Quite right.... that's 1-0 to you Shaun..ShaunWhite wrote: ↑Sun Nov 17, 2019 1:59 amYou shouldn't be allowed to just enter 6 x 1-nils. That's not playing fair. The rest of us are trying to predict the actual scores not just win on a stats based TKO. Booooooooooooo![]()
SKY Soccer Saturday Super 6
- wearthefoxhat
- Posts: 3554
- Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2018 9:55 am
- ruthlessimon
- Posts: 2146
- Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2016 3:54 pm
Don't have a go at me!! Tom & peter started it!!!!!!
In 3yrs I have never seen Tom do anything different to 1-0 or 2-0


Tbf it's nice seeing james lead, cos he has been brave
I aint touching 1-1 with a barge pole atm!!
The last time I counted 1-1 was a cs for me 5 times (I think) although i do feel like I'm over doing it with 1-1 lately.ruthlessimon wrote: ↑Sun Nov 17, 2019 9:57 pmDon't have a go at me!! Tom & peter started it!!!!!!
In 3yrs I have never seen Tom do anything different to 1-0 or 2-0![]()
![]()
Tbf it's nice seeing james lead, cos he has been brave
I aint touching 1-1 with a barge pole atm!!
- ruthlessimon
- Posts: 2146
- Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2016 3:54 pm
The White's can't be separated!
Great mid table battle
Great mid table battle

- ShaunWhite
- Posts: 10438
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 3:42 am
- ruthlessimon
- Posts: 2146
- Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2016 3:54 pm
No surprise to see Peter rising up the table.... thank god he missed a week
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- ShaunWhite
- Posts: 10438
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 3:42 am
ruthlessimon wrote: ↑Sat Nov 23, 2019 5:07 pmThe White's can't be separated!
Great mid table battle![]()

I think I may have to turn to backing the safer scores, I was 20 points away from making it to the top 15 and now I'm 40 - luck reversion may be kicking in.ShaunWhite wrote: ↑Sat Nov 23, 2019 5:18 pmIf you keep scoring 5's you'll have to stop sending remindersWhen you need points fair play goes out of the window.
- ruthlessimon
- Posts: 2146
- Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2016 3:54 pm
Even though I don't fully trust my formulas
Given the current stats - "I think" the 'ultimate table' (after a million years etc) would look something like this (although I'm not sure).
But given what Peter's like, I'm not surprised it comes out like this
(but then that said, he's never won it yet
)


Given the current stats - "I think" the 'ultimate table' (after a million years etc) would look something like this (although I'm not sure).
But given what Peter's like, I'm not surprised it comes out like this
(but then that said, he's never won it yet

You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
I'm suprised to not see Dallas in that table, I'm sure him and Peter aren't a million miles away in their predictions each week.ruthlessimon wrote: ↑Sat Nov 23, 2019 7:55 pmEven though I don't fully trust my formulas![]()
![]()
Given the current stats - "I think" the 'ultimate table' (after a million years etc) would look something like this (although I'm not sure).
But given what Peter's like, I'm not surprised it comes out like this
(but then that said, he's never won it yet)
- ruthlessimon
- Posts: 2146
- Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2016 3:54 pm
I only did the current top 15.
Adding him in, he's above Peter (54:10 is an insane ratio).
The problem is, missed rounds is a variable I haven't accounted for (I can't be arsed to look

That "ultimate table" assumes everyone has scores in every week. but if someone misses a week, that's not the same as them getting all the results wrong.
So don't let it spook you - cos I don't think Peter's gonna catch ya
- ruthlessimon
- Posts: 2146
- Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2016 3:54 pm
Also I'm not sure ratios are the right way to look at it, because any leader (i.e. lots of scores) is gonna be placed lowruthlessimon wrote: ↑Sat Nov 23, 2019 8:19 pmSo don't let it spook you - cos I don't think Peter's gonna catch ya
Tbh I think it needs to be taken with a big pinch of salt!!!!!
-maybe it's be better to save the complicated ratio stuff; & just got for: (No. of scores + No. of results)/Rounds played
We do tend to leap from each other throughout the season having alternative good and bad months - but we are the only two now to have finished in the top 5 in both the previous seasons.jamesg46 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 23, 2019 8:05 pmI'm suprised to not see Dallas in that table, I'm sure him and Peter aren't a million miles away in their predictions each week.ruthlessimon wrote: ↑Sat Nov 23, 2019 7:55 pmEven though I don't fully trust my formulas![]()
![]()
Given the current stats - "I think" the 'ultimate table' (after a million years etc) would look something like this (although I'm not sure).
But given what Peter's like, I'm not surprised it comes out like this
(but then that said, he's never won it yet)
But it's looking very unlikely for me I'll be there this year after that missed round