Find the Gap Guardian Automation Bot for Greyhounds
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2017 8:04 pm
Hi,
Does anyone have a version or the rule set/conditions they could screen shot so I could add this to Betdaq?
Any help appreciated
Thanks
Does anyone have a version or the rule set/conditions they could screen shot so I could add this to Betdaq?
Any help appreciated
Thanks
I have just started with automation so you may want to wait for one the "professionals" to answer.
However, from the description, it suggests that the rule will no longer be triggered as soon as your back bet on that selection has been matched (or partially matched), i.e. it should prevent more than one back bet being placed on the selection.
- ShaunWhite
- Posts: 9731
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 3:42 am
Almost... Partially matched trades are considered to be unmatched.phrenetic wrote: ↑Thu Jan 04, 2018 9:24 pmI have just started with automation so you may want to wait for one the "professionals" to answer.
However, from the description, it suggests that the rule will no longer be triggered as soon as your back bet on that selection has been matched (or partially matched), i.e. it should prevent more than one back bet being placed on the selection.
Thanks.ShaunWhite wrote: ↑Fri Jan 05, 2018 12:20 amAlmost... Partially matched trades are considered to be unmatched.
In the Find The Gap file, the rule is actually "Back bets matched = £0" so it appears to be looking at the amount matched on the bet rather than whether a bet is "matched" or not. In this case, does a partially matched bet meet the condition?
Gonzothegreat wrote: ↑Tue Sep 05, 2017 8:39 pmHere's my bot (based on Dallas one from this thread), it does what the above says.rainbow219 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 05, 2017 5:44 pmDallas wrote: ↑Tue Sep 05, 2017 3:40 pmYou can build/modify it anyway you want so yes you could green up and stop the rule if a loss value is reached and/or have the green up trigger if a bet is still unmatched after X seconds so the bot continues but just doesn't have a unmatched bet sitting pointlessly if the odds are clearly moving away
Can anyone advise me of how to set up this rule please?
red at 25p and green at 10p.
Feel free to let me know what sort of improvements you can add, I'd love to make this bot green up to a pound a race.
At the moment it's kind of 40/60 success rate I would say, I do not know why yet.
40/60 is not too bad for a start. You shared this some time ago. How did it go in the end?
Gary - i have a very crude and basic way to determine how someone may be doing with a strategy that they'd mentioned previously (with no updates thereafter). I simply click on their profile and see when they last were active on the forum. Acts as a fairly dumb litmus test, but I'm sure it's validGaryCook wrote: ↑Thu Jun 28, 2018 7:12 amGonzothegreat wrote: ↑Tue Sep 05, 2017 8:39 pmHere's my bot (based on Dallas one from this thread), it does what the above says.
red at 25p and green at 10p.
Feel free to let me know what sort of improvements you can add, I'd love to make this bot green up to a pound a race.
At the moment it's kind of 40/60 success rate I would say, I do not know why yet.
40/60 is not too bad for a start. You shared this some time ago. How did it go in the end?
[/quote]
Gary - i have a very crude and basic way to determine how someone may be doing with a strategy that they'd mentioned previously (with no updates thereafter). I simply click on their profile and see when they last were active on the forum. Acts as a fairly dumb litmus test, but I'm sure it's valid
[/quote]
LOL - They must've cracked it and are now too busy sipping cocktails on their yatchs in the sun to bother tuning in to the plebs anymore.
Gary - i have a very crude and basic way to determine how someone may be doing with a strategy that they'd mentioned previously (with no updates thereafter). I simply click on their profile and see when they last were active on the forum. Acts as a fairly dumb litmus test, but I'm sure it's valid
[/quote]
LOL - They must've cracked it and are now too busy sipping cocktails on their yatchs in the sun to bother tuning in to the plebs anymore.
Made me laugh and I think the same thing but that was a losing bot anyway. I was just wondering if had tried anything else with it and if it's something I have not seen.jimibt wrote: ↑Thu Jun 28, 2018 9:37 amGary - i have a very crude and basic way to determine how someone may be doing with a strategy that they'd mentioned previously (with no updates thereafter). I simply click on their profile and see when they last were active on the forum. Acts as a fairly dumb litmus test, but I'm sure it's validGaryCook wrote: ↑Thu Jun 28, 2018 7:12 amGonzothegreat wrote: ↑Tue Sep 05, 2017 8:39 pm
Here's my bot (based on Dallas one from this thread), it does what the above says.
red at 25p and green at 10p.
Feel free to let me know what sort of improvements you can add, I'd love to make this bot green up to a pound a race.
At the moment it's kind of 40/60 success rate I would say, I do not know why yet.
40/60 is not too bad for a start. You shared this some time ago. How did it go in the end?
I will keep coming back personally even if I never crack it. The whole thing is interesting but challenging. Although people spend several years studying these days just to earn a modest wage so its worth the time in money too just on the off chance I manage to crack it. I have been close a few times already.
Do you mean specific amount matched at a certain price
Or the amount matched on a selection/market
There is a 'Volume condition' you can add to this file to specify the amount required
https://www.betangel.com/user-guide/vol ... 3D&mw=MzIw#