys a tax free allowance every year whereas CGT only gets an an allowance in the year of realisation so if the asset is held for 10 years that's 9 years without an allowance and only 1 year with! I would be happy for CGT to equate to the IT rate if CGT had a rate of inflation allowance i.e. it's only the real profit over the inflation rate that is taxed.Euler wrote: ↑Wed Jul 03, 2024 5:21 pmLots of people I know aren't taking any chances. It's in Labour's DNA to tax and spend. Also raising CGT to the same level as Income tax doesn't make any sense. It will kill investment.Archery1969 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 03, 2024 5:13 pmThe Financial Times is reporting that the wealthy are selling shares and property amid fears Labour will raise capital gains tax.
Better safe than funding a free-spending politician's ego.

I guess opinions come down to which tax they have to pay. CGT makes zero difference to my finances. If I had that amount of money I would be happy to contribute providing it's used well. And there's the issue. How well have the taxes of the last decade etc been used?
-
- Posts: 1605
- Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2015 9:38 am
"Come with me to another country, far, far away, where things are a little bit different. In this fantastical land, young people can live and work in any country in Europe. You can swim in a river without catching Weil’s disease, or see your doctor.
Things aren’t perfect in this country, but 40,000 people rely on food banks instead of 3.1 million. People live half a year longer. Five-year-olds are taller.
Reader, you’ll never guess what. That country is Britain! Or it was until 2010, when a parade of five Conservative prime ministers, seven chancellors and eight home secretaries (two of whom were Suella Braverman) climbed behind the wheel of Britain’s temperamental but mostly reliable family hatchback, and drove it into a hedge."
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/ng ... government
A sobering reminder of what can happen when you have idiots in charge....
Can still get 2% on a labour majority !
Things aren’t perfect in this country, but 40,000 people rely on food banks instead of 3.1 million. People live half a year longer. Five-year-olds are taller.
Reader, you’ll never guess what. That country is Britain! Or it was until 2010, when a parade of five Conservative prime ministers, seven chancellors and eight home secretaries (two of whom were Suella Braverman) climbed behind the wheel of Britain’s temperamental but mostly reliable family hatchback, and drove it into a hedge."
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/ng ... government
A sobering reminder of what can happen when you have idiots in charge....
Can still get 2% on a labour majority !
I'm thinking Covid may have had a hand to play there?greenmark wrote: ↑Thu Jul 04, 2024 11:07 amIsn't the current tax burden the highest it's ever been? Under a Tory decade and a half. (Was never any good at maths).
I guess opinions come down to which tax they have to pay. CGT makes zero difference to my finances. If I had that amount of money I would be happy to contribute providing it's used well. And there's the issue. How well have the taxes of the last decade etc been used?
Personally, I've prefer debt levels to be as low as possible else you are basically working for whoever the bond holders are, and often that's foreign governments. Better to cut your cloth appropriately and spend all those interest payments on things that improve the quality of life for everybody. I haven't looked recently but the interest payments must be stupendous now.
The problem with CGT is say I buy a factory to start a business. Years later the business is struggling so I decided to close it. Inflation means it has a rebuild cost of £1.5m. According to the Goverment I have gained 500k when I haven't. Also I could have made a loss on my investment in starting that business, but I don't get a refund. So CGT should always be lower than income tax.
income tax is what you pay on a yielding asset and you can't have -ve income. But when you invest you run the real risk either in inflation or non inflationary terms of losing money, but you could still be taxed on it. It isn't worth investing in this environment.
I have large capital gains in the US on investments I have there. But the government wants me to pay them tax on those like income. No thanks, this isn't even money that has been made in the UK.
Can you see the problem with treated capital gains as income?