What news do you watch/read Alex? What makes you think that most people would be happy if Sunak gets a fine?alexmr2 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 22, 2022 1:54 amStill ignoring the elephant in the room, most people [?] are only concerned in seeing billionaire Rishi being given a £100 fine, and that will be enough to satisfy them.
Infact what we [you mean what you believe you] have just witnessed is the first stage of a greater plan to collapse the current society which glorifies wasting resources, unsustainable debt and corruption. The global monetary system has reached the end of its unsustainable cycle and desperately needs a reset. It will be replaced with a more sustainable model which focuses on conserving resources by bringing down consumerism, private vehicle ownership and holidays abroad. Consumption at such a great level has only been this way for the last 40ish years but the time has came to put an end to it.
If we just allowed the population to grow and the resources to deplete it would only end in complete disaster with mass famine and nuclear war [??? I think a connection should be made to nuclear war], changes had to be made but the only way to get people to accept those changes is to introduce crises and rely on emotional manipulation. A digital control grid and social credit system + authoritarian laws currently being sneaked into the UK + depopulation will make the great reset possible
boris and rishi partygate fines
-
Archery1969
- Posts: 4478
- Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2019 8:25 am
A police friend I know for 22 years says it’s common knowledge amongst the old Charring Cross force that 2 further fines have been signed off with a fourth waiting confirmation.
Looks like you will get your wish Derek.
But nobody in the Conservative party wants the job so further speculation that they won’t bother with replacing him and Judy go with the current deputy leader until the next general election. Not sure if that’s allowed but if so will cause chaos in the financial markets etc.
I doubt BJ will even bother going to see the Queen and just go in the middle of the night.
We shall see.
-
jamesedwards
- Posts: 3961
- Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2018 6:16 pm
-
jamesedwards
- Posts: 3961
- Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2018 6:16 pm
It was in the papers on 13th April that there was going to be 3 or 4 fines. It doesn't sound like anything has changed, just the media regurgitating the same story.Archery1969 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 23, 2022 1:02 amA police friend I know for 22 years says it’s common knowledge amongst the old Charring Cross force that 2 further fines have been signed off with a fourth waiting confirmation.
Looks like you will get your wish Derek.
But nobody in the Conservative party wants the job so further speculation that they won’t bother with replacing him and Judy go with the current deputy leader until the next general election. Not sure if that’s allowed but if so will cause chaos in the financial markets etc.
I doubt BJ will even bother going to see the Queen and just go in the middle of the night.
We shall see.
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/ ... e-26708169
Not the market but the situation. Fixed penalty notices are oven-ready, let's get partygate done.jamesedwards wrote: ↑Sat Apr 23, 2022 1:47 amAre you up to your eyeballs in this market or something?
Nothing wrong with listening to your favourite song again and again.jamesedwards wrote: ↑Sat Apr 23, 2022 1:48 amIt doesn't sound like anything has changed, just the media regurgitating the same story.
I keep hearing the words "no obvious successor", again and again. It doesn't say much for the Conservative party when the only man suitable for leading it is viewed by many, even within his own party, as a pathological liar, law-breaker, hypocrite, fantasist, deluded, uncaring, bully, etc.Archery1969 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 23, 2022 1:02 amBut nobody in the Conservative party wants the job so further speculation that they won’t bother with replacing him and Judy go with the current deputy leader until the next general election.
-
Archery1969
- Posts: 4478
- Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2019 8:25 am
True but the public keep voting them back in.Derek27 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 24, 2022 1:51 amI keep hearing the words "no obvious successor", again and again. It doesn't say much for the Conservative party when the only man suitable for leading it is viewed by many, even within his own party, as a pathological liar, law-breaker, hypocrite, fantasist, deluded, uncaring, bully, etc.Archery1969 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 23, 2022 1:02 amBut nobody in the Conservative party wants the job so further speculation that they won’t bother with replacing him and Judy go with the current deputy leader until the next general election.
-
firlandsfarm
- Posts: 3316
- Joined: Sat May 03, 2014 8:20 am
I still don't understand why working with colleagues in a confined space (office) is OK but having a glass of wine with those same people in an open space (garden) is deemed against the rules! Seems to me it's the rules that are stupid!
If I was in charge of a department that had worked together in an office I wouldn't see anything wrong in them having a drink together in that same office or outside. And if asked if I broke the rules common-sense would cause me to answer "No". Is another strain of COVID that I haven't heard of that is only contagious when having a drink?
If I was in charge of a department that had worked together in an office I wouldn't see anything wrong in them having a drink together in that same office or outside. And if asked if I broke the rules common-sense would cause me to answer "No". Is another strain of COVID that I haven't heard of that is only contagious when having a drink?
It's not against the rules, but as I keep telling you, the glass of wine had nothing to do with it.firlandsfarm wrote: ↑Sun Apr 24, 2022 5:30 pmI still don't understand why working with colleagues in a confined space (office) is OK but having a glass of wine with those same people in an open space (garden) is deemed against the rules! Seems to me it's the rules that are stupid!
If I was in charge of a department that had worked together in an office I wouldn't see anything wrong in them having a drink together in that same office or outside. And if asked if I broke the rules common-sense would cause me to answer "No". Is another strain of COVID that I haven't heard of that is only contagious when having a drink?
Gatherings of more than two people inside were banned by law. An exception was allowed if the gathering "was reasonably necessary" for work purposes.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-59577129
If BJ can decide visiting a dying relative or attending the funeral isn't necessary he can't argue that his birthday gathering (which didn't consist of colleagues he would have been with anyway) was reasonably necessary. He keeps arguing that it was only a brief gathering but he didn't say you can't mix households unless it's brief. If I remember correctly the limit to a funeral was about six people but 30 were allowed to attend his birthday do!
It was made worse by the fact that he made the rules, students got fined £10K for breaking them and when he was caught he repeatedly lied about it.
Last edited by Derek27 on Sun Apr 24, 2022 6:20 pm, edited 3 times in total.