I've often wondered why people do it but now it makes sense: take if still available but don't leave as an offer. And I've just compared half the forum to flashers.

I've often wondered why people do it but now it makes sense: take if still available but don't leave as an offer. And I've just compared half the forum to flashers.
Strictly speaking all FOK orders cancel instantly if they're not matched on arrival, but some parts of the sports betting world have hijacked the term to describe orders that expire/auto cancel.
ShaunWhite wrote: ↑Sun Oct 31, 2021 1:24 amStrictly speaking all FOK orders cancel instantly if they're not matched on arrival, but some parts of the sports betting world have hijacked the term to describe orders that expire/auto cancel.
Betfair facilitate both, although I'm not sure why/if true FOKs ever appear as being unmatched because they never actually are.
Screenshot_9.jpg
I've done some work for bodies related to integrity and have seen direct evidence that 'insiders' are using this sort of technology to their advantage. Whether it is still going on is difficult to know. but it's like jelly. It's difficult to stamp on.
Way back people worked out a loophole in football betting like this.megarain wrote: ↑Mon Nov 01, 2021 12:39 amThere is a team sweeping up 100k orders on the T20 world Cup cricket, getting filed after 2 secs.
I wonder if they are submitting bets 3 secs before action (having sub-accounts fill liquidity), which they cancel if they dont want the bet, as limit isnt met.
Yesmegarain wrote: ↑Mon Nov 01, 2021 12:39 amThe min fill size worries me a bit.
Does this mean, that an order that sends a min fill size of say 50k, will get nothing matched unless 50k is available on the exchange ?
min fill size.jpg
When did this min fill size parameter become operational ?
There is a team sweeping up 100k orders on the T0 world Cup cricket, getting filed after 2 secs.
I wonder if they are submitting bets 3 secs before action (having sub-accounts fill liquidity), which they cancel if they dont want the bet, as limit isnt met.
I have been convinced that someone has found a loophole for quite some time now. Very clever on their part and they are cleaning up but very difficult to prove.Euler wrote: ↑Mon Nov 01, 2021 10:53 amWay back people worked out a loophole in football betting like this.megarain wrote: ↑Mon Nov 01, 2021 12:39 amThere is a team sweeping up 100k orders on the T20 world Cup cricket, getting filed after 2 secs.
I wonder if they are submitting bets 3 secs before action (having sub-accounts fill liquidity), which they cancel if they dont want the bet, as limit isnt met.