For the sanity of others I think we have exhausted this one I don't accept that a glass of wine doth a party make.
Nothing seems to get through to you! A glass of wine, party or not is irrelevant. The question is, did he break lock down rules? The police say he did, he's not contesting so the matter is settled and he was clearly lying when he said all rules were followed.
And what's not getting through to you is if he didn't think he was breaking the rules (which did not define what a party is) then he cannot be lying. The police didn't say he was lying. It would be like if I said you are a genius and then I find out you are not a genius I was not lying to say you were!
If you believe he was genuine you'll believe anything.
As far as I'm concerned, lying includes giving false information without thinking or caring if it's true, which is what BJ habitually does when denying wrongdoings.
He refused to answer Stamer's question of whether a party took place and kept repeating that no rules were broken. Starmer rightly pointed out that a party in itself would be breaking the rules. As BJ couldn't bring himself to answer you can safely assume he was lying.
Nothing seems to get through to you! A glass of wine, party or not is irrelevant. The question is, did he break lock down rules? The police say he did, he's not contesting so the matter is settled and he was clearly lying when he said all rules were followed.
And what's not getting through to you is if he didn't think he was breaking the rules (which did not define what a party is) then he cannot be lying. The police didn't say he was lying. It would be like if I said you are a genius and then I find out you are not a genius I was not lying to say you were!
If you believe he was genuine you'll believe anything.
As far as I'm concerned, lying includes giving false information without thinking or caring if it's true, which is what BJ habitually does when denying wrongdoings.
He refused to answer Stamer's question of whether a party took place and kept repeating that no rules were broken. Starmer rightly pointed out that a party in itself would be breaking the rules. As BJ couldn't bring himself to answer you can safely assume he was lying.
We are never going to agree (on my part because of the obvious inconsistencies and interpretations) so best left alone. You will always look for the edge against BJ and I will always look for the edge against your perceived edge! It's been fun.
I'm really surprised there's not more activity in the market after today's news.
Capture.GIF
It's the same as before and nothing's really changed. Boris is unlikely to resign whatever the result. And he's unlikely to be ousted because it's not the best time for internal instability and unlikely anyone else really wants the job right now anyway. Boris will probably be around until early 2024. Then he will be binned off for someone else to lead the Conservatives into the 2025 election.
I'm really surprised there's not more activity in the market after today's news.
Capture.GIF
BJ is going nowhere Derek (in both senses). His opponents (on either side of the house) don't want anything to do with his current remit. They'd rather stand aside (in the case of his party) or (in the case of the opposition) stand on the sidelines poking fun at him knowing they have no chance of inheriting power any time soon.
The government announces the "deadliest virus" in a century after showing videos of actors falling over in China, and that everyone must follow strict rules at the cost of destroying the economy, shaking up their social lives, bankrupting their businesses, disrupting their kids' education etc.
The people of the government completely ignore those rules and continue on as normal. Boris, Rishi, Sturgeon, Cummings, Hancock, Scotlands Chief Medical officer and the list goes on... yet still no one questions why those closest to the science weren't one bit afraid.
Most of these people multiply their net worth at the expense of the poor people, the biggest wealth transfer in history saw around $5 trillion indirectly transfered from the poorest majority to the richest minority in a zero-sum game within a period of 2 years. We are now only feeling the beginning of the costs of living crisis where energy, fuel and food prices will reduce the quality of life for the vast majority.
2.5 years on the data still indicates that the excess deaths amounted to that of a moderate flu season (this was actually obvious after 6 months, as was disproving measures as completely useless through common sense (trillions of social interactions in supermarkets ongoing) and countries such as Sweden which didn't adopt them where excess deaths were still normal). However, anyone that pointed out the facts and data was labelled as a conspiracy theorist by those blinded by emotion driven by images of 96 year olds dying in hospital broadcast on the BBC.
Still ignoring the elephant in the room, most people are only concerned in seeing billionaire Rishi being given a £100 fine, and that will be enough to satisfy them.
Infact what we have just witnessed is the first stage of a greater plan to collapse the current society which glorifies wasting resources, unsustainable debt and corruption. The global monetary system has reached the end of its unsustainable cycle and desperately needs a reset. It will be replaced with a more sustainable model which focuses on conserving resources by bringing down consumerism, private vehicle ownership and holidays abroad. Consumption at such a great level has only been this way for the last 40ish years but the time has came to put an end to it.
If we just allowed the population to grow and the resources to deplete it would only end in complete disaster with mass famine and nuclear war, changes had to be made but the only way to get people to accept those changes is to introduce crises and rely on emotional manipulation. A digital control grid and social credit system + authoritarian laws currently being sneaked into the UK + depopulation will make the great reset possible
The people of the government completely ignore those rules and continue on as normal. Boris, Rishi, Sturgeon, Cummings, Hancock, Scotlands Chief Medical officer and the list goes on... yet still no one questions why those closest to the science weren't one bit afraid.
I don't think it's fair to include Sturgeon in that list. Forgetting to put on your face mask is like wearing odd socks - we all know how sharp and dangerous blades are but still cut ourselves with them.
There are two main reasons why people who understand the science would still ignore the rules. One is the knowledge that it's perfectly safe to disregard the rules provided everybody else follows them, coupled with the delusion that you're the only one that's thought of it or the belief that you're higher than everybody else. The other is excessive testosterone caused by the opportunity to get your end away, stopping the brain from functioning normally. I reckon BJ, Hancock and Cummings are in the former category, Fergeson was in the latter.
2.5 years on the data still indicates that the excess deaths amounted to that of a moderate flu season [source needed] (this was actually obvious after 6 months [what's obvious to you is nonsense to everybody else], as was disproving measures as completely useless through common sense (trillions of social interactions in supermarkets ongoing) and countries such as Sweden which didn't adopt them where excess deaths were still normal). However, anyone that pointed out [what you believe to be] the facts and data was [correctly] labelled as a conspiracy theorist by those [who you believe to be] blinded by emotion driven by images of 96 year olds [and all the way down to 20 year olds] dying in hospital broadcast on the BBC.
I don't accept that a glass of wine doth a party make.
