
Psychoff Bank Management Example Discussion
-
- Posts: 518
- Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2019 10:51 pm
The thing is Kai, I backing that there will be less than 6 goals. I can't Lay for 1.06 and make a great profit if I think the game will end 1-1.
You bet pennies and you're concerned about liquidity.JustLukeYou wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2019 6:21 pmMy main concern with these markets is liquidity. Even I was able to trade for £100 a day how can I tell the liquidity is available in these markets?
At the moment I am doing anything very useful other than practicing. Let's say I traded at £10 and made £2 it is still not useful or making any positive impact.

If you scale up gradually you get a feel for liquidity in markets, with experience, but bet pennies and think about how many £100s you can get on and you'll be lost.
-
- Posts: 518
- Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2019 10:51 pm
Derek, I am not concerned about liquidity with pennies. I am talking about if I was trading larger sums of money. Into the £100's.Derek27 wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2019 7:55 pmYou bet pennies and you're concerned about liquidity.JustLukeYou wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2019 6:21 pmMy main concern with these markets is liquidity. Even I was able to trade for £100 a day how can I tell the liquidity is available in these markets?
At the moment I am doing anything very useful other than practicing. Let's say I traded at £10 and made £2 it is still not useful or making any positive impact.![]()
If you scale up gradually you get a feel for liquidity in markets, with experience, but bet pennies and think about how many £100s you can get on and you'll be lost.
What's the attraction of backing under 5.5 if you think there will be two goals? Why not lay over 2.5?JustLukeYou wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2019 7:02 pmThe thing is Kai, I backing that there will be less than 6 goals. I can't Lay for 1.06 and make a great profit if I think the game will end 1-1.
Stop thinking about trading large sums of money. Just think about how you're going to get to that position when you haven't even fully understood backing and laying!JustLukeYou wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2019 7:59 pmDerek, I am not concerned about liquidity with pennies. I am talking about if I was trading larger sums of money. Into the £100's.Derek27 wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2019 7:55 pmYou bet pennies and you're concerned about liquidity.JustLukeYou wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2019 6:21 pmMy main concern with these markets is liquidity. Even I was able to trade for £100 a day how can I tell the liquidity is available in these markets?
At the moment I am doing anything very useful other than practicing. Let's say I traded at £10 and made £2 it is still not useful or making any positive impact.![]()
If you scale up gradually you get a feel for liquidity in markets, with experience, but bet pennies and think about how many £100s you can get on and you'll be lost.
-
- Posts: 518
- Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2019 10:51 pm
Hi,Derek27 wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2019 8:02 pmStop thinking about trading large sums of money. Just think about how you're going to get to that position when you haven't even fully understood backing and laying!JustLukeYou wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2019 7:59 pmDerek, I am not concerned about liquidity with pennies. I am talking about if I was trading larger sums of money. Into the £100's.
I am trading out of my backs if they are not going to plan. As for lays they offer very little benefit to backing.
Did you not understand what Kai, Shaun and everybody else has said? Laying under x.5 is exactly the same as backing over x.5 and vice versa. It's the price you chose to get on that's important. Even beginners know you need to lay low and back high, but you've got it the wrong way round.
How do you manage to "trade out" your backs without laying?JustLukeYou wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2019 8:12 pm
I am trading out of my backs if they are not going to plan. As for lays they offer very little benefit to backing.
-
- Posts: 518
- Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2019 10:51 pm
But isn't there only a small benefit to laying? It still requires a large stake. For example, it make require £900 to lay instead of £1000 to back.Derek27 wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2019 8:50 pmDid you not understand what Kai, Shaun and everybody else has said? Laying under x.5 is exactly the same as backing over x.5 and vice versa. It's the price you chose to get on that's important. Even beginners know you need to lay low and back high, but you've got it the wrong way round.
If you lay a team at 1.1 for £100, how much money do you think you need to allow that transaction?JustLukeYou wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2019 8:55 pmBut isn't there only a small benefit to laying? It still requires a large stake. For example, it make require £900 to lay instead of £1000 to back.Derek27 wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2019 8:50 pmDid you not understand what Kai, Shaun and everybody else has said? Laying under x.5 is exactly the same as backing over x.5 and vice versa. It's the price you chose to get on that's important. Even beginners know you need to lay low and back high, but you've got it the wrong way round.
-
- Posts: 518
- Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2019 10:51 pm
£10 but that doesn't help. I backing that there will be less than 6 girls. Not more than 6 girls so I fail to see how this helps.Derek27 wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2019 9:02 pmIf you lay a team at 1.1 for £100, how much money do you think you need to allow that transaction?JustLukeYou wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2019 8:55 pmBut isn't there only a small benefit to laying? It still requires a large stake. For example, it make require £900 to lay instead of £1000 to back.Derek27 wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2019 8:50 pmDid you not understand what Kai, Shaun and everybody else has said? Laying under x.5 is exactly the same as backing over x.5 and vice versa. It's the price you chose to get on that's important. Even beginners know you need to lay low and back high, but you've got it the wrong way round.
Why do you need 6 girls - one's enough for me.
Can you not see that backing at 1.1 is exactly the same as laying the other side at 11.0?
I don't understand why you have an issue with laying when it's exactly the same thing. Laying at high odds or backing at short odds is not only highly risky but there's not much to gain. You can't make more than 10% at 1.1 even if you let the bet run, if you trade out you make even less, with the scope for the market to go badly against you if a girl is scored.

Can you not see that backing at 1.1 is exactly the same as laying the other side at 11.0?
I don't understand why you have an issue with laying when it's exactly the same thing. Laying at high odds or backing at short odds is not only highly risky but there's not much to gain. You can't make more than 10% at 1.1 even if you let the bet run, if you trade out you make even less, with the scope for the market to go badly against you if a girl is scored.