bookies are usually very afraid of martingale
This system makes more sense to me than making combined coupons.
changing algorithm matches between 3 and 4.5 percentageagog wrote: ↑Mon Sep 27, 2021 12:28 pmI am interested as to your initial stake size and the size of your bank....
If every bet you place is at Evens and you only wish to make a £2 profit once one bet wins, then your 10th bet in a losing sequence would be £1024 (I might be out with that calculation but you get the idea). Anyone who thinks a sequence of 10 losing even-money bets doesn't occur is sorely mistaken.
You would therefore need a comparatively massive bank just for a £2 per sequence profit and there's no guarantee you can get your bets on when the stakes are increased dramatically.
Do not proceed with this venture. Even if you make a small profit, it would only be through sheer luck.
Many thanks for pointing out that I don't know the 'simple things' that others do on this forum. I was actually trying to help with a simple example of how a martingale, in its most basic form, is non-viable.kahin wrote: ↑Mon Sep 27, 2021 12:44 pmchanging algorithm matches between 3 and 4.5 percentageagog wrote: ↑Mon Sep 27, 2021 12:28 pmI am interested as to your initial stake size and the size of your bank....
If every bet you place is at Evens and you only wish to make a £2 profit once one bet wins, then your 10th bet in a losing sequence would be £1024 (I might be out with that calculation but you get the idea). Anyone who thinks a sequence of 10 losing even-money bets doesn't occur is sorely mistaken.
You would therefore need a comparatively massive bank just for a £2 per sequence profit and there's no guarantee you can get your bets on when the stakes are increased dramatically.
Do not proceed with this venture. Even if you make a small profit, it would only be through sheer luck.
profit rate between 100% and 140%
not 1.90 or 2 odds like classic roulette
There will be 2 odds and you will win the starting amount
they already know these simple things on this forum
I'm just talking about the forum's effective connection with bettingagog wrote: ↑Mon Sep 27, 2021 12:51 pmMany thanks for pointing out that I don't know the 'simple things' that others do on this forum. I was actually trying to help with a simple example of how a martingale, in its most basic form, is non-viable.kahin wrote: ↑Mon Sep 27, 2021 12:44 pmchanging algorithm matches between 3 and 4.5 percentageagog wrote: ↑Mon Sep 27, 2021 12:28 pmI am interested as to your initial stake size and the size of your bank....
If every bet you place is at Evens and you only wish to make a £2 profit once one bet wins, then your 10th bet in a losing sequence would be £1024 (I might be out with that calculation but you get the idea). Anyone who thinks a sequence of 10 losing even-money bets doesn't occur is sorely mistaken.
You would therefore need a comparatively massive bank just for a £2 per sequence profit and there's no guarantee you can get your bets on when the stakes are increased dramatically.
Do not proceed with this venture. Even if you make a small profit, it would only be through sheer luck.
profit rate between 100% and 140%
not 1.90 or 2 odds like classic roulette
There will be 2 odds and you will win the starting amount
they already know these simple things on this forum
Apologies - I now realise you are beyond help.....
My aim is to make profit constantly.